- 9,553
- 10,927
How does this debunk my point?Eh, the directors literally dies at the ends of the comics, and didn't give much of a shit after scout half hour monologue
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How does this debunk my point?Eh, the directors literally dies at the ends of the comics, and didn't give much of a shit after scout half hour monologue
Engineer is canonically a BLU engineer mainly, so is Medic.No? The blue mercs in meet the team are constantly proved as far weaker versions than the red versions. Cmon spy literally soloed the entire blue team
The problem is that meet the videos are weird, there are a mercs for every single team. In the medic video there is literally houndreds of fodders soldiersEngineer is canonically a BLU engineer mainly, so is Medic.
I wasn't talking about the meet the videos mate. I was talking about the MVM stuff.The problem is that meet the videos are weird, there are a mercs for every single team. In the medic video there is literally houndreds of fodders soldiers
I mean yeah that how it works, that is literally scalingI wasn't talking about the meet the videos mate. I was talking about the MVM stuff.
Oh yeah the director who could barelly record any shit before he was killed, and he was bored to death by merc toomfolery. Also don't you think that it would be kinda impossible to do any of that shit with bare bones edition?Literally all the "Meet the Merc" videos are directed in a way to hype up the individual merc; of course each trailer is individually going to portray each merc being met as someone who's far above the rest because it's their video intended to be all about them. It isn't about RED Vs BLU nor are any of those videos reliable for upscaling.
And yet Scout is scaled directly to Heavy in LS, which means they're literally scaling to someone who hard overpowers them in LS.I mean yeah that how it works, that is literally scaling
Heavy>>>>Soldier (The 2nd strongest merc)>>>Scout (potrayed as one of the weakest mercs physically)
What are you even trying to say here? It's incoherentOh yeah the director who could barelly record any shit before he was killed, and he was bored to death by merc toomfolery. Also don't you think that it would be kinda impossible to do any of that shit with bare bones edition?
Yeah that doesn't maky any senseAnd yet Scout is scaled directly to Heavy in LS, which means they're literally scaling to someone who hard overpowers them in LS.
Director isn't very reliable. Also we have gone trough this argument once, and is basically the same argumentsWhat are you even trying to say here? It's incoherent
Imma respond later, TF2 discusions steals a little piece of my soulPlease prove how is the Director not reliable, you've been repeating the same point and still haven't proven it.
Was inverse square law used? Comparing the cross sectional area of the sentry and train respectively?There's also this accepted calc from March for a Sentry being able to barely survive a train crashing into them while wrangled, resulting in a 0.007 Ton Feat. Don't think it's been discussed before, probably scales to Soldier's rockets and Demoman's Grenades. Wonder if it'll be useful in this discussion.
I don't think that applies for KEWas inverse square law used? Comparing the cross sectional area of the sentry and train respectively?
That's not the relevant part, it applies to attacks with large initial area of effect striking smaller targets. That Sentry is significantly smaller than the train and thus only took a portion of the train's impact.I don't think that applies for KE
....What?That's not the relevant part, it applies to attacks with large initial area of effect striking smaller targets. That Sentry is significantly smaller than the train and thus only took a portion of the train's impact.
That is not how it works tho.... The sentry is only a few times smaller than the train in surface area atleast, or even less considering the wrangler gives the sentry a bigger hitboxeA flyswatter with 1000 J of Kinetic energy, and in insect that's 1000x smaller in terms of cross sectional area taking a hit from that same flyswatter has only taken 1 J and thus it's only a 10-C durability feat despite taking a hit from a 9-C attack.
What? you know that i am refering that the sentry SHIELD, counts as the sentry, if you hit the shield you hit the sentry. As far as i renemberHitboxes are still game mechanics and not equal to the actual cross sectional area of the physical object. Also, I literally looked at the video in which it happens; the sentry is definitely a lot smaller than the train that hit it. Remember, you got to take height and width into account when using cross sectional area. It's like at least 4x taller and about twice as wide, meaning the sentry would scale from 1/8th the impact at best.
Guess i'll make another post...Don't know if i'll make more posts here, probably not if it ends shortly
Has this ever been used in KE Calcs or been consistently used? The Calc was accepted perfectly fine without the ISL and the Common Feats has KE Calcs that use some different way to get the energy and below that, it directly states that there are instances where Characters can scale to the full KE of an object (one of which being a train, which I think is sorta recent?)Was inverse square law used? Comparing the cross sectional area of the sentry and train respectively?
There's was ongoing debate lolWas this never applied...?
Eh, I don't really care that much, I know I have enough support to apply shit, I'm just lazy/want to let the bullshit finish lolI mean, unless they come back I think theres enough staff input to just apply this, maybe get DDM back in he re to confirm
This thread is downgrading them to low-end 9-APeople are trying to upgrade TF2 to....idk 8-C? (There are some ******* 6-C calc but those are mega wank)