• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
OPM Earth is literally just an alternate version of Earth. Hell it might even be our Earth in the future. The intent is obviously for it to have the same size.
Wrong on 2 levels.
  1. If it's an alternate version of Earth, it doesn't need the same size or even atmosphere. The keyword is alternate.
  2. Intent? Is there really any intent there? Does the story need the planet to be the same size for it to continue? The answer is no.
 
Wrong on 2 levels.
  1. If it's an alternate version of Earth, it doesn't need the same size or even atmosphere. The keyword is alternate.
  2. Intent? Is there really any intent there? Does the story need the planet to be the same size for it to continue? The answer is no.
It’s gonna take some pretty decent upstanding evidence to prove the OPM earth is bigger than ours.
 
Of course Saitama will be getting a much higher rating than 5-B, but referring to this, something has always bothered me about the argument: "A 5-C character would be able to destroy the Earth, so this statement doesn't mean he's 5-B." This is practically the same thing as saying that High 7-C character would be able to harm a 7-B character, therefore if the High 7-C character harms the 7-B character, they don't need to scale to 7-B. It doesn't really make sense.

There's no point of arguing semantics, and we should just take the statement for what it is.
 
Of course Saitama will be getting a much higher rating than 5-B, but referring to this, something has always bothered me about the argument: "A 5-C character would be able to destroy the Earth, so this statement doesn't mean he's 5-B." This is practically the same thing as saying that High 7-C character would be able to harm a 7-B character, therefore if the High 7-C character harms the 7-B character, they don't need to scale to 7-B. It doesn't really make sense.

There's no point of arguing semantics, and we should just take the statement for what it is.
iirc. some profiles that i have seen have "destroying the world" as planetary too. if thats the case, then this statement that saitama made should be so as well.
 
Another peak webcomic redraw from smurf dude


c68l5uy3dic91.jpg



9zgl0ozjmdc91.jpg
 
Blast’s statement would make them 5-B regardless, but I take issue with your logic.

Firstly, the Earth isn’t 5-B in terms of durability. That’s the energy required to overpower its GBE (basically mass-scattering it to the point where the debris can’t return). Pulverising the Earth alone is Moon level, and it takes even less power to shatter it.

Secondly, there’s just as many High 6-A characters with statements just like Saitama as 5-B ones.
 
Back
Top