- 177,639
- 90,662
- Thread starter
- #25,681
Both in combination, but mostly Fandom.Are you saying this because it will get us in trouble with Fandom or just personal beliefs?
I think others wikis have nazi images on their gallery, don’t they?
Okay then.Seems like it. Took a shot in the dark with the Wolfenstein wiki, they have at least some swastikas (and other Nazi imagery, of course), as well as (perhaps obviously) pages for Hitler in a serious or goofy context.
I don't think it's a terrible idea to choose images without Nazi imagery where available but that's unlikely to be found within canon sources given the nature of the content revolving around depicting nazi imagery, it seems. We should still be fine.
This seems sensible. Thank you for helping out.For the record, unless I'm mistaken:
Terms of Use | Fandom
www.fandom.com
Though given Bambu's post I doubt fandom is really enforcing this stuff Ig.
Anyway, I also think we should try to avoid adding these sorta things to pages if possible. Not that I care much, but it seems a bit wrong to open a page and just be hit with that sorta content.
Maybe a better alternative would be to just include a warning template on the page ?
Agreed.Deleted it. Not fully sure what to do next.
@AppleLord hasn't been warned before, so maybe just a warning?
Last edited by a moderator: