• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
What is he then, BoS Genos is already High 7-C and G-4 Genos should be closer to Post-Superfight Genos (low 7-B)
G4 Genos only massively upscales from Previous Genos. He doesn't have any showings to put him at High 7-C+ nor is he close enough to upscale to the +.

Tho tbh, I'm not sure why G4 Genos isn't placed as "At least High 7-C"
 
I dunno about that really. But I think MB could get a "possibly far higher" Over that one Saitama statement about Boros almost being a real fight. This is probably the only case where Saitama scaling seem ok, but eh
It's actually much more consistent, because Tatsumaki likely high putted effort into the spaceship. difference between mb boros and tatsumaki destroy part
 
It's still a bit of a reach to say released or MB Boros to be straight up High 6-A or rank him anywhere near that tho.

Tatsumaki showed no signs of actually struggling and was just casually throwing stuff at it. Unlike later on the fight with psykorochi. Her taking very long is likely due to her not putting in that much effort
 
It's still a bit of a reach to say released or MB Boros to be straight up High 6-A or rank him anywhere near that tho.

Tatsumaki showed no signs of actually struggling and was just casually throwing stuff at it. Unlike later on the fight with psykorochi. Her taking very long is likely due to her not putting in that much effort
Of course, she didn't do her best. But it also doesn't make sense that she hit a thousand times weaker. She was annoyed at fight a melzargard for a long time because her s-class was weak.
 
How does the melzalgald fight relate to anything? Plus melzalgald only lasted so long because of his regen
 
How does the melzalgald fight relate to anything? Plus melzalgald only lasted so long because of his regen
that means she didn't like the long time of the battles on the Boros arc. i.e intentionally limiting power and there is no reason to fight for a few minutes
 
Because she finds it to be a nuisance? She was irritated throughout the whole arc.
It's even more nuisance to deliberately limit strength and put effort into it for a several minutes. And she was fighting effectively, looking for a good block to attack. Why would she do something like this if she could destroy a spaceship simply by increasing her power? She said she was going to wipe out the spaceship, so she wasn't looking for an efficient block to play with.
 
Because we know that Tatsumaki tends to not be very serious with something that doesn't pose a threat to her. She definitely wasn't putting her best effort against the ship nor did she visibly struggle. That makes the ship not High 6-A.

And not only that, but the ship in itself never really tanked her attacks and it was clearly damaged. Even the people on board were panicking, which adds why the ship doesn't scale to High 6-A
 
Because we know that Tatsumaki tends to not be very serious with something that doesn't pose a threat to her. She definitely wasn't putting her best effort against the ship nor did she visibly struggle. That makes the ship not High 6-A.

And not only that, but the ship in itself never really tanked her attacks and it was clearly damaged. Even the people on board were panicking, which adds why the ship doesn't scale to High 6-A
Yes she wasn't that serious, but apparently she hated taking the time . she didn't do her best 1/1000.. Even though she was moving effectively?
 
It seems to have damaged the guns. I don't really think either should scale to each other in any capacity.
 
It seems to have damaged the guns. I don't really think either should scale to each other in any capacity.
Please tell me why it shouldn't be scaled. ship was obviously damaged, but the point was didn't have massive damage it with the power she put in. She clearly hated wasting time, so there's no reason for a hundredth of a weak attack.
 
Please tell me why it shouldn't be scaled. ship was obviously damaged, but the point was didn't have massive damage it with the power she put in. She clearly hated wasting time, so there's no reason for a hundredth of a weak attack.
Bit there's no reason for it to scale to her full power tho
 
Also the moon jump, the reason that the ship has 6-A durability in the first place, still caused damage to it. So that’s another point against the ship being High 6-A.
 
Please tell me why it shouldn't be scaled. ship was obviously damaged, but the point was didn't have massive damage it with the power she put in. She clearly hated wasting time, so there's no reason for a hundredth of a weak attack.
There were a few holes, and they seem to have been mostly limited to the guns.

It's also worth noting that even though the ship did survive the moon jump, it made a massive crater on the surface and caused it to slump massively, whereas Tatsumaki's volley didn't do anywhere near that kind of damage.

Why are you assuming she used a hundredth of her full power?
 
Bit there's no reason for it to scale to her full power tho
Personally, in this case, I think it's better to boros have an possibly tier until ag comes out.
Also the moon jump, the reason that the ship has 6-A durability in the first place, still caused damage to it. So that’s another point against the ship being High 6-A.
The moon jump only did very little damage to the ship. It was a vertical attack that was limited to a small range, so it did damage to the power core.
 
There were a few holes, and they seem to have been mostly limited to the guns.

It's also worth noting that even though the ship did survive the moon jump, it made a massive crater on the surface and caused it to slump massively, whereas Tatsumaki's volley didn't do anywhere near that kind of damage.

Why are you assuming she used a hundredth of her full power?
difference between high 6-A and 6-A, isn't it?
 
difference between high 6-A and 6-A, isn't it?
No? Tatsumaki massively scales above around 200 petatons hile the moon impact was only around 800 teratons. That's is more than a 200x difference

Also just a note, the ship survived the moon impact, not the moon jump
 
Except nothing here even justifies a possibly

No? Tatsumaki massively scales above around 200 petatons hile the moon impact was only around 800 teratons

Also just a note, the ship survived the moon impact, not the moon jump
upQPiH9e8jTSeFzWN3nI1613486088.jpg

The moon jump only did very little damage to the ship.
 
@Six_Fold The difference between baseline Continent level and baseline Multi-Continent level is 5.8x. However, Tatsumaki's full power is over 287 times higher than the moon jump.

@Emirp It was greater than Tatsumaki's damages, which is the point. Also, that ship is the size of a large city, so it's absolutely massive, just not comparatively large.

Edit: Never mind. However, it still damaged the gravity core, which hundreds of Tatsumaki's attacks failed to do. We just shouldn't scale them together.
 
The moon jump only did very little damage to the ship. It was a vertical attack that was limited to a small range, so it did damage to the power core.
That doesn’t make a difference, it still got damaged by a 6-A impact. Even numbers wise, the ship being High 6-A doesn’t make sense.

Even if we assumed it was baseline High 6-A, that’s 4.435 petatons, or 4,435 teratons. The impact on the ship was calced at 883.93 teratons. That’s about a 5.02x difference, which is already far too much.

Tatsumaki scales far above 254 petatons/254,000 teratons. That’s about a 287.35x difference. Why in the world would we scale Boros’ ship to her when it was damaged by something about 5x less than baseline High 6-A, let alone 287x less than what you want to scale it to?
 
You accidentally quoted the image twice.

Edit: I accidentally deleted your post as you edited it. Some sort of wiki code thing, sorry.
 
That doesn’t make a difference, it still got damaged by a 6-A impact. Even numbers wise, the ship being High 6-A doesn’t make sense.

Even if we assumed it was baseline High 6-A, that’s 4.435 petatons, or 4,435 teratons. The impact on the ship was calced at 883.93 teratons. That’s about a 5.02x difference, which is already far too much.

Tatsumaki scales far above 254 petatons/254,000 teratons. That’s about a 287.35x difference. Why in the world would we scale Boros’ ship to her when it was damaged by something about 5x less than baseline High 6-A, let alone 287x less than what you want to scale it to?
The author clearly does not think of the calculation of power, and in fact, moon kick is simply 7-A to 6-C if it is calculated. In this case, we ignore the evidence that Boros uses the 7-A feat as a special move, and Shouldn't it be put in tier 6-A?
 
I don't see how it's ambiguous, especially since that jump did more damage to the core than multiple volleys more powerful than the ship's own bullets.
 
I don't see how it's ambiguous, especially since that jump did more damage to the core than multiple volleys more powerful than the ship's own bullets.
I mean, the moon jump actually did damage to the power core, so we can tell how much damage it did.but it's still too vague to determine Boros' tier through destruction range. Because the moon jump showed inconsistency in the destruction range,
 
Yes The same is true in this case.
This is not the same at all. The ship was clearly damaged by the 6-A impact. It’s not ambiguous at all, it was clearly damaged, nor is it inconsistent. Therefore, it cannot be higher than 6-A unless it consistently shows greater than 6-A durability feats, and it has not.
 
Back
Top