- 1,614
- 728
I agreeabove goku
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agreeabove goku
Don't give liliminal any idea bruhabove goku
It doesn't correlate to 1-A either, proof of that is in the assumption that you don't need explicit infinite-dimensional (or higher-dimensional) statements in order to have things that reach the tier. I can understand not wanting to take the position of assuming something is literally omnipotent if it's coming from an otherwise unimpressive verse but the logic isn't all that different. In either instance, you'd be arguing that you first need to prove the existence of something that is inherently lesser than it in order to assume that it is as it's described.There's also the hurdle of accepting that the scope of cosmology doesn't actually correlate to Tier 0 anymore.
Don't give liliminal any idea bruh
Now he's not going to keep quiet about Goku
I agree
yeah. it's a pretty small list though.By chance, does anyone here have a list of possible candidates for 1-A or H-1A?
For JTTW, are you sure Dharmakaya should count as 0? As for Lovecraft, I think Az and Yog should just be High 1-A+ with the Supreme Archetype specifically left unknown. I mean I think we have to favor Yog in a specific context but it doesn't seem to be universally agreed within different interpretations.No I was actually bedridden for a while. Shit was terrible.
I'm back from the sickness dimension, though, so, I guess the fun resumes now.
Sankara's Supreme Brahman is impersonal, Nirguna (without Gunas or attributes), Nirakara (formless), Nirvisesha (without special characteristics), immutable, eternal and Akarta (non-agent). It is above all needs and desires. It is always the Witnessing Subject. It can never become an object as It is beyond the reach of the senses. Brahman is non-dual, one without a second. It has no other beside It. It is destitute of difference, either external or internal. Brahman cannot be described, because description implies distinction. Brahman cannot be distinguished from any other than It. In Brahman, there is not the distinction of substance and attribute. Sat-Chit-Ananda constitute the very essence or Svarupa of Brahman, and not just Its attributes.
The Nirguna Brahman of Sankara is impersonal. It becomes a personal God or Saguna Brahman only through Its association with Maya.
Quite sure.For JJTW, Are you sure Dharmakaya should count as 0?
I still do think Yog is legitimately 0, but over the course of the past 3 weeks I've become more indifferent to that. I'm willing to defend it but I can take it or leave it, at the end of the day.As for Lovecraft, I think Az and Yog should just be High 1-A+ with the Supreme Archetype specifically left unknown. I mean I think we have to favor Yog in a specific context but it doesn't seem to be universally agreed within different interpretations.
Honestly, I support you're take on that. I’d agree it's 0.Quite sure.
I don't think Yog is completely separable from the verse especially not with all the confusion as to who the ultimate pinnacle of the verse is. I think being the “Supreme Archetype” is just too ambiguous to be taken seriously and who rules the Ultimate Void seems like a better title.I still do think Yog is legitimately 0, but over the course of the past 3 weeks I've become more indifferent to that. I'm willing to defend it but I can take it or leave it, at the end of the day.
Yeah, I always believed in that notion. Though context and references are always a good thing to have.If you are conceptually transcendent of space-time down to its foundation, and all context supports that, I don't really think there is interpretation to be had. You just objectively wouldn't be bound in space whatsoever. There is no need to even mention specific orders of dimensionality. They wouldn't apply. This happens across all levels of realness relative to the lower-layer as well. The qualities of lower-worlds simply aren't applicable whatsoever to higher-worlds with higher-qualities.
Glad you're well now Ultima. Welcome back to powerscaling hfil.Quite sure.
I still do think Yog is legitimately 0, but over the course of the past 3 weeks I've become more indifferent to that. I'm willing to defend it but I can take it or leave it, at the end of the day.
I would say High 1-A seems more plausible.Would JTTW Buddha classify as 1-A?
Tier 0 isn't any form of "transcending all qualities", it's being a monad.A set of all possible character strings is a set of all qualities. That's how I see it.
Tier 0 is being a "monad" via transcending all qualities and distinctions, Agnaa. That's like the most basic principle of the tier.Tier 0 isn't any form of "transcending all qualities", it's being a monad.
Really, the true form's description sounds more like Ultima's proposed bottom of the tiering system. Making that tier 0 just because it can take on a High 1-A+ form would be quite ludicrous, imo.
It absolutely doesn't qualify. It involves changeTier 0 is being a "monad" via transcending all qualities and distinctions, Agnaa. That's like the most basic principle of the tier.
Encompassing all possible character strings across an unlimited amount of worlds and reality layers would be High 1-A+ based on Ultima's tiering system. It'd encompass all qualities, embodying a set of them. Pretty sure he even verbatim states SRE's shell is a good example.
The True Form is the propagating force behind the shell. It is true nonexistence, because it lacks even the set of all qualities and transcends it. Just another way of being a monad.
It's not an immutable monad with oneness with everything. It's nothingness whose husk is all character strings. It's changeable.Right now, I am thinking about becoming even less existent. Strictly speaking, I am already not here. The proof of the existence of the mechanical void has already been demonstrated. What is not here is the empty husk ("抜殻") of my self. But if I should disappear even further, so that even this form no longer exists, then I will really not be here. I will not exist in any form.
In my honest opinion, Ein Sof can’t be 0 for pretty obvious reasons.Will God (Unsong) stay 0?
The difference between this being the bottom of the tiering system or the top is that this degree of nonexistence is seemingly obtained by effectively transcending the High 1-A+ set of all qualities, rather than just being separate from it all.It's not an immutable monad with oneness with everything. It's nothingness whose husk is all character strings. It's changeable.
It feels like you're not really grappling with what I'm saying; there's no response there to "Being this nonexistent is what Ultima put at the bottom of the tiering system". You're just saying over and over again "This is just another way of being a monad".
I never once disagreed with it being High 1-A+, no need to rant about that aspect.
As long as it’s the source for everything including all High 1-A+ sets as well as detach from the entire hierarchy then it can be 0. Though absolute nothingness must be its nature itself and not some sort of quality as right now 0 is argued to be attribute-less though arguments are being made that it’s not a possible thing.The difference between this being the bottom of the tiering system or the top is that this degree of nonexistence is seemingly obtained by effectively transcending the High 1-A+ set of all qualities, rather than just being separate from it all.
I do not think there is any actual causality happening here, either. The narrative of SRE is always just its Shell, which does not correlate to its true state. It can't ever actually refer to its true form due to its inherent nature as some true nonexistence.
Ultima and I talked about it; probably not. There's a bunch of stuff indicating that R>F differences (or even God himself) are below/comparable to mathematics. Plus, the Atzmus is established as being a separate thing superior to God, but isn't itself described in monad terms. But he wants to reread everything to be sure.Will God (Unsong) stay 0?
Hell, from what I'm reading on the page, it's not even established as transcending those writings. Just being separate and nonexistent.The difference between this being the bottom of the tiering system or the top is that this degree of nonexistence is seemingly obtained by effectively transcending the High 1-A+ set of all qualities, rather than just being separate from it all.
That's going against the text itself, which describes transitions from one state to another. Point to something in the text establishing what you're saying.I do not think there is any actual causality happening here, either. The narrative of SRE is always just its Shell, which does not correlate to its true state. It can't ever actually refer to its true form due to its inherent nature as some true nonexistence.
Kinda weird if Amaranth would be 0, if it can be obtain unless it’s established that those who ascend to it were always part of its oneness.So the only tier 0 characters that will stay as the same tier are The Amaranth, The Clear Light and IMTIM. Characters that will become tier 0 (that i know of) are Dharmakaya, God (Divine Comedy) and probably Marvel God and DC God.
Okay do we have any info that what will tier 1A look like? I still dont have a idea about how they differentiate r>f requirements for each tier.They are yet to finish, Ultima is still taking his time to recover and soon continue
Yeah, R>F can be a basis of getting it. You don’t really need to transcends infinite countable dimensions anymore. Say “more real than real” within enough context can give you R>F.Okay do we have any info that what will tier 1A look like? I still dont have an idea about how they differentiate r>f requirements for each tier.
Not really, it still requires much context behind it. Like the Dreaming in DC is described as more real than real and holds stories of all dreamer across Creation and is above the material plane. The vantage point from it would give it R>F as such someone like Dream would be 1-A.So it means shittons of character will be ugraded to 1A? Oh god wiki is turning to CSAP
Wait 1A DC wil return? YikesNot really, it still requires much context behind it. Like the Dreaming in DC is described as more real than real and holds stories of all dreamer across Creation and is above the material plane. The vantage point from it would give it R>F as such someone like Dream would be 1-A.