Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay do we have any info that what will tier 1A look like? I still dont have a idea about how they differentiate r>f requirements for each tier.They are yet to finish, Ultima is still taking his time to recover and soon continue
Yeah, R>F can be a basis of getting it. You don’t really need to transcends infinite countable dimensions anymore. Say “more real than real” within enough context can give you R>F.Okay do we have any info that what will tier 1A look like? I still dont have an idea about how they differentiate r>f requirements for each tier.
Not really, it still requires much context behind it. Like the Dreaming in DC is described as more real than real and holds stories of all dreamer across Creation and is above the material plane. The vantage point from it would give it R>F as such someone like Dream would be 1-A.So it means shittons of character will be ugraded to 1A? Oh god wiki is turning to CSAP
Wait 1A DC wil return? YikesNot really, it still requires much context behind it. Like the Dreaming in DC is described as more real than real and holds stories of all dreamer across Creation and is above the material plane. The vantage point from it would give it R>F as such someone like Dream would be 1-A.
God from Matteis Cosmology will be 0. DC would most likely return back to its original tiers.Wait 1A DC wil return? Yikes
That's a surefire thing?God from Matteis Cosmology will be 0. DC would most likely return back to its original tiers.
DC mostly relies on R>F trancendence so pretty much possibleThat's a surefire thing?
I asked him and he did confrim it since that depiction of God perfectly fits his description of 0. An attribute-less Brahman.That's a surefire thing?
Wild. The Spectre tier 0 smurf?I asked him and he did confrim it since that depiction of God perfectly fits his description of 0. An attribute-less Brahman.
There can only be one tier 0 characters per verse after the revisions. There will be no smurfs for tier 0.Wild. The Spectre tier 0 smurf?
Kinda pointless to scale everyone to 0 since everyone would be 0 by logic and only one 0 per verse.Wild. The Spectre tier 0 smurf?
There can. If it's meant by a lower tier guy with tier 0 hax.There will be no smurfs for tier 0.
There can be multiple High 1-A but only one High 1-A+ and 0.Can there be multiple Hight 1-A+? Or can anyone link me to tldr version on what disqulified someone from H1A+
SCP will suffer because of thisBirden fazla Yüksek 1-A olabilir ancak yalnızca bir Yüksek 1-A+ ve 0 olabilir.
That’s the point.SCP will suffer because of this
After reading revision again I've realised that CSAP was always right about saying dimensional tiering is useless. But still I have sense that someone will come up and eventually refute this thing...That’s the point.
No, it is not. That's unfounded.After reading revision again I've realised that CSAP was always right about saying dimensional tiering is useless. But still I have sense that someone will come up and eventually refute this thing...
What is unfounded exactly?No, it is not. That's unfounded.
Your claim.What is unfounded exactly?
Let's be honest, CSAP is practically guys copying our entire tiering system then bragging about not updating it from 2018.After reading revision again I've realised that CSAP was always right about saying dimensional tiering is useless. But still I have sense that someone will come up and eventually refute this thing...
Wait this wiki once used that goofy tiering system?Let's be honest, CSAP is practically guys copying our entire tiering system then bragging about not updating it from 2018.
I hope I'm wrong, I hope this revision will be beneficial for us. I mean majority of powerscaling community doesnt take VSBW serious anymore. And it makes me question existence of this wiki at this point.Your claim.
Sadly.Wait this wiki once used that goofy tiering system?
I'm...suprised.
Honestly in my case the opposite. I can't take csap seriously when I go to see profiles and there is a profile of a character in 2-C and then another profile of the same character in 1-S. I know that subjectivity plays a role, but the people who make the profiles do not respect or understand the system they use. That's why I prefer vsbw, it's more organized and we can debate based on official profiles even though the profiles don't satisfy everyone. I mean there are many characters that I would like to have much higher tiers, but crying because they don't let you wank your favorite character at tier 0 (which is the reason why i think everyone hates vsbw) seems ridiculous to me .I hope I'm wrong, I hope this revision will be beneficial for us. I mean majority of powerscaling community doesnt take VSBW serious anymore. And it makes me question existence of this wiki at this point.
Well I dont take them seriously too but this new tiering isnt something I can agree easily. Now we will see many irrevelant characters getting upgraded 1A. I mean we want to be strict system right?Honestly in my case the opposite. I can't take csap seriously when I go to see profiles and there is a profile of a character in 2-C and then another profile of the same character in 1-S. I know that subjectivity plays a role, but the people who make the profiles do not respect or understand the system they use. That's why I prefer vsbw, it's more organized and we can debate based on official profiles even though the profiles don't satisfy everyone. I mean there are many characters that I would like to have much higher tiers, but crying because they don't let you wank your favorite character at tier 0 (which is the reason why i think everyone hates vsbw) seems ridiculous to me .
Do you even understand what you're saying at all? Do you really understand how harder the new requirements are?Well I dont take them seriously too but this new tiering isnt something I can agree easily. Now we will see many irrevelant characters getting upgraded 1A. I mean we want to be strict system right?
.......they changed the requirements, most outer characters are getting downgraded, and only some of the characters that use r>f or qualitative superiority is getting upgraded.Well I dont take them seriously too but this new tiering isnt something I can agree easily. Now we will see many irrevelant characters getting upgraded 1A. I mean we want to be strict system right?
You do understand that it is the point of the Wiki itself, right? I myself am a part of their Discord server, and if you were to try to wank some characters there to 1-S, they ain't gonna accept anything. After all, it's all fun and games until you descend into such madness more and moreHonestly in my case the opposite. I can't take csap seriously when I go to see profiles and there is a profile of a character in 2-C and then another profile of the same character in 1-S
Well r>f trancendense is easier than describing some alephs and hierarchy shenanigans. But if wiki makes r>f transcende harder then why not ? I just want people stop abusing wiki for their satisfaction.Do you even understand what you're saying at all? Do you really understand how harder the new requirements are?
One does not become 1A , one is born 1A then huh?I think you are forgetting the part in which a character cannot climb to a higher reality (r>f) by their own means, since in that case it will be considered an anti-feat and will fail in the attempt. Like arale or bugs bunny for example.
I must agree here. You can't convince me R>F is harder to explain than alephs and all this stuff, especially after I learned like 4 ways of reaching from aleph-1 to aleph-2, and each of them getting more interesting than the otherWell r>f trancendense is easier than describing some alephs and hierarchy shenanigans
Exactly. I spend damn 6 months to understand what is cardinal number.I must agree here. You can't convince me R>F is harder to explain than alephs and all this stuff, especially after I learned like 4 ways of reaching from aleph-1 to aleph-2, and each of them getting more interesting than the other