- 5,166
- 11,748
He's been banned before, though that was 6 years ago.@AppleLord hasn't been warned before, so maybe just a warning?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's been banned before, though that was 6 years ago.@AppleLord hasn't been warned before, so maybe just a warning?
Both in combination, but mostly Fandom.Are you saying this because it will get us in trouble with Fandom or just personal beliefs?
I think others wikis have nazi images on their gallery, don’t they?
Okay then.Seems like it. Took a shot in the dark with the Wolfenstein wiki, they have at least some swastikas (and other Nazi imagery, of course), as well as (perhaps obviously) pages for Hitler in a serious or goofy context.
I don't think it's a terrible idea to choose images without Nazi imagery where available but that's unlikely to be found within canon sources given the nature of the content revolving around depicting nazi imagery, it seems. We should still be fine.
This seems sensible. Thank you for helping out.For the record, unless I'm mistaken:
Terms of Use | Fandom
www.fandom.com
Though given Bambu's post I doubt fandom is really enforcing this stuff Ig.
Anyway, I also think we should try to avoid adding these sorta things to pages if possible. Not that I care much, but it seems a bit wrong to open a page and just be hit with that sorta content.
Maybe a better alternative would be to just include a warning template on the page ?
Agreed.Deleted it. Not fully sure what to do next.
@AppleLord hasn't been warned before, so maybe just a warning?
Man, I don't want to open Bleach General to Apple saying this.
Deleted it. Not fully sure what to do next.
@AppleLord hasn't been warned before, so maybe just a warning?
That may be a good idea, yes.A warning for AppleLord solves this one problem, but I've noticed that this is a recurring issue on the Bleach general discussion thread where inappropriate comments keep getting left by users.
I think that we should consider issuing threads bans in future whenever someone leaves a sexual comment on that thread, just because it has happened so frequently.
RVR Roundup
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
Relevant Comments
- Initial report
- KingTempest's interpretation
- Arguments surrounding it (This insult should be considered a rule violation, this one shouldn't, the comment says other stuff too)
- Comment from Deidalius, the target of Fujiwara's comment
- LordGriffin1000's interpretation
- UchihaSlayer96's interpretation
- Mr._Bambu's interpretation
- Agnaa's interpretation
Staff Views
- No action: 4 (KingTempest, Mr._Bambu, LordGriffin1000, DarkGrath)
- Fujiwara and Deidalius need to stay away from each other: 2 (LordGriffin1000, UchihaSlayer96)
- Warning: 1 (UchihaSlayer96)
- Not inherently opposed to a short ban: 2 (UchihaSlayer96, LordGriffin1000)
- Warning or short ban: 1 (Dereck03)
- Ban: 4 (Damage3245, Agnaa, DarkDragonMedeus, Dereck03)
Staff Actions
I think this merits more input.
- None found
TheGunsFinalWrath
Relevant Comments
- Initial report
- TheGunsFinalWrath's response, followup, followup, followup, followup
- Dereck03's interpretation, followup, followup
- Comment from Udlmaster, the target of TheGunsFinalWrath's comment, followup
- Comment from Dr._whiteee, a person quite involved in the original thread, followup, followup
- KingTempest's interpretation
- Agnaa's interpretation
Staff Views
- No action: 3 (Dereck03, Deagonx, DarkGrath)
- Wouldn't oppose a light warning: 1 (DarkGrath)
- Warning: 2 (Agnaa, DarkDragonMedeus)
Staff Actions
I think this merits more input.
- None found
I can tolerate one's personal opposition and negative mindset against an ideology. However, that is way too far. Straight up permaban, enough said.I'd like to report the user Reio35 for his conduct off-site. Now, I do understand that we need to be careful not to be too liberal with how we handle off-site behavior. That being said, I believe this far crosses the line for what's considered unacceptable by our new standards.
I'll leave a list of what he's said below. Read at your own risk:
Proof that this is Reio35:
- "Being gay makes you less of a man"
- Weird hill to die on...
- Why do you want such a thing...?
- Thanks for wishing harm on people that did nothing wrong I guess...
- This is gross on so many levels...
- This is just vile. Like, utterly vile.
- And so is this...
Given the severity of this, I would like to advocate for an extended (if not permanent, which I think is very well-warranted) ban.
- Evidence #1
- Evidence #2
- In addition, "Sleepy ****" and "Drip" are the same person, and have the same profile picture on Discord (which is Reio's face, hence why I've blacked out his pfp)
Shit's hatespeech calling for violence against an entire group of people, permaban agreed on.I'd like to report the user Reio35 for his conduct off-site. Now, I do understand that we need to be careful not to be too liberal with how we handle off-site behavior. That being said, I believe this far crosses the line for what's considered unacceptable by our new standards.
I'll leave a list of what he's said below. Read at your own risk:
Proof that this is Reio35:
- "Being gay makes you less of a man"
- Weird hill to die on...
- Why do you want such a thing...?
- Thanks for wishing harm on people that did nothing wrong I guess...
- This is gross on so many levels...
- This is just vile. Like, utterly vile.
- And so is this...
Given the severity of this, I would like to advocate for an extended (if not permanent, which I think is very well-warranted) ban.
- Evidence #1
- Evidence #2
- In addition, "Sleepy ****" (yes I know the forum's gonna censor the word, that's fine) and "Drip" are the same person, and have the same profile picture on Discord (which is Reio's face, hence why I've blacked out his pfp)
I got a question since one or two of these older then a year while others are almost a year old, can anything be used against a user no matter how old it is off site?I'd like to report the user Reio35 for his conduct off-site. Now, I do understand that we need to be careful not to be too liberal with how we handle off-site behavior. That being said, I believe this far crosses the line for what's considered unacceptable by our new standards.
I'll leave a list of what he's said below. Read at your own risk:
Proof that this is Reio35:
- "Being gay makes you less of a man"
- Weird hill to die on...
- Why do you want such a thing...?
- Thanks for wishing harm on people that did nothing wrong I guess...
- This is gross on so many levels...
- This is just vile. Like, utterly vile.
- And so is this...
Given the severity of this, I would like to advocate for an extended (if not permanent, which I think is very well-warranted) ban.
- Evidence #1
- Evidence #2
- In addition, "Sleepy ****" (yes I know the forum's gonna censor the word, that's fine) and "Drip" are the same person, and have the same profile picture on Discord (which is Reio's face, hence why I've blacked out his pfp)
Reio has never shown to change or stop insulting others in the meantime, so the past offenses do carry some weight despite how old they are.I got a question since one or two of these older then a year while others are almost a year old, can anything be used against a user no matter how old it is off site?
Okay so it to be a continuous showing of their behavior etc not changing and along with the evidence that guac posted on his post "I'm not sus like Arc and Deceived" type.Reio has never shown to change or stop insulting others in the meantime, so the past offenses do carry some weight despite how old they are.
If I make a racist comment now and keep doing it fot a whole year, on site and off site, then the comment I made now is obviously proof that this behavior is something continuous, so it’s passive of a ban.Okay so it to be a continuous showing of their behavior etc not changing and along with the evidence that guac posted on his post "I'm not sus like Arc and Deceived" type.
Well then.Well, we primarily try to reach a staff consensus, and if that doesn't work out, we try to find a compromise solution to apply.
For the Fujiwara case, I think the closest thing to a compromise would be a warning, emphasizing a need to stay away from Deidalius, so I've left one.Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
Staff Views
- No action: 4 (KingTempest, Mr._Bambu, LordGriffin1000, DarkGrath)
- Fujiwara and Deidalius need to stay away from each other: 2 (LordGriffin1000, UchihaSlayer96)
- Warning: 1 (UchihaSlayer96)
- Not inherently opposed to a short ban: 2 (UchihaSlayer96, LordGriffin1000)
- Warning or short ban: 1 (Dereck03)
- Ban: 4 (Damage3245, Agnaa, DarkDragonMedeus, Dereck03)
For the Guns case, I think due to the lack of compromise, all we can do is take no action.TheGunsFinalWrath
Staff Views
Yep!@Agnaa The recently distributed warnings were added to the warning track?
I most likely haven't seen this earlier, my bad.Some of these outstanding reports need more evaluations to break a deadlock. Pinging 5 random staff members.
@DontTalkDT @ElixirBlue @Theglassman12 @Propellus @SamanPatou.
@Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara @DeidaliusBack when the report had been made, I'd spoken to Fujiwara privately suggesting staying away from Deidalius, an idea she seemed to already be pursuing. I would agree with that course of action as a result.
I am also fine with that solution then.I hadn't noticed TheGunsFinalWrath situation wasn't resolved, given so much dialogue was given on it. I suppose it's a tad late but I would agree with the idea that this can suffice as a warning (informal, off the tracker) to not aggravate others like that in the future.
I would like that, yes.@Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara @Deidalius
Should I make your accounts automatically ignore each other's posts?
Yes, I also want to auto-ignore her.@Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara @Deidalius
Should I make your accounts automatically ignore each other's posts?
I can confirmed I was asked this in DMs, and I privately messaged AKM about it. Hopefully he responds.@BoastJr Is claiming that @Legacy30 is not an alt of theirs.
@AKM sama Pinging you, due to you being the one who implemented the ban.
EDIT: Boast guessed at the reason for the ban, and provided an explanation.
@BoastJr Is claiming that @Legacy30 is not an alt of theirs.
@AKM sama Pinging you, due to you being the one who implemented the ban.
EDIT: Boast guessed at the reason for the ban, and provided an explanation.
EDIT 2: Further evidence
This should be in the Wiki Vandalism Report ThreadDoes anyone know if any recent CRT's for Ninjago were made? Lloyd Garmadon's profile recently got upgraded to 1-C but when I checked the view history all it said was "Inaccuracy and Stupidity". If there weren't any CRT's then this could possibly be vandalism
Edit: Also the 1-C rating only changed on his Tier and Attack Potency. Every other one of his stats (Striking Strength, Durability etc.) is still at Low Multiverse level like it was before the change
Sorry. I didn't know there was a thread for reporting vandalism. Thanks for pointing it out. I'll try to remember to go there next time something like this happensThis should be in the Wiki Vandalism Report Thread