• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Sans Fights a 2-A Character

Disagree with Karma killing. As someone who has also played the game, I can say from testing that Karma can't kill you. It can only bring you to 1 HP. If you disagree, I don't know what to say. It's what's shown in-game.

This is an untrue statement. It being listed as Durability negation doesn't inherently it can affect those with uncountably infinite superior durability. It being listed as "limited" durability negation should make that abundantly clear.
The damage decreases as durability increases. That doesn't mean you can arbitrarily place a limit of 1 JUST because that's Frisk's cap in dura in-game. If Frisk was Tier 2 in dura? Sure. But that isn't the case. And the minimum is a fraction of 1 going by the Asriel fight.

If having higher finite durability decreases damage, having durability that's uncountably infinitely above would by default take zero damage. Using the minimum damage against Frisk with max and finite durability isn't a detractor of this. And the CRT that is linked to the limited durability negation makes it seem quite clear imo. They were even suggesting removing it altogether, but I suppose it was settled it could be deemed limited instead.
In the same thread OP and everyone else agreed it wouldnt affect Sans. So no you are wrong
 
Stats in UT are not linear, and Chara at that point of the game was way stronger than Undyne the Undying (who's very high in the 9-A chain) as they defeated her at just LV 10, and they faced Sans with LV 19 and much better equipment, including full 99 ATK/DEF boost items (with 99 being the ATK and DEF value of Undyne), but Sans still managed to hurt and kill them in the same way.
Yet undertale doesn't do any equivalent of taking 0 damage from massively weaker attacks inverse
 
Ok so, This is what i pick up so far;

Galactus has size advantage via size manip;

Galactus can summon things to fight for him

He also has energy manip, I don't know how that works

Sans has law hax that makes him able to attack first

Sans can kill him in seconds via Soul manip, Since galactus doesn't have it, He has at best 20 HP where Sans can kill in literal seconds

Sans can TP and has Hell level danmaku + Instinctive action

Can attack during Galactus while he is still choosing what to do via law hax

I'm leaning towards Sans here, If anyone has arguments for Galactus i'm all ears
 
That's not what i talking about.
I not questioning Sans dura neg, i saying Karma can't kill Galactus, but just put his HP to 1.
And then Sans can't do demage to Galactus.
 
That's not what i talking about.
I not questioning Sans dura neg, i saying Karma can't kill Galactus, but just put his HP to 1.
And then Sans can't do demage to Galactus.
Sans in general deals 1 damage per frame. The one that cannot kill is the poison affect. So Karma will down galactus to 1 HP and then Sans will one shot him with any of his attacks
 
Back
Top