- 313
- 49
Neutral
Neutral
Agree
Agree
Agree
Neutral
Agree
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Some thoughts on the Harry Potter profiles
- Thread starter Dweller_Of_Dreams
- Start date
Jamesthetaker
He/Him- 6,754
- 1,854
Agree. I recall seeing a dozen posts on the internet about the differences between books and movies, which are significant enough to separate them into distinct profiles.
Agree. They can be "High 8-C with magic, Low 7-C with Enviromental Destruction" via the fog creation feat, until better feats come up.
I can agree with this, since nothing implies that Grindelwald is superior to Voldemort; if anything, it's more of the opposite.
Agree. I am not sure how age affects magic, but nothing I know suggests that old Dumbledore is less powerful than his younger self.
Agree. If an eleven-year-old child can achieve 9-B feats, most wizards should be able to scale from them.
I guess the argument makes sense. Like Dumbledore, I don't see why age would have any effect on their magic.
Agree.
Jason_Courne
He/Him- 1,184
- 1,303
Yeah this is obviously something that needed to happen for a while now
Disagree since Credence's feat has the possibility to get higher due to either the screenplay version, or simply a recalc of the feat
Makes sense
Age scaling was always weird so yeah agree with all three
I agree? I'm a bit conflicted since some characters are outrighted to be >>> magic wise
- 202
- 119
Bump
- 202
- 119
Bump
- 202
- 119
- 11,099
- 4,323
Sorry I left this behind for months as I was studying for an important examination, where are we at currently? Calculating the hill bust?
- 150
- 60
- Thread starter
- #249
No problem at all, I hope the examination went well for you! Jason Courne has recalculated Credence destroying the mountainside to around Low 7-C, as far as I understand. I think that's what's currently going on, but I've not been very active myself the last few months.
I guess that defeats my point regarding the downgrade. I'm still a bit iffy about other wizards scaling to Credence, but that probably has more to do with me being mostly a book purist and finding it a little hard to reconcile this level of destructive power with what we see in the books.
- 4,637
- 1,617
at 4:29 mark
I am kinda surprised the calcer in question didn’t bother to check the area that was affected by the spell.
Also not voting as it looks like I need to talk with Rusty about the feat in question
- 555
- 116
Of course, because the power of Credence is uncontrollable and very chaotic, unlike the top of the verse, but this does not mean that he is stronger than them.
- 555
- 116
Why hasn't anyone counted the energy of the Dark Mark's explosion yet?
- 2,584
- 2,234
The 10th doctor’s cloud feat doesn’t have a way to get a scale of size for it
- 202
- 119
Dead
