- 12,447
- 5,641
wank is a lovely word.
anyway...galactus stomps right?
anyway...galactus stomps right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think it has become a no-no word.wank is a lovely word.
anyway...galactus stomps right?
Galactus has kilometers of range so .....wank is a lovely word.
anyway...galactus stomps right?
... Fr? Aight, mb.Just noting w*** isn't a good word. Maybe say overestimation or something.
I remember hearing someone being reprimanded for the word. Not 100% but just to be safe.... Fr? Aight, mb.
In the same thread OP and everyone else agreed it wouldnt affect Sans. So no you are wrongDisagree with Karma killing. As someone who has also played the game, I can say from testing that Karma can't kill you. It can only bring you to 1 HP. If you disagree, I don't know what to say. It's what's shown in-game.
This is an untrue statement. It being listed as Durability negation doesn't inherently it can affect those with uncountably infinite superior durability. It being listed as "limited" durability negation should make that abundantly clear.
The damage decreases as durability increases. That doesn't mean you can arbitrarily place a limit of 1 JUST because that's Frisk's cap in dura in-game. If Frisk was Tier 2 in dura? Sure. But that isn't the case. And the minimum is a fraction of 1 going by the Asriel fight.
If having higher finite durability decreases damage, having durability that's uncountably infinitely above would by default take zero damage. Using the minimum damage against Frisk with max and finite durability isn't a detractor of this. And the CRT that is linked to the limited durability negation makes it seem quite clear imo. They were even suggesting removing it altogether, but I suppose it was settled it could be deemed limited instead.
Yet undertale doesn't do any equivalent of taking 0 damage from massively weaker attacks inverseStats in UT are not linear, and Chara at that point of the game was way stronger than Undyne the Undying (who's very high in the 9-A chain) as they defeated her at just LV 10, and they faced Sans with LV 19 and much better equipment, including full 99 ATK/DEF boost items (with 99 being the ATK and DEF value of Undyne), but Sans still managed to hurt and kill them in the same way.
Yes, it is called chip damage which is what sans doesChara at that point was >>>>> Undyne the Undying.
Dude, no way a 9-B is gonna damage a 9-A.
Mettaton:Yet undertale doesn't do any equivalent of taking 0 damage from massively weaker attacks inverse
LelMettaton:
When Frisk getting the mettaton armour dlc so we can play game journalist mode. LolMettaton:
Sans law hax galactus into attacking firstgalactus punching the air would kill sans
Is Inco for now.So how is this matchup currently?
Is Sans winning or losing?
Is Galactus winning or losing?
I see, Thanks for telling me XDIs Inco for now.
sans law hax is assSans law hax galactus into attacking first
Still effective on this case though XDsans law hax is ass
You know that's a sans thread in a nutshellSans winning against some stronger characters, but losing to the weakest 2-A, it's kind funny
I thought it was proven sans can’t harm himSans can kill him in seconds via Soul manip, Since galactus doesn't have it, He has at best 20 HP where Sans can kill in literal seconds
He din't read the thread.I thought it was proven sans can’t harm him
bro ever since u saw sans destroy db characters u been hatinSo Sans doesn't have neg dura for his normal attacks? So it's just a tier 9 character attack just it always hits?
This was said, So Sans can kill himIn the same thread OP and everyone else agreed it wouldnt affect Sans. So no you are wrong
It's not so much Db characters as much as thinks rubbing me wrong.bro ever since u saw sans destroy db characters u been hatin
Sans can't demage him to do the last attack.This was said, So Sans can kill him
The thread Shion talked about said Sans was an exceptionSans can't demage him to do the last attack.
Like, Karma gonna let Galactus go to one, but then Sans can't do any demage to the last HP.
What? He would be at one hp sans can just oneshot him?That's not what i talking about.
I not questioning Sans dura neg, i saying Karma can't kill Galactus, but just put his HP to 1.
And then Sans can't do demage to Galactus.
Sans in general deals 1 damage per frame. The one that cannot kill is the poison affect. So Karma will down galactus to 1 HP and then Sans will one shot him with any of his attacksThat's not what i talking about.
I not questioning Sans dura neg, i saying Karma can't kill Galactus, but just put his HP to 1.
And then Sans can't do demage to Galactus.
I brought it up, what proof otherwise do you have? The karma that does doesn’t kill, the damage that can’t get past his defense, frisk getting less invulnerability framesHe din't read the thread.
he can’t harm someone if they have infinite durability with bones or blasters only karmaWhat? He would be at one hp sans can just oneshot him?