- 61,177
- 14,747
- Thread starter
- #361
My calc was backed by multiple calc members and Medeus agreed with it soSir Ovens said:I had your clac doctored by DMUA and he said to just use the full extent of the explosion. Bambu agreed with this notion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My calc was backed by multiple calc members and Medeus agreed with it soSir Ovens said:I had your clac doctored by DMUA and he said to just use the full extent of the explosion. Bambu agreed with this notion.
You can shoot a normal human with a pistol multiple times without them dying but that doesnt make every human in existence 9-BThe Smashor said:@DDM
"Oh man, the characters can't possible scale to things that they can take multiple hits from and would eventually die from"
That's what you sound like.
That's not helping SmashorThe Smashor said:@DDM
"Oh man, the characters can't possible scale to things that they can take multiple hits from and would eventually die from"
That's what you sound like.
Correct, said 'most of the blast' was calced at 9-BSir Ovens said:We would still give them the tier for at least tanking most of the blast.
It's just common sense; characters scale to each other if they moderately damage each other for sure. If character A ragdolls Character B, and Character B can either not do anything about it or can only slihgly harm them via stuff like poking them in the eye (As in not real damage and more so just a nerve wreck) then Character A scales above B, but B doesn't scale from A. If character A gets vaporized / obliterated easily by B, then Character A shouldn't scale from B but B's attack scales above A's durability.
Pls I just want this thread to be overJackythejack said:Can we just agree on possibly 9-A and link Dargoo's calc for it or smth
Dargoo's calc was reclaced to 9-B soJackythejack said:Can we just agree on possibly 9-A and link Dargoo's calc for it or smth
Dargoo's calc was reclaced to 9-B soJackythejack said:Can we just agree on possibly 9-A and link Dargoo's calc for it or smth
9-B, possibly 9-A.WeeklyBattles said:Dargoo's calc was reclaced to 9-B soJackythejack said:Can we just agree on possibly 9-A and link Dargoo's calc for it or smth
This is awful logic, you can die to many things that don't vaporize you, do you not grasp that for them to be vaporized by said weapon it needs to be much higher than their durability?The Smashor said:@DDM
"Oh man, the characters can't possible scale to things that they can take multiple hits from and would eventually die from"
That's what you sound like.
The fact that the 9-B+ feat was a Scout who was already gravely injured? That's pretty obvious in the cinematicWeeklyBattles said:What is supporting 9-A? 9-B feats nearly kill them