• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

(SOLVED) When it comes to "Y" character being superior to "X" character, how do we know the former upscales physically?

4,626
2,398
^^^; I need to know this for future profiles. Like we have examples like Caine (The Amazing Digital Circus) and Slenderman from here. But how do we know they upscale physically if some of them directly don't show good physical feats?
 
The "should be" on both profiles justifying the correlation in stats is based on something like context, portrayal, and/or the nature of the writing. I'm not familiar with Slenderman, so I can't dive into the specifics of his ranks, but for Caine, the reason is because he is the god of his digital world in which he created the bodies of characters, and those characters have feats yet the resulting level of power isn't written as out of the ordinary and defying what basic characters in the setting are expected to have. In some settings, due to small differences compared to ones like The Amazing Digital Circus, the scaling is only a likelihood rather than something to be confidently written. I don't think there is a single answer that suits all fictions.
 
The "should be" on both profiles justifying the correlation in stats is based on something like context, portrayal, and/or the nature of the writing. I'm not familiar with Slenderman, so I can't dive into the specifics of his ranks, but for Caine, the reason is because he is the god of his digital world in which he created the bodies of characters, and those characters have feats yet the resulting level of power isn't written as out of the ordinary and defying what basic characters in the setting are expected to have. In some settings, due to small differences compared to ones like The Amazing Digital Circus, the scaling is only a likelihood rather than something to be confidently written. I don't think there is a single answer that suits all fictions.
Slenderman is already ungoshly powerful with his powers and he lets his proxies do the work. The same logic for Caine can be applied to Slenderman.

Thanks for the answer!
 
Back
Top