• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Suggestions for improvements (New forum)

While it's not a bad layout arrangement in theory, in practical terms we'd be talking about updating nearly 30,000 profiles - some of which have multiple keys - and for many of those profiles there's going to be a ton of Unknown values as most editors aren't going to be familiar with a ton of characters from that list in order to detirmine what belongs in each of those new speed entries.
 
Damage3245 said:
While it's not a bad layout arrangement in theory, in practical terms we'd be talking about updating nearly 30,000 profiles - some of which have multiple keys - and for many of those profiles there's going to be a ton of Unknown values as most editors aren't going to be familiar with a ton of characters from that list in order to detirmine what belongs in each of those new speed entries.
Click to expand...
CreatorJoe said:
Maybe we should separate the different kinds of speed such as attack, reaction, and travel speed on character pages like this:

Attack Speed:

Reacton Speed:

Travel Speed:
Click to expand...
Well actually, this wouldn't be for every profile in the wiki. Just for the ones who have different speeds for their reaction, travel, and attack speed.
 
That's a large part of them, and we would still have to check through around 28,000 pages in order to find them, for very limited cosmetic gains. As such, this is not a realistic suggestion to apply.
 
Ogbunabali said:
The proposal looks good to me.

I think for the priority it should be 3 tiers instead

3 - Calc, or straightforward ability additions, adding scans, etc

2 - Bigger additions like new tiers, or some verse wide changes, etc

1 - Controversial additions like tier 1, Conceptual Manipulation, etc
Click to expand...
Antvasima said:
Couldn't we include straightforward tier changes from accepted calculations in AKM's suggestion for type 4 instead? Still, I suppose that type 2 and 3 are similar. What do you think @AKM sama ?
Click to expand...
Ogbunabali said:
The tiers are going to be vague regardless, and mainly reliant on the short description provided in any case, so I think less is more in this case.
Click to expand...
AKM sama said:
I'd also include controversial revisions involving controversial verses/characters here. Something like revising Goku or any controversial character from HST should fall under this if the revision is controversial. It's really hard to define what is "controversial" though since it is based on context.
Click to expand...
Antvasima said:
Okay, so are you otherwise fine with Ogbunabali's suggested structure?
Click to expand...
@AKM sama

We need your help in order to be able to proceed here. Afterwards I can modify the earlier draft that I posted.
 
3 - Calc, or straightforward ability additions, adding scans, etc

2 - Bigger additions like new tiers, or some verse wide changes, etc

1 - Controversial additions like tier 1, Conceptual Manipulation, or significant revisions for controversial characters/verses, etc

Just use this.
 
Here is a modified draft for the first post of our new wiki management thread:

"This thread can be used to link to discussions in the content revision forum regarding changes to verses or profiles, so that they may be seen and evaluated by staff members without the need of contacting them individually. In the event that posting the revision here fails to obtain enough attention, users can politely ask a few staff member who are listed in the related verse page or the knowledgeable members list to give it a look via their message walls.

Members can link to the revision here, but discussions regarding said revisions must be made in the respective thread to prevent derailments.

The comments should contain all of this information in them:

Priority: On a scale from 1 to 3, with lower numbers being more important.
  • 3 - Revisions based on accepted calculations, or straightforward ability additions, where everything is blatant and sourced.
  • 2 - More significant changes involving new tiers, a significant part of a verse, and similar.
  • 1 - Controversial additions, such for tier 1 and/or 0, complicated powers such as conceptual manipulation, or significant revisions for controversial characters/verses, et cetera.
Verse: To specify the verse the revision is aimed for.

Description: A small summary of what the revision will modify.

Note: Any further information that might help getting the attention of staff members or other users.

Remember that a revision must contain all of the necessary information regarding the topic that it tackles, with links and evidence to support the upgrade, downgrade or modifications in general. Don’t link in this page revisions that are incomplete or that are lacking to prevent too many spam messages.

IMPORTANT NOTES:

This thread is supposed to give users one more way to get attention from both other users and staff members, but since there are many daily revisions the request should contain as many details as possible to attract more interest and to give everyone more relevant information.

Here are some important rules that should be noticed:
  • Users can post each revision once and can bump it after 30 days from the first post, but the latter should only be done if a thread has a low participation.
  • Only a single revision for each verse can be posted here per week, after which a new revision about the same verse can be posted again.
  • Each user can post only one revision per week.
All of the rules above are made to prevent too much spam in the thread, so follow them as much as possible.

If a revision has been accepted or rejected, the member who posted a request for it should edit their comment to add a “Closed” on top of it, so that the staff can know which revisions that still need to be evaluated."
 
Last edited:
We want to avoid too much spam. It is best if our members mainly post requests for the most important/crucial revisions.

Anyway, is it fine if I create the new wiki management thread now, and then link to it in our wiki navigation bar?

Also, what title should we give the thread?
 
You can create it now.

"CRT Promotion Thread" or something like that? I am not sure.
 
Maybe "Content revision promotions thread" or "Content revision thread promotions", or somesuch? Writing the word "thread" twice in a single phrase seems verbally inappropriate in any case.

Also, can somebody instruct me regarding the proper grammar for each phrase? I have ongoing problems with intuitively grasping where to use or not use multiple cases of plural in combination when using the English language.
 
Using "thread" twice is technically correct, just not pleasant.

"Content Revision Promotion Thread"
Should work. Nouns used as adjectives should never be plural. That would be like calling a "Hotdog Stand" a "Hotdogs Stand".

In this case, "Content Revision" and "Promotion" are adjectival nouns which describe the noun "Thread", and so are not plural.
 
Thank you for the explanation. I will try to remember it. So "Content Revision Promotion Thread" it is then. Should I create the new thread the next time I visit this one?
 
Thank you. I will create the new thread then.
 
I have done so:

vsbattles.com

Content Revision Promotion Thread

This thread can be used to link to discussions in the content revision forum regarding changes to verses or profiles, so that they may be seen and evaluated by staff members without the need of contacting them individually. In the event that posting the revision here fails to obtain enough...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
 
I also added a link to the new wiki management thread to our wiki navigation bar.
 
Could a proyect be done at some point to add categories for verses depending in terms of appropiatedness rating? For example, a category for verses with content appropiate for minors, a category for verses with content only suitable for adults, etc.

We could also add a template so younger viewers of pages may avoid verses or content that are too inappropiate for them.
 
That is likely a good idea, but not one that we can prioritise right now. We have some other ongoing and upcoming important wiki revisions.

Please keep it in mind for the future though.

"All-ages suitable verses" and "Adults only suitable verses" perhaps?
 
I will note down the suggestion in my community to-do-list.
 
Dice system integration. So we can play DND 5e, 3.5e, Mage, Exalted 2e/3e, and many other games including custom games. I saw it on RPNation.

This is so people aren't bothered by 2,000 character limit on discord and also you can fancy up your content much more than on Discord like this.
 
So you want to get some kind of role-playing thread forum then? That seems to distract too much time from our main focus here, even though it might be fun for our members. My apologies.
 
Well, I am not certain. Maybe other staff members here may think otherwise.
 
Damage3245 said:
We're not expecting professional standards of posting here, but this kind of response is really unnecessary.
Click to expand...
Well, it isn't like he insulted me. He was just disappointed.
 
Antvasima said:
So you want to get some kind of role-playing thread forum then? That seems to distract too much time from our main focus here, even though it might be fun for our members. My apologies.
Click to expand...
Antvasima said:
Well, I am not certain. Maybe other staff members here may think otherwise.
Click to expand...
What do other staff members here think about this?
 
Well, just adding a new sub-forum for RPG threads would be fairly easy at least, but I don't know about customisation.

Also, there is a big risk that our members would post story content that would violate Fandom's terms of use.
 
Antvasima said:
Well, just adding a new sub-forum for RPG threads would be fairly easy at least, but I don't know about customisation.

Also, there is a big risk that our members would post story content that would violate Fandom's terms of use.
Click to expand...
can you give me a quick summary of fandom's terms of use?

really, having a dice roleplay sub-forum would be no different from our current rp threads- but now they have stats and charts and charts.
 
It sounded to me more like a request of adding features to the forum to enable easier and funnier role playing.

In any case, I've seen threads of that nature in the Fun and Games board for years, so I don't think a whole forum for that would be required.
 
Bobsican said:
It sounded to me more like a request of adding features to the forum to enable easier and funnier role playing.

In any case, I've seen threads of that nature in the Fun and Games board for years, so I don't think a whole forum for that would be required.
Click to expand...
yes you could integrate it into the normal foruma
 
Bobsican said:
It sounded to me more like a request of adding features to the forum to enable easier and funnier role playing.

In any case, I've seen threads of that nature in the Fun and Games board for years, so I don't think a whole forum for that would be required.
Click to expand...
Okay. Thank you for the information.

I am not sure what features that he specifically wants us to apply though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

AKM sama
New Staff Promotions
2
Replies
67
Views
5K
Lloydblitzed
Lloydblitzed
H3110l12345I20
Composite Tree VS Tournament, redo of the dead meme CT!
Replies
14
Views
602
LephyrTheRevanchist
LephyrTheRevanchist
Sans2345
Looking for matches for Jugannave (Tier 9-C)
Replies
1
Views
708
ThePrimalHunter
ThePrimalHunter
Antvasima
  • Locked
  • Sticky
Warning Tracker
Replies
0
Views
4K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Mr. Bambu
Feed Me Your Wretched Anime Suggestions
6 7 8
Replies
284
Views
12K
Armorchompy
Armorchompy
Back
Top