When there is 1 MHS feat done by someone who blitzes 99% of the cast and then later in the series the cast becomes fast enough to keep up with them after multiple timeskips of training that is not an outlier, that is linear powerscaling.
Yeah its actually incoherent.
1) DC and Marvel have special scaling rules because they are beyond inconsistent.
I already explained this. It doesn’t matter because it doesn't contradict anything. Especially when you are assuming their at their max speed.
If this is your definition of outlier then you jave gross misunderstanding. Even if I grant this definition, why is it detached? Because it does align with other data right? It doesn't align because it contradicts. If you still disagree then please substantiate why this is a suitable definition.
Keep repeating the same irrelevant point.
Be specific and prove this immediately.
Something that isn't replicated = can't be done? This doesn't even make any sense
Dude this applies to basically every verse ont he wiki. There are almost no verses here that have more than one or two feats on the level of any given tier they have
The justification is the scaling to lightning while she scales to faster than sound attacks.
You missed the point entirely. Also in logic having more points or more evidence doesn't make an argument or proposition more valid. Maybe I'm dumb can you give a coherent argument as to why having feats would add to the validity?
Yes, it was done by the fastest people in the vers at the time who were able to casually outspeed everyone else in the vere including peed ampssuch as Ruby's Petal Burst whichmakes her fast enough to speedblitz Hypersonic+ characters
So are you trying to the feat is inconsistent? Also you can be consistently incorrect. Consistency doesn't make something more valid. At least not inherently. Also you make it sound like they were times where they were trying to most faster than they jave before and still were qualitatively slower. If so, you are welcome to show that but without a statement that's nearly impossible to prove. It doesn't matter if Ruby hasn't had any MHS feats because that doesn't mean she isn't that fast. She scales there, thats it. So please stop mentioning the feat shit its just ad nasuem at this point.
But Ruby later can keep up with those characters and she nor those characters, nor any other character for that matter, perform a feat anywhere even close to MHS ever again.
Like Harriet who is the fastest ACEOPS. (Though she should probably be MHS too but I'm not going to argue that right now)
That doesn't MATTER.
They dont have to, the point is that they did in the first place
They dont hav to do it again, they already did it.
It lines up perfectly with every other feat shown wtf are you talking about. Mercury was faster than her before, she trained, now she can keep up with him. Youre mixing up th definitions of 'outlier' and 'linear progression' here my guy.
They did though? Mercury performed a MHS feat and Ruby scales to him. If we required every character in a verse to have a feat on the same level in order for them to have a certain stat level 99% of our profiles would have Unknown stats.
That'd just mean she progressed to the current Mercury or beyond that. There's no problem with it.
Speedblitzing below mach 15 characters is irrelevant. That is no where near the mhs being proposed, so it isn't evidence for your case.
No. They do not. If we required this it would wipe all stats off of 95% of our profiles.
What do you mean by 'why'? Its consistent because it was performed by people who were the god tiers of the verse at the time
That literally the same feat. Two characters doing it doesn’t matter because that is the one time feat. It doesn’t suddenly become two separate feats both characters did the same thing. If (let’s just go with generic names) bob and James both dodge the same explosion yet consistent travel at subsonic speeds hundreds of time for the rest of the series that doesn’t mean they had two hypersonic feats vs the subsonic feats. That was one hypersonic feat performed by two characters.
No? Its two characters performing two feats with two differnt calculations and two different yields. Its not a single feat at all.
She being on par with Mercury is the problem because neither of them perform a feat similar to the MHS one. She’s grown vastly faster? Why doesn’t she have feats to showcase this, she has crossscaling to a character who also never performs a similar feat ever again.
They don't have shown explicitly to be a certain speed to know they are. Remember these values are just just how we quantify things in the series but they are only interpretations based on induction not canon. So we someone scales higher later we'd interpret that as them improving. To summarize, inverse scaling and calcing goes hand in hand.
Its the onus to prove it is inconsistent, not the other way around.
They
