- 11,416
- 2,551
As discussed here, crushing coal into diamond isn't valid for class m lifting strength as it is impossible without breaking the laws of physics.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Grappler Baki Class M lifting strength downgrade
- Thread starter Greatsage13th
- Start date
As discussed here, crushing coal into diamond isn't valid for class m lifting strength as it is impossible without breaking the laws of physics.
- 3,974
- 5,813
No?
- 3,974
- 5,813
Like not only am I 80 percent sure that’s not true. Like the chapter literally explains how Sukune does it
- 16,991
- 12,131
I think he means more so that this is an AP feat rather than LS.Like not only am I 80 percent sure that’s not true. Like the chapter literally explains how Sukune does it
At least that's what I'm getting from the OP and the thread he posted.
- 3,974
- 5,813
Either way the verse already has 2 class K calcs( that we can multiply to M) and potential another on so it’s nothin that extreme.
You sure you want that bro
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #8
Kinda.
Calc stacking... detectedEither way the verse already has 2 class K calcs( that we can multiply to M) and potential another on so it’s nothin that extreme.
You sure you want that bro
- 32,835
- 38,111
Nope, completely unquantifiable as a feat even for AP.
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #10
I mean, is it wrong to give someone heat resistance from crushing coal into diamond?
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #11
Yep.
- 16,991
- 12,131
Yes.Either way the verse already has 2 class K calcs( that we can multiply to M) and potential another on so it’s nothin that extreme.
You sure you want that bro
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #13
Bump
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #14
Someone close this thread, I'm initiating the class m removal at a later time today.
- 26,160
- 3,654
I distinctly remember Baki outright mentioning that it's impossible to crush coal into diamond. What Yujiro did created dust, some of which was sparkly, but he didn't just squeeze the thing and make one, big diamond.
Still, even if he did, it is impossible to quantify, so agree with the downgrade.
Still, even if he did, it is impossible to quantify, so agree with the downgrade.
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #16
Great
- 11,416
- 2,551
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #18
Bump
- 4,270
- 769
Seem simple enough, agreed
- 11,416
- 2,551
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #21
bump
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #22
Someone can apply the downgrade now
- 11,416
- 2,551
- 3,974
- 5,813
Ah shit I forgot this even existed. But anyway if this is the case and Diamond feats are going to be invalid why the **** is Baki the only profile here being affected? I know there are still a ton of other pages that need to have there Diamond feats removed.
Also again I don’t really see a point of this thread considering we have two class K calcs and one class M calc. There still gonna be M if not higher
Also again I don’t really see a point of this thread considering we have two class K calcs and one class M calc. There still gonna be M if not higher
- 16,180
- 13,873
I think it's less about Diamond, and more turning coal into diamond.
Personally I'd still go with the pressure aspect of the feat even if other facets of it like heat don't check out, given the intent of the scene was to show he has an absolutely ******* stupid grip strength, as in, it's intended to be a LS feat. It defies some physics but the pressure should still be ok as that's what the author is trying to convey.
But that's just my opinion, could maybe just slap a "likely far higher" and call it a day if it's truly unquantifiable.
Personally I'd still go with the pressure aspect of the feat even if other facets of it like heat don't check out, given the intent of the scene was to show he has an absolutely ******* stupid grip strength, as in, it's intended to be a LS feat. It defies some physics but the pressure should still be ok as that's what the author is trying to convey.
But that's just my opinion, could maybe just slap a "likely far higher" and call it a day if it's truly unquantifiable.
- 3,974
- 5,813
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #27
Bumo
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #29
Bumo
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #30
Bump
- 168,521
- 77,242
FictUnderstand
He/Him- 103
- 29
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #34
Thats the calc we are attempting to reject
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #35
Bump
- 168,521
- 77,242
@KLOL506 @Dark-Carioca @Therefir @Executor_N0 @Antoniofer @Ugarik
Should we remove the scaling to this feat then?
- 32,835
- 38,111
100% should be removed.
- 11,416
- 2,551
- Thread starter
- #39
Bump
Similar threads
