- 1,898
- 989
We made it to page 100, woot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Depends on what "possible world" means in that case, since there's multiple types of possibility, of course. If you think metaphysical possibility is a thing, for instance, then "All metaphysically possible worlds" wouldn't include all the tiers, since that type of possibility doesn't concern itself only with whether a contradiction exists at all, but also with the actual nature of the world beyond that. So I imagine it'd go up to Low 1-A at most, as a default.I have a genuine question. How do we assume that possibilities like 'Every possible world' (like from Leibniz's possible worlds) includes any possible level of High 1-A possibilities within it as High 1-A+ implicates ?
I assumed it was just because the existence of 'any possible level of High 1-A' doesn't really contain a true contradiction , so it would be included, but I'm not 100% certain of that. Especially when it seems pretty NLF to assume that 'possible worlds' incorporate every level of High 1-A just automatically.
What of impossible worlds?Depends on what "possible world" means in that case, since there's multiple types of possibility, of course. If you think metaphysical possibility is a thing, for instance, then "All metaphysically possible worlds" wouldn't include all the tiers, since that type of possibility doesn't concern itself only with whether a contradiction exists at all, but also with the actual nature of the world beyond that. So I imagine it'd go up to Low 1-A at most, as a default.
If it's literally just "Literally any logically valid contingent state-of-affairs corresponds to a different reality," though, then, yeah, there's no reason that'd not include all the tiers in the system before 0. It's not really NLF if you explain it right (Which I imagine most verses don't, though). Just a mention of "possible worlds" obviously wouldn't suffice, either way.
Basically, what OC writers do most of the timesMe: entering a competition that consists of saying random words
my rival: Yes, and our current system essentially encourages a form of Suggs-style social Darwinian divisive psychopathically power-mad frantic competition to constantly gain greater levels of comparative supremacy in order to grind everyone else under a single bootheel, rather than encouraging a perspective of true oneness (and therefore equality) for everyone at the end, so I technically find what we are currently doing highly immoral as well.
me: I give up
Why do you read this slop.
the yap in question
Why do you [REDACTED]Why do you read this slop.
LMFAOScratch that, it will be very funny to see TikTok kids use monad without knowing what it is to wank their favorite characters.
Irrelevant layers into monadhood.
boundlessly irrelevant layers into high extraboundlessversal+The day people started using the word "Irrelevant" in place of a number is the day powerscaling stopped being fun.
I’ve seen a guy unironically(I think) argue goku is realBro, I heard people scaling a character to layers above fiction. I'm not kidding.
I saw guys like that too. Goku hasn't beaten me up so it's safe to say he doesn't exist.I’ve seen a guy unironically(I think) argue goku is real
I'm looking forward to Self-Reference Engine no longer being the strongest character on the site. It's pretty lame.
That kinda just doesn't work cause unless you are referring to the cardinality of the empty set (which is zero and thereby two of those get thrown out the window instantly), functions (unless specified to work with sets, and given you are using the basic operators there, don't and can't be) just don't work.@Ultima_Reality What's x/empty set, x^empty set, and log(empty set)x?
yesSo set theory is has gone that far from their throne?
The whole point of the set of all sets is that technically it is the biggest number.
Are we trying to trade math the bedrock for every other part of the tiering system for philosophy at the very end?
Journey to the west. Characters were they reach "absolute omnipotence"The problem is that I believe Chinese verses disqualify themselves by making all their levels of existence accessible via some amount of hierarchical ascendance.
Like, the "Dao," as a lone concept, most likely qualifies for Tier 0 in the same way I think the Monad, Form of Good, Brahman, Supreme Ultimate Reality, and etc... would also be Tier 0.
But Xianxia often has characters become one with the Dao, or even "transcend" the Dao, which disqualifies it.
Below Goku's finger.what do we do for characters that are unbound by any hierarchy whatsoever, all-encompassing, cannot be reduced or fractured, formless in nature and beyond human comprehension, preceding and exceeding all dualities and polarities, all of them equal in power being absolute in the most literal sense, as there is nothing to limit, restrict, restrain, confine, disturb or condition them, are subject to no other power, for there is no other power, and all stem from the unique primordial sea of conceptual essence, the origin of all things
but this kinda doesnt qualify for tier 0 due to a few things