• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Just going by what's presented, I'm finding myself agreeing with the OP. Unless there's very specific scans of this solar system being more durable than a greater space-time continuum somehow, it seems pretty damning.
Did you read my comment? Even cardinal world planet is so durable that Milim who is top 5 in the verse can’t destroy it let alone the solar system.
 
Someone who sees the thread and knows nothing about Tensura now thinks Velgrynd can't even be 4-B, lol.
I didn't even claim any specific tier for them. I don't know where this 'they should only scale to 4-B' argument comes from. All I was saying is that not all worlds in Tensura have the same size, so it shouldn't automatically scale to Low 1-C.

I was using Solar System-level DC as an argument for range purposes. I already said AP and DC can vary, and true Dragons can scale above 4-B.
So just wait my explaination.
Sure👍
This characters did not suddenly upgrade from 5-B to Low 1-C. There was a process to this, and this thread ignores this entire process.
You should have created the scaling chain thread before upgrading all the characters to Low 1-C. So, you shouldn't blame others. I mean addressing this small/weak world's arguments altogether.
 
Did you read my comment? Even cardinal world planet is so durable that Milim who is top 5 in the verse can’t destroy it let alone the solar system.
Top 5 in the verse means nothing. Where would Milim DC or AP scales so we can scale Planets durability to it. Otherwise what you claiming wouldn't mean nothing at all.
 
Completely ignoring the calls of spite, I feel like there's something missing to this revision. Probably since it's a Japanese verse and each like can be translated like 4 different ways, so this doesn't click as right to me. I'd like to see the other translations of the passages in the OP.
 
Completely ignoring the calls of spite, I feel like there's something missing to this revision. Probably since it's a Japanese verse and each like can be translated like 4 different ways, so this doesn't click as right to me. I'd like to see the other translations of the passages in the OP.
Which scans are you referring to?
 
Some Otherworlds are so small that a fully unleashed True Dragon can erase them from existence. This suggests that certain Otherworlds are smaller than a Solar System in size. If they were larger, the world could potentially contain the destruction without being completely erased.

Official translation thread also stated these are weak fragile small worlds.

This leads to the conclusion that while some worlds are larger than a main universe, others are smaller than a solar system. Thus, the size of Otherworlds varies, ranging from solar system level to low-complex multiverse level (the currently accepted rating for the main universe). Otherworlds contained within some alternate dimensions should also fall within the same range. Simply containing solar system-sized Otherworlds does not make these dimensions universal in range or low-complex multiverse level either.
I'm not even going to bother answering much here. Just that, this argument makes me laugh so much. The thing with the solar system is that the Cardinal World is very resistant, the only world capable of sheltering the True Dragons and the primordial Demons. Well each world is at least a universe, so the argument with the solar system shit is so invalid. The thing with weak worlds is that, they don't have magicules, like Rimuru's previous universe, which was precisely called weak world.

The thing about destroying a weak world instantly is not about range, but about resistance. The author capped the speed of the verse at SoL so instantly destroying a minimum Solar System sized structure would require MFTL+ speed, which already invalidates your logic. Furthermore, the Cardinal World has been said to be a strong world and the reason why it is the strongest world is known, showing once again that it is not about range but resistance. A normal universe will just succumb to the power of a True Dragon's aura, simple as that.
Additionally, there was a statement about the strength of dimensional walls varying from dimension to dimension, which outright suggests that not all dimensions would be on the same level as Hypertimelines (low complex multiverse-level) durability.
Of course, this means absolutely nothing. Every world has a "resistance" as I said, and the same thing translates here. The fact is that not all Hypertimelines are equal. Some are above the Baseline. So in short this does not justify in any way why they would not be Hypertimelines.

Just going by what's presented, I'm finding myself agreeing with the OP. Unless there's very specific scans of this solar system being more durable than a greater space-time continuum somehow, it seems pretty damning.
 
Cardinal universe doesn't scale to Low 1-C nor True Dragons has the range to destroy it. Also you still not proved how much of an difference between power of this planet and Solar system would differ from Normal Solar system and planet. So what you are saying isn't helping here with anything.
Cardinal world is low 1C. Literally the most durable thing that exists in verse. Even people who have/can destroy dimensions can’t destroy cardinal world. (Destroying the planet is DC not AP)
I already explained it in the OP.

No one scales to it. So far Rimuru only time travelled through it. Nothing else.
You simply didn’t read the cosmology page.
I'm talking about True Dragons not milim.
Milim having less DC and better AP than True Dragons isn't proving anything here
Destroying the planet is yet again DC. And Milim has better both.
AP & DC are different things.
You don’t seem to know the difference
So where do you scale this supposed planet's durability? I don't really care if it's stronger than normal planets. You should provide an alternative way to scale this planet's durability if you're going to say it's on different leven than planets.
Low 1-C dura due to the fact that even people who can destroy low 1C objects can’t destroy it. Nor can they damage it much.
Either way, Cardinal World is not what was accepted as Low 1-C, so True Dragons wouldn't be scaling to Hypertimelines.
cardinal world scales above. And the world as a whole is already accepted as low 1-C. So since I already have shown that it is about durability and not range all your arguments fall flat.
 
Even if there is evidence that the planets and stars of the Cardinal World are as durable or even more durable than a space-time continuum, wouldn't we still need evidence that they are as durable or even more durable than the hypertimeline? Or that destroying a space-time continuum would also destroy the hypertimeline together? As far as I remember, the upgrade states that even with the space-time continuum of the universe being destroyed, the hypertimeline remained existing and unchanged, so "destroying a space-time continuum" should not be the same as "destroying a space-time continuum + a hypertimeline", and concrete evidence would be needed for such a thing.
A world. Includes the hypertimeline. A dimension holds worlds. A dimension has been destroyed. That means that the hypertimelines (the worlds inside the dimension . Are destroyed) yet that person who destroyed the dimension CANNOT destroy even a planet in cardinal world. That automatically makes the planet scale above even dimensions in terms of durability let alone a single world.
 
Last edited:
If you have a genuine counterargument other than asking Elde to your already addressed questions literally in his OP, you can talk as much as you can, but so far, you have not done this. The point here was that you were not being respectful toward him, quit your accusatory tone and deliberate ignorance. Your friend (i guess) Phantom Guy has already told you guys to stop responding, but I guess you don't listen to him either.

Anyways, adding to Elde's point, true dragons can destroy small dimensions, or characters can even have enough energy to destroy planets in Cardinal World. But these feats have zero implication that they can destroy a hypertimeline. Yeah Cardinal World is durable but not everything inside itself is at the level of a Hypertimeline

What next? Average unique skill user is Low 1-C too because they can destroy buildings of Cardinal World?
Everyone in cardinal world is already low 1-C via magic. And I mean everyone. Everything you have said I have already debunked
 
I didn't even claim any specific tier for them. I don't know where this 'they should only scale to 4-B' argument comes from. All I was saying is that not all worlds in Tensura have the same size, so it shouldn't automatically scale to Low 1-C.
All worlds have a hypertimeline. It is literally what a world is.
I was using Solar System-level DC as an argument for range purposes. I already said AP and DC can vary, and true Dragons can scale above 4-B.
Using solar system as an argument for range simply doesn’t work cause it isn’t based on range in the first place. It is based entirely on durability. You ignored everything I listed in my argument. And have yet to prove even a single one of your arguments. Small world translation was already explained that it translates better to weak world. So idk why you keep insisting on changing the translation to fit your argument
Sure👍

You should have created the scaling chain thread before upgrading all the characters to Low 1-C. So, you shouldn't blame others. I mean addressing this small/weak world's arguments altogether.
 
I'm surprised by this, honestly... besides the Cardinal World having Veldanava's blessing/power, there are also relics that must be destroyed to do anything, I even remember that the world regenerates, if someone can help me with that scan I would appreciate it. It's not plot armor like other verses that the world is not destroyed by the beings that live there, but the World is set up that way, Veldanava did this.



 
A world. Includes the hypertimeline. A dimension holds worlds. A dimension has been destroyed. That means that the hypertimelines (the worlds inside the dimension . Are destroyed) yet that person who destroyed the dimension CANNOT destroy even a planet in cardinal world. That automatically makes the planet scale above even dimensions in terms of durability let alone a single world.
I don't know if destroying the dimensions that contain the worlds is enough to say that the hypertimeline is being destroyed too, since the cosmology page says that the hypertimeline exists in the void, even after the destruction of the space-time continuum.
 
Last edited:
@PHANtomFELdway I'll wait for Code to reply. It's hard to understand what you are saying.
I'll address your points later. I understand what you are saying but I have some other work to do.
I'm surprised by this, honestly... besides the Cardinal World having Veldanava's blessing/power, there are also relics that must be destroyed to do anything, I even remember that the world regenerates, if someone can help me with that scan I would appreciate it. It's not plot armor like other verses that the world is not destroyed by the beings that live there, but the World is set up that way, Veldanava did this.



Thanks for the scan I will look at them later 🙏
 
Hypertimelines are not spatial dimensions, they do not contain things.
And the page on the back treats the dimensions as containers of worlds, not that they are the hypertimeline itself.
Worlds are the hypertimelines. A dimension is the container of those hypertimelines. Yet the dimension itself is destroyed. Which obviously includes the stuff inside it
 
Worlds are the hypertimelines. A dimension is the container of those hypertimelines. Yet the dimension itself is destroyed. Which obviously includes the stuff inside it
No, the universes are not hypertimelines, this goes against what was proposed in the upgrade and what is written on the cosmology page.
When the space-time continuum ceased to exist, only the hypertimeline remained, this is what it says, if the hypertimeline and the world (space-time continuum) were the same thing, then neither should exist anymore.

I don't know if "destroying the dimensions also destroys the hypertimeline" can be considered a fact or not, but destroying the world (space-time continuum) does not mean that the hypertimeline was destroyed, at least that is what is shown on the cosmology page, since the hypertimeline exists even after the World (space-time continuum) no longer exists.
 
Last edited:
3 month rule doesn't apply here. My thread has nothing to do with the upgrade thread. This is related to scaling chain (where it was not addressed the points in my OP). Stop commenting if you don't know what you are talking about.
Your argument does not have so much relevance if you know it in one or another assumption, besides that there is something illogical, for example, as the dimensions that Zalario destroyed, according to you, are the size of the solar system, if what Velgrynd finds difficult to destroy, with his STRENGTH, is a solar system of the Cardinal world, your argument does not make so much sense if you analyze it well.
Appeal to ignorance.
I already posted the scans in the OP.
The scans you posted do not mention what I asked for, besides, there are not even any of the ones I asked for, that's why I did it, isn't it?
Even if there is evidence that the planets and stars of the Cardinal World are as durable or even more durable than a space-time continuum, wouldn't we still need evidence that they are as durable or even more durable than the hypertimeline? Or that destroying a space-time continuum would also destroy the hypertimeline together? As far as I remember, the upgrade states that even with the space-time continuum of the universe being destroyed, the hypertimeline remained existing and unchanged, so "destroying a space-time continuum" should not be the same as "destroying a space-time continuum + a hypertimeline", and concrete evidence would be needed for such a thing.
If you are going to use this argument, you will have to wait the three months, since for that, you need the same points that were debunked, besides, that it was scaled to Low 1-C per world, due has a temporal Hyperline, that you would understand, if you realize that Vega, owns the world map, which there is one, for each world in Tensura, which reside in alternate dimensions.
 
If you have a genuine counterargument other than asking Elde to your already addressed questions literally in his OP, you can talk as much as you can, but so far, you have not done this. The point here was that you were not being respectful toward him, quit your accusatory tone and deliberate ignorance. Your friend (i guess) Phantom Guy has already told you guys to stop responding, but I guess you don't listen to him either.
I only mentioned that, because that kind of scanning does not exist, unless I invented it.
Anyways, adding to Elde's point, true dragons can destroy small dimensions, or characters can even have enough energy to destroy planets in Cardinal World. But these feats have zero implication that they can destroy a hypertimeline. Yeah Cardinal World is durable but not everything inside itself is at the level of a Hypertimeline
The Cardinal world is the strongest world because it is protected by the power of Veldanava, and Veldanava created the verse, so it makes sense.
What next? Average unique skill user is Low 1-C too because they can destroy buildings of Cardinal World?
You think it's a universe like ours? You don't even know what you're writing, please, I thought anyone who has touched the verse would know how to tell the difference.
 
Worlds are the hypertimelines. A dimension is the container of those hypertimelines. Yet the dimension itself is destroyed. Which obviously includes the stuff inside it
Nah bro, i feel like i need to question this because bro claimed that world contain hypertimeline, yet in OP Elde specifically listed scans claimed that there are small, fragile worlds which < universe, that mean your claim is contradicted by scans themselves, unless of course you have proofs that hypertimeline is even smaller than smallest worlds, that could change thing
 
Last edited:
Comments that only explain a certain point don't mean much. We really need a blog for this, but I don't have time to do that right now.

So for now I'll just explain the logic of scaling.


Current Cosmology

Cardinal World

An hypertimeline [Low 1-C], contains the Cardinal World's Universe and an infinite number of alternate timelines [2-A] of the Universe and the insignificant 5D structure between timelines.

It is essentially the Low 1-C construct that Ivaraj, the World Destroying Dragon, failed to destroy, which continued to exist even after the Cardinal World's Universe was destroyed by Feldway.

Cardinal World's Universe
It is the main universe that was destroyed by Feldway through an unknown ways.

Cardinal Universe's Main Planet
The planet that contain the power of Veldanava (Creater of Countless Worlds), who cannot be destroyed even by Milim, probably the most powerful person after Feldway.

Note: Even a Tower with Veldanava's relic can block the attack of Michael, one of the strongest characters in the series.

Dimensions
They are containers [with own timeline] that can even contain Dimensional Worlds [Low 1-C] such as Cardinal Worlds.

These Dimensional Worlds both contain Parallel Universes (like Cardinal World's Universe timelines, remember that essentially the MWI applies to every plane of existence) like the one Velgrynd travels through and are home to Galactic civilizations.

Isolated Dimensions
They are essentially isolated states of the dimensions that contain the worlds. They can contain a simple dungeon to a sky full of stars.

The Ramiris Labyrinth consists of isolated dimensions, and these dimensions and other Dimensional Worlds are separated by space-time.


Scaling

Now let's evaluate the feats of the characters.

Carrera's Abyss Annihilation statements:
A black hole capable of destroying a planet, and Kondou predicts this magic could destroy the dimension Velgrynd created, but since the properties of the dimension Velgrynd created are unknown, we do not assume that this feat is Low 1-C.

Note: Here, the term "planet" is like a planet used when giving an example, does not refer to the Cardinal Universe's planet.

Velgrynd's feat in destroying 50 floors with one strike (also Veldora's 2-3 floors feat) the of the Ramiris Labyrinth:

Apart from the fact that each floor in the Ramiris Labyrinth is an isolated dimension, they have their own timelines and can even contain the starry sky, we don't know much about the structure of the floors, so we do not assume this feats as Low 1-C.

Zalario's destroyed dimensions feat:
Dimensions destroyed by Zalario; includes Worlds that appear to have the same cosmological structure as the Cardinal World, with parallel universes and galactic civilizations, so we consider this feat a Low 1-C.

"True Dragon's can blows up the weak/small worlds" statement:
Here again, the Worlds mentioned are Low 1-C structures where MWI is valid during travel to the past in alternate dimensions.

As far as I remember, the expression weak rather than small was used here, but even if the kanji really meant that these Worlds were small, it could not be said that the World in question was the size of a planet or solar system based on this word alone.

WoG Support:
――ヴェルグリンドには空間移動能力があります。並列空間にも移動できますが、その力で他の世界に影響を与えたりすることはあるんですか?

伏瀬厳密に言えばあります。でも一応制御はしてるので、影響を出さないようにしていると思います。それこそヴェルザードだったら、そんなの気にしないでしょうね。相手の世界が壊れようが関係なしと思う可能性が高い。このふたりの間には、気配りができる人とできない人の明確な違いがありますね。
Fuse confirms that Velgrynd's power can affect parallel spaces (which seem to be parallel universes in this context) and even other Worlds, and states that she can destroy them, but does not allow to do so.

――リムルを中心に描かれている物語だからこそ、激しい戦いがあっても温かく見えるけど、その外側の世界は厳しいという温度差。改めて、「転スラ」はリムルの物語なんだな、と思います。

伏瀬そうですね。ギィなんかはひとりで世界を滅ぼせるけど、しないんですよ。なぜなら、それに意味がないから。意味がないことをするキャラがあまり出てこないのが「転スラ」だと思っています。
In the same interview, Fuse stated that Guy Crimson could destroy the World by single.

Note: Fuse is referring to the Cardinal World here, but later wrote a story where even Satanael Milim couldn't destroy the Cardinal Planet, and even Feldway could only destroy the Cardinal Universe, and even Ivaraj, the Dragon who destroys worlds, couldn't destroy the Cardinal World. So this can only be used as a supporting.



Additionally, Velgrynd can easily destroy a starry sky with a single hit, while a solar system level attack is nothing to her.

In conclusion, I disagree.
 
Last edited:
Nah bro, i feel like i need to question this because bro claimed that world contain hypertimeline, yet in OP Elde specifically listed scans claimed that there are small, fragile worlds which < universe, that mean your claim is contradicted by scans themselves, unless of course you have proofs that hypertimeline is even smaller than world, that could change thing
I'm not even going to bother answering much here. Just that, this argument makes me laugh so much. The thing with the solar system is that the Cardinal World is very resistant, the only world capable of sheltering the True Dragons and the primordial Demons. Well each world is at least a universe, so the argument with the solar system shit is so invalid. The thing with weak worlds is that, they don't have magicules, like Rimuru's previous universe, which was precisely called weak world.

The thing about destroying a weak world instantly is not about range, but about resistance. The author capped the speed of the verse at SoL so instantly destroying a minimum Solar System sized structure would require MFTL+ speed, which already invalidates your logic. Furthermore, the Cardinal World has been said to be a strong world and the reason why it is the strongest world is known, showing once again that it is not about range but resistance. A normal universe will just succumb to the power of a True Dragon's aura, simple as that.

Of course, this means absolutely nothing. Every world has a "resistance" as I said, and the same thing translates here. The fact is that not all Hypertimelines are equal. Some are above the Baseline. So in short this does not justify in any way why they would not be Hypertimelines.
Worlds are universes at a minimum, and they are weak worlds, not small worlds. Like wtf is this scan of the OP? It seems to me to be a shitty translation (the qualityof the translationis self-explanatory). It was translated as weak, but there is an attempt to force the small just to be able to use this other dodgy scan.
 
Last edited:
Comments that only explain a certain point don't mean much. We really need a blog for this, but I don't have time to do that right now.

So for now I'll just explain the logic of scaling.


Current Cosmology

Cardinal World

An hypertimeline [Low 1-C], contains the Cardinal World's Universe and an infinite number of alternate timelines [2-A] of the Universe and the insignificant 5D structure between timelines.

It is essentially the Low 1-C construct that Ivaraj, the World Destroying Dragon, failed to destroy, which continued to exist even after the Cardinal World's Universe was destroyed by Feldway.

Cardinal World's Universe
It is the main universe that was destroyed by Feldway through an unknown ways.

Cardinal Universe's Main Planet
The planet that contain the power of Veldanava (Creater of Countless Worlds), who cannot be destroyed even by Milim, probably the most powerful person after Feldway.

Note: Even a Tower with Veldanava's relic can block the attack of Michael, one of the strongest characters in the series.

Dimensions
They are containers [with own timeline] that can even contain Dimensional Worlds [Low 1-C] such as Cardinal Worlds.

These Dimensional Worlds both contain Parallel Universes (like Cardinal World's Universe timelines, remember that essentially the MWI applies to every plane of existence) like the one Velgrynd travels through and are home to Galactic civilizations.

Isolated Dimensions
They are essentially isolated states of the dimensions that contain the worlds. They can contain a simple dungeon to a sky full of stars.

The Ramiris Labyrinth consists of isolated dimensions, and these dimensions and other Dimensional Worlds are separated by space-time.


Scaling

Now let's evaluate the feats of the characters.

Carrera's Abyss Annihilation statements:
A black hole capable of destroying a planet, and Kondou predicts this magic could destroy the dimension Velgrynd created, but since the properties of the dimension Velgrynd created are unknown, we do not assume that this feat is Low 1-C.

Note: Here, the term "planet" is like a planet used when giving an example, does not refer to the Cardinal Universe's planet.

Velgrynd's feat in destroying 50 floors with one strike (also Veldora's 2-3 floors feat) the of the Ramiris Labyrinth:

Apart from the fact that each floor in the Ramiris Labyrinth is an isolated dimension, they have their own timelines and can even contain the starry sky, we don't know much about the structure of the floors, so we do not assume this feats as Low 1-C.

Zalario's destroyed dimensions feat:
Dimensions destroyed by Zalario; includes Worlds that appear to have the same cosmological structure as the Cardinal World, with parallel universes and galactic civilizations, so we consider this feat a Low 1-C.

"True Dragon's can blows up the weak/small worlds" statement:
Here again, the Worlds mentioned are Low 1-C structures where MWI is valid during travel to the past in alternate dimensions.

As far as I remember, the expression weak rather than small was used here, but even if the kanji really meant that these Worlds were small, it could not be said that the World in question was the size of a planet or solar system based on this word alone.

WoG Support:

Fuse confirms that Velgrynd's power can affect parallel spaces (which seem to be parallel universes in this context) and even other Worlds, and states that she can destroy them, but does not allow to do so.


In the same interview, Fuse stated that Guy Crimson could destroy the World by single.

Note: Fuse is referring to the Cardinal World here, but later wrote a story where even Satanael Milim couldn't destroy the Cardinal Planet, and even Feldway could only destroy the Cardinal Universe, and even Ivaraj, the Dragon who destroys worlds, couldn't destroy the Cardinal World. So this can only be used as a supporting.



Additionally, Velgrynd can easily destroy a starry sky with a single hit, while a solar system level attack is nothing to her.

In conclusion, I disagree.
According to the translators' thread, they were not parallel worlds/universes, they were parallel dimensions. I sent it to be translated months ago.

 
I do not agree with the premise that there are universes the size of a solar system. In the scan that mentions the destructive power of the four characters, it is also stated a paragraph earlier that it was the greatest destructive power since the creation of the universe. Additionally, there is the fact that Rimuru, in a parallel story (How to Spend Certain Vacations), mentioned the exploration of outer space, not to mention the statements in the later volumes about the destruction of the universe.

Now, considering that the Cardinal World has the relics of God, regenerates, and is a semi-spiritual world (as far as I recall, there are only three types of worlds: physical worlds without magic, semi-spiritual worlds, and spiritual worlds), taking into account several characters' declarations about destroying the stars in the Cardinal World—made by characters who are not among the strongest in the verse—and the feats performed always referencing the stars in the Cardinal World, an attack at the solar system level is the strongest attack carried out in the strongest world known. Obviously, it would surpass Velgrynd's attack, which was executed in a weaker or smaller world, as the OP states.

However, considering how the story treats the Cardinal World compared to other worlds, it is not an exaggeration to say it is more resilient than a weaker world that can be destroyed by a True Dragon. If there were a more direct comparison about the size of a world to say it is the size of a solar system, I would agree with the OP. But all I see in the OP is a comparison of destructive power in a strong world versus a weak world. The only 'world' (though it is not actually a world) that can be said to be smaller than a solar system is the Stellar Palace, which is no more than a few kilometers in diameter and was Veldanava's birthplace before creating the worlds.
 
Nah bro, i feel like i need to question this because bro claimed that world contain hypertimeline, yet in OP Elde specifically listed scans claimed that there are small, fragile worlds which < universe, that mean your claim is contradicted by scans themselves, unless of course you have proofs that hypertimeline is even smaller than smallest worlds, that could change thing
In fact, I translated that, and it says: "Some worlds were small enough that a True Dragon fully unleashed could wipe them out of existence;" Not mentioned as “weak."

Inconclusive you can translate it yourself.
 
Last edited:
Worlds are universes at a minimum, and they are weak worlds, not small worlds. Like wtf is this scan of the OP? It seems to me to be a shitty translation (the qualityof the translationis self-explanatory). It was translated as weak, but there is an attempt to force the small just to be able to use this other dodgy scan.
I mean, it is official translation, from what OP show

Beside from the translator replies, he also mean that small world is or could be another meaning, not just weak because if it isn't he will simply say no, not yes. Anyway from the way translator on our site translated, and the official translation, it seem the official one using both meanings, i don't think it is not legitimate
In fact, I translated that, and it says: "Some worlds were small enough that a True Dragon fully unleashed could wipe them out of existence;" and it says: "Some worlds were small enough that a True Dragon
True Dragon fully unleashed could wipe them out of existence;" nowhere in the sentence does it mention "weak."

Inconclusive you can translate it yourself.
Huh?, isn't it still pose the problem, as you translated it to small world? It still mean that not all worlds are the same in size and it mean supporting the arguments from the OP that scale all and every world to Low 1-C is wrong?
 
I mean, it is official translation, from what OP show
I don't see where he said that though.
Beside from the translator replies, he also mean that small world is or could be another meaning, not just weak because if it isn't he will simply say no, not yes. Anyway from the way translator on our site translated, and the official translation, it seem the official one using both meanings, i don't think it is not legitimate
Yeah sure but I don't think here we will just say "it also means this so we debunk".
Huh?, isn't it still pose the problem, as you translated it to small world? It still mean that not all worlds are the same in size and it mean supporting the arguments from the OP that scale all and every world to Low 1-C is wrong?
It's a matter of durability, with the Cardinal world being more durable than all others, being the only world that can house and contain the destruction of the True Dragons and those comparable to them. This doesn't show that some aren't Low 1-C, but that some are above the Baseline.
 
I mean, it is official translation, from what OP show

Beside from the translator replies, he also mean that small world is or could be another meaning, not just weak because if it isn't he will simply say no, not yes. Anyway from the way translator on our site translated, and the official translation, it seem the official one using both meanings, i don't think it is not legitimate

Huh?, isn't it still pose the problem, as you translated it to small world? It still mean that not all worlds are the same in size and it mean supporting the arguments from the OP that scale all and every world to Low 1-C is wrong?
It says that there are small worlds, not that they are all like that, nor are they mentioned as "weak", another thing to take into account is that OTL English, and some parts of Spanish, are not well translated.
The other thing is that these worlds are not universes, just in case you didn't know.

And if you mention those small worlds so much, why don't you mention the bigger ones? And why do you try to favor an opinion that has already been explained and addressed?
 
Back
Top