-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
Arcker123
He/Him- 7,426
- 5,192
Deagonx is referring to user @LordGinSama and his multiple attempts to offer a solution to this conflict. I will post his words here as I find it useful to help conclude this matter.
- 4,022
- 3,703
I gotta agree with Garri on this. While Arcker was by far a more toxic element throughout the entire argument, that does not excuse Deagonx's behavior throughout. Especially as a thread mod, letting that grow as it did as a participant in the discussion shows a failing on both parties.
A warning should've been given a while into that argument, so let's just give it now and have it as a notch for a later. Anything more than that isn't fitting in my eyes
A warning should've been given a while into that argument, so let's just give it now and have it as a notch for a later. Anything more than that isn't fitting in my eyes
Last edited:
- 15,279
- 15,444
My thoughts are pretty much the same.
- 1,655
- 2,567
I share the same sentiments as Duedate as well.
- 29,780
- 24,818
Okay. Let's consider the matter settled.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 21,576
- 19,000
This thread is not staff only. However, input is only necessary from people directly related to the report, and staff. We don't need a million voices leaning in to remind us that they, too, feel they have been wronged by Deagon pursuing his duties.
From the given statements quoted by either side, Arcker is the aggressor here, a fact I feel is too frequently true: Deagon has a bad reputation, and thus many users seem to feel it is acceptable to dogpile him and cite upvotes as a meter of correctness. The idea is absurd and yet was quoted in this very thread, in this very incident. The problems with this are only exacerbated by the fact that Arcker has, indeed, been banned on the grounds of hostility relatively recently, something we are very slow to pursue.
I do not want to ban Arcker for this shit. I'd like everyone to walk away peacefully and have an understanding of each other, because for *****' sake people need to stop starting screaming matches over such inane topics. A warning is acceptable, and I want this known for the people referring to it: Deagon is following the letter of the rule in 95% of the instances where he deletes a message. Our rules, as they are written, have almost entirely supported his actions. Most of us operate from the spirit of the rule, the intention, wherein unobtrusive messages do not always need deleted, and so we allow it, even though our policies would technically forbid it. Deagon is not deleting messages "because he feels like it", and this feels like a deliberate misinterpretation of the reality of the situation.
Settle down and play nice, please. I'm sick of returning to this topic.
From the given statements quoted by either side, Arcker is the aggressor here, a fact I feel is too frequently true: Deagon has a bad reputation, and thus many users seem to feel it is acceptable to dogpile him and cite upvotes as a meter of correctness. The idea is absurd and yet was quoted in this very thread, in this very incident. The problems with this are only exacerbated by the fact that Arcker has, indeed, been banned on the grounds of hostility relatively recently, something we are very slow to pursue.
I do not want to ban Arcker for this shit. I'd like everyone to walk away peacefully and have an understanding of each other, because for *****' sake people need to stop starting screaming matches over such inane topics. A warning is acceptable, and I want this known for the people referring to it: Deagon is following the letter of the rule in 95% of the instances where he deletes a message. Our rules, as they are written, have almost entirely supported his actions. Most of us operate from the spirit of the rule, the intention, wherein unobtrusive messages do not always need deleted, and so we allow it, even though our policies would technically forbid it. Deagon is not deleting messages "because he feels like it", and this feels like a deliberate misinterpretation of the reality of the situation.
Settle down and play nice, please. I'm sick of returning to this topic.
- 165,143
- 72,068
- Thread starter
- #24,730
Thank you to everybody who helped us to reach a solution to this situation. 
I also think that a warning is all that is necessary for Arcker here, and that quite a lot of members seem to dislike Deagonx due to that he has been a bit overzealous with deleting even useful comments, closing threads, and preventing other members from responding. As Bambu said, he is not breaking our rules, but most of our staff members try to act based on the spirit/intentions of our rules, rather than continuously going as far in their enforcement as is technically permitted, so that is definitely something for Deagonx to try to take into careful serious consideration before engaging in such behaviour in the future.
I also think that a warning is all that is necessary for Arcker here, and that quite a lot of members seem to dislike Deagonx due to that he has been a bit overzealous with deleting even useful comments, closing threads, and preventing other members from responding. As Bambu said, he is not breaking our rules, but most of our staff members try to act based on the spirit/intentions of our rules, rather than continuously going as far in their enforcement as is technically permitted, so that is definitely something for Deagonx to try to take into careful serious consideration before engaging in such behaviour in the future.
- 10,771
- 18,692
Well, Garrixian's suggestion which seems to be the one that the staffs finally agreed on was to give a warning to both Arcker and Deagon, the warning was already given to Arcker when it was added to the warning tracker, but according to Deagon his "warning" should be discussed with HR.
- 7,226
- 13,084
The whole thing with comment deletion is a bit off-topic to the primary incident, but I'll speak on it briefly here because it has come up a lot, and I've mostly avoided saying much on it because it is not the focal point of the discussions where it has been brought up, such as this one.
As Bambu said, my intention is to follow the letter of the rule when I delete comments, it isn't personal. Just as I deleted Gin's comment providing his proposal, I deleted an earlier comment which chastised Arcker's actions even though (obviously) I agreed with it. When it comes to RVRT the flow chart for what comments are allowed is fairly simple, so a lot of comments end up getting deleted. When I became a mod, unhelpful RVR comments was somewhat of a focus for me, because I'd seen a lot of RVR debacles get entirely out of hand largely due to unhelpful interjections from people who had no business being here other than the fact that they wanted to participate in the ongoing drama, which just made already messy situations even messier. This is an issue because the RVR is often the primary avenue to get staff assistance in dealing with a user who is being persistently rude to them, such as the situation above.
Similarly, in many CRTs that involve controversial verses (or are made by controversial users) it's common to see just as many off-topic/low-effort jokes as actual responses to the discussion. In a recent Boros CRT I literally deleted half of the existing comments, because at the time of me reading the thread half of the comments were just people shitposting. This is also an issue, because the longer a CRT goes on and the more cluttered it gets, the harder it becomes to persuade staff to come and evaluate it and help it reach a satisfactory conclusion, which can be really frustrating for a well-meaning OP who is just trying to get well-reasoned changes made.
These are both issues I felt frustrated with when I was a user, so they are issues I've tried to help with as a member of staff. That isn't to say I've never had errors in judgment, I'm a human being and relative to a lot of the staff I am fairly new to this. However, it isn't something I do out of personal whimsy, it is always out of a sincere belief that a comment has broken a rule.
I have taken the feedback on it seriously and have applied more discretion, which may not be obvious because the absence of action rarely looks like action, but it is something I genuinely have taken into consideration, and I've regularly pursued input from admins in situations where the line is unclear, and I intend to make an effort to be more communicative as Agnaa has suggested about why comments are being deleted.
- 165,143
- 72,068
- Thread starter
- #24,734
Well, deleting derailing shitposting and maintaining some reasonable degree of polite and orderly conduct is perfectly fine, whereas you have to be careful to not delete constructive comments that happen to disagree with you or apply instant permanent thread bans for generally well-behaved members who have committed a minor offence, so attempting to gauge where to draw a reasonable line to not become too draconian should be a good continuous focus of effort.
- 165,143
- 72,068
- Thread starter
- #24,735
@Dereck03
So should we apply a 1 month ban to @Mizuki67 and @Jozaysmith? or let them go with a warning this time?
- 3,230
- 7,898
They already stated themselves they won’t report Dereck. And Dereck said it themselves if he’s getting reported, we agreed to let him know what he’s being accused of before making such punishments. This can be dropped, however, @Antvasima three staff members already advocated for the ban of Jozaysmith and Mizuki prior to this incident; that should be taken into consideration.
Jozaysmith?
He/Him- 2,420
- 529
I thought the one year ban thing was because of what we called dereck off site (which it was)
However no staff that declared one month or one year ban prior to this case have given their thoughts on the cleared and misunderstood issue
Well the sock puppet thing was cleared off as a warning and was added to our warning tracker well we didn't have any case prior to this sockpuppet thingy so its our first time getting warned
- 3,230
- 7,898
@Deagonx @Maverick_Zero_X @Qawsedf234 All were supportive of an one year ban after things were cleared up about all the accounts sharing.
Jozaysmith?
He/Him- 2,420
- 529
I remember explaining the situation but they didn't reply
So i think bumping this case is a good idea, the old proposals was because i and @Mizuki67 was suspected to be the same user which we cleared out with @GarrixianXD on Discord that even @AKM sama and @Antvasima agreed and Confirmed not to be sock
We agreed that we should ban my previous account named @Starfeldway which was taken later it was also suspected that we did the same thing again which we repeatedly prove we didn't, and the whole sockpuppet thing on fandom is a one time thing
moving on, the punishable offenses we carried out were offsite which we agree to move away from after we apologize and decide to move past from i personally asked @Antvasima on DM that he should help me settle things in other words i wanted to apologize given the way i acted i honestly felt it might be a waste of time but seeing the way @GarrixianXD is i decided to do so even if am not forgiven i can clear the bad name and behavior of all the thing i said and did offsite, Reason is because We felt our thread was being jumped on which was a false accusation which @Mr._Bambu warned me on not to place false accusation on users of this forumLastly, Which might be a useless remark I Have no alter motions towards people on this wiki not any mods not any members most things are emotional outburst of a teenage boy just raging online so i apologize for that also on behalf of @Mizuki67 who called dereck the P word, although very uncalled for it was just a teenage offsite outburst we do not and will not mean any harm to any staff here and would not do anything to get any staff punished or so by saying things they didn't do, Honestly doubt we can anways,
Last edited:
- 32,811
- 37,997
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...
Yeah uh I don't think that's appropriate at all here.
- 371
- 111
Bro It doesnt violate any rules (Yes I read them) plus I seen worse jokes on this site that didnt get reportedCan there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...vsbattles.com
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...
Yeah uh I don't think that's appropriate at all here.
- 29,780
- 24,818
Very inappropriate, yeah. At the very least they should be deleted and the user given a warning.
- 29,780
- 24,818
One of our rule sections under Site Rules is "Be Appropriate":
- Being sexually flirtatious will not be tolerated. Playing mature games, flirting, or using sexual connotations is discouraged, and in extreme cases, will result in a severe penalty.
- 32,811
- 37,997
DON'T EVEN START.
- 371
- 111
Types of Jokes that Violate rules are Doxxing, Threatening, and etc that are like borderline weird bro.Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...
Yeah uh I don't think that's appropriate at all here.
- 10,771
- 18,692
Ok, ngnl, it gave got me a little creeped out and cringe to see those messages, I deleted them because they are troll asf.Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...
Yeah uh I don't think that's appropriate at all here.
- 29,780
- 24,818
@TaiwaneseScaler Take the warning, or take a ban, it's as simple as that.
And stop posting here if you've got nothing relevant to say.
And stop posting here if you've got nothing relevant to say.
- 29,780
- 24,818
TaiwaneseScaler keeps posting in this thread despite warnings and having his posts deleted, so I've banned him on the forum for a day out of necessity to stop the spam.
We'll see if he can behave after 24 hours.
We'll see if he can behave after 24 hours.
- 9,055
- 9,317
They are not:
The issue isn't serious enough to warrant even a warning, but good thing the comment was deleted.
- 14,692
- 20,447
Apparently that Q&A thread isn’t the only time they posted a sexually flirtatious message out of nowhere:
The Boys small upgrade
This calc was accepted bringing Ryan's speed from Unknown to Superhuman and his striking strength from Unknown to Wall level+
So a stern warning sounds appropriate.
Last edited:
- 32,811
- 37,997
I don't think he will, look at what he said here.
- 3,230
- 7,898
A final warning sounds good. If they still misbehave after that, it’s a boot for them.
- 9,740
- 12,603
Admittedly, I think just giving them the boot is fair enough right now. All of their comments before the warning and responses to the warning don’t suggest this user’s going to take the policies seriously
TWILIGHT-OP
He/Him- 2,411
- 1,182
I think @Damage3245 already gave him 1day ban.
- 9,901
- 3,668
I noticed that taiwanesescaler keeps derailing and tries to be funny in like 90% of threads that are meant to be serious
vsbattles.com
randomly said "Yep. This is Boundless for sure. mhm" in a transduality CRT
vsbattles.com
"Huesito whimpering audio boutta go crazy."
like wtf??
vsbattles.com
"Yea this is Boundless close the thread make the changes promote the OP to staff. Actually give em the entire vsbw site"
vsbattles.com
"Thats gotta be an Immeasurable speed feat with Type 5 Acausalty with Soul Manipulation, Biological Manipulation, Telepathy, Cosmic Awareness and Precognition and Fate Manipulation, Immortality (Types 1 and 4") in a speed crt
he already got in trouble for leaking an ip address and he does unnecessary stuff like this
there is more
Expanding Arceus Transduality Justification
Transduality (Nature 2, Aspect 2; They are the "God who transcends everything", that is both a part of everything and outside everything, beyond both time and space and the Distortion world having percieved them into creation. The Distortion World being nothingness that is a reverse of the...
Saitama VS Goku • (1-1-0)
Did anyone else vote? I mean, sure, but Saitama's growth is exponential lol. By the time he reaches a SSJ transformation it's pretty much over for Goku I would say. Vote for Goku
like wtf??
Granblue Fantasy small Cosmology tweak (new story)
Yea this is Boundless close the thread make the changes promote the OP to staff. Actually give em the entire vsbw site
Gotta go fast!
There’s NOTHING that implies that he became ftl in the last chapter. The most acceptable ideia is that he already was at his last appearence. There’s no visible buff, no statement… There is nothing that directly implies he was FTL when he had his skirmish with Tatsumaki either.
he already got in trouble for leaking an ip address and he does unnecessary stuff like this
there is more
Last edited:
TWILIGHT-OP
He/Him- 2,411
- 1,182
Yeah true, going through his recent msgs there a lot of msgs like theseI noticed that taiwanesescaler keeps derailing and tries to be funny in like 90% of threads that are meant to be serious
randomly said "Yep. This is Boundless for sure. mhm" in a transduality CRTExpanding Arceus Transduality Justification
Transduality (Nature 2, Aspect 2; They are the "God who transcends everything", that is both a part of everything and outside everything, beyond both time and space and the Distortion world having percieved them into creation. The Distortion World being nothingness that is a reverse of the...
"Huesito whimpering audio boutta go crazy."Saitama VS Goku • (1-1-0)
Did anyone else vote? I mean, sure, but Saitama's growth is exponential lol. By the time he reaches a SSJ transformation it's pretty much over for Goku I would say. Vote for Goku
like wtf??
"Yea this is Boundless close the thread make the changes promote the OP to staff. Actually give em the entire vsbw site"Granblue Fantasy small Cosmology tweak (new story)
Yea this is Boundless close the thread make the changes promote the OP to staff. Actually give em the entire vsbw site
there is more
For black winter
I see that black winter does not have a profile and I scaled it accordingly in cosmology and as a result I made this profile. I want vsbw to use this profile for black winter https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:Roirr/Sandbox?useskin=fandomdesktop#Powers_and_Stats Agree:LordTracer, Elizio33...
Similar threads
