Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Alright. That is fine, no rush. Goodnight.Thank you for helping out. I will have to take a look at this tomorrow though. I have to do my daily wiki edit patrolling and then go to bed.
These are my thoughts as well. Do we need to add an editing rule for this? It should be there already and it should be a common practice.Well, I am not for adding a specific statistics section for it, just that a character's degree of infinity should be mentioned somewhere easily overviewed, either in their own attack potency sections, in footnotes, or in other profile pages that they are scaled from and linked to.
This argument seems entirely pointless to me.Eh. I think it won't really help, and might even lead to arguments over revising the exact level of infinity of a character, with some wanting higher numbers for obvious reasons.
Semantics, maybe, but I'd like to point out that this is not the purpose of CRTs in general, just some.This argument seems entirely pointless to me.
The entire purpose of CRTs in this case is to argue over the exact level of infinity.
This entire forum is about arguing over statistics. Why would we care if people use the CRT section for exactly what it's made for?
Hiding specifics so that people don't know the level of infinity, and therefore won't argue against it seems to go entirely against the goal of indexing characters accurately.
Unreasonable additions will simply be analyzed and rejected.
And I do see where you're coming from. The battleboarding community can be very ravenous.That said, you are right. Our purpose is not to hide statistics. I still believe nailing down such things for your standard user will lead to more harm than good, but aye.
This is a genuine serious problem, yes. The issue is that currently only our bureaucrats can access the page for renaming, merging, or deleting tags in their entireties, in every thread that they are featured, and I am too overworked with other community tasks to handle it on my own, and am also nervous about accidentally permanently messing things up severely (by accidentally clicking the delete button), whereas AKM and DontTalk are helping out as much as they are able here, and Promestein is not very active currently due to being very occupied IRL.Would it be possible to add to the standard duties of moving a page to another name to also do the same to its respective tag on the forum? For quite self-explanatory reasons in relation of finding a thread with the current page name and all.
I think that our character profile pages are already required specify the degree of infinity for them in either the attack potency sections, bottom explanation sections, or linked blogs, but maybe we should add an editing rule for it as well?
I am open for suggestions/draft texts for what the rule should look like.
I do agree there should preferably be an added distinction that 3-dimensional characters who have Infinite on an 11-dimensional scale power aren't to be mixed with characters who are 11-D in general. Same with characters who are 4-D and above but are only finite in scale or even to the point where they aren't even planet level still fighting a 3-D planet level character. And it also adds context to how potent some character's level of spatial intangibility is.
However, I'm unsure about adding a "Dimensionality" stat to every single profile.
Well, I am not for adding a specific statistics section for it, just that a character's degree of infinity should be mentioned somewhere easily overviewed, either in their own attack potency sections, in footnotes, or in other profile pages that they are scaled from and linked to.
It seems like this is a common problem, despite that it is a seemingly self-evident issue, so we likely need an editing rule.
Anyway, we need to write a good rules text for our Editing Rules page as well.Having a rule would at least help to highlight and alleviate the problem, and I think that I mentioned above that we should focus on level of infinity, not dimensionality.
Yeah, but people can comment on blog posts instead of sandboxes. Plus when you’re on mobile, sandboxes show the desktop fandom instead of the mobile fandom for some reason.I think it'd be better in sandboxes, as that way anyone can easily check the source code and edit themselves if required.
Profile page drafts should preferably be written in sandboxes before they are posted, yes.I think it'd be better in sandboxes, as that way anyone can easily check the source code and edit themselves if required.
Agreed. If the pages do not live up to our standards, they will simply get deleted.Ok, I know this is said a lot, even to important projects, but this seems like an ungodly amount of work honestly.
You'd probably need a whole new section of staff dedicated to just doing this as you're literally saying that every single of the dozens/possibly hundreds of profiles made every day needs it's own individual review.
Just don't really think this is something we can realistically do.
Sure. I'll start preparing that now.Okay.
Would you be willing to initiate a thread in our staff forum regarding this topic, based on my responses above, @FinePoint ? I have had a lot to do IRL recently, so I am behind with my wiki and forum workloads.
I made a thread.Thank you for helping out.
That might be fine for minor additions, but in general I believe a CRT should be made.I think that the same rules as usual should apply in that thread. Meaning, that our administrators and thread moderators can officially accept changes to be applied if they explicitly state this in conjunction, but I would appreciate further staff input in this regard.
I do not mind if we place a new brief instruction text in the beginning of our image rendering requests thread, but I am very distracted right now, so I would appreciate if somebody else writes a draft for it.