• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
In my opinion, the best looking tiers are:
  • 9-B
  • High 8-C
  • High 7-A
  • High 6-C
  • 5-A
  • 4-B
  • 3-A
  • 2-C
  • High 1-A
The "High" before 6-C ruins it. Just 6-C looks better tbh.

High 8-C is so mid lol. Same with 9-B.

Otherwise decent list.
 
If we're having a tier aesthetics debate... I can't really say much other than that High 7-A is the best.

Sure, 0 and High 1-A is cool and all but there's something about the 7-A combo. Holy number I suppose
High 7-A is indeed one of the greatest tiers. And "Large Mountain level" looks somewhat aesthetic as well.
 
6-C is free-for-all/jack-of-all-trade tiers, there's many of freedom and creativity since it has a lots of match-up potential
High 6-C and High 7-A are way less than 6-C tbh
 
unknown.png
 
If you want I can recalculate using 40km thickness for the CRSC, but the size of the planet would decrease considerably.
 
If you want I can recalculate using 40km thickness for the CRSC, but the size of the planet would decrease considerably.
Dude.

Just assume normal crust size as our Planet and add the water vaping value on top like the current accepted calc does.

That alleviates the pain and we don't have to look for every moment where OPM Earth crust thickness turns from 40 to 260 km every five seconds.
 
Dude.

Just assume normal crust size as our Planet and add the water vaping value on top like the current accepted calc does.

That alleviates the pain and we don't have to look for every moment where OPM Earth crust thickness turns from 40 to 260 km every five seconds.
Wait what? Do you have any other images of the interior of the planet?
 
Dude.

Just assume normal crust size as our Planet and add the water vaping value on top like the current accepted calc does.

That alleviates the pain and we don't have to look for every moment where OPM Earth crust thickness turns from 40 to 260 km every five seconds.
Take a look at mine from Saitama
 
Back
Top