Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here's my two cents, I had a situation like this with WeeklyBattles years ago. On every thread we'd interact on, it'd turn into a whole ordeal, ending with one of us in the RVR thread after awhile.
I'd say this is a similar case, Acker and Deagonx are like oil and water. The two clearly do not mix, so instead of being here every week over this, simply try not to interact with one another. If Acrker makes a thread then Deagonx can try his best not to comment on it and vice versa.
Most of the time these reports aren't even rule violations and is just two users refusing to admit defeat which often turns into a shit show. Doubt any of us want to be here for a weekly Deagonx Acker fight.
My thoughts are pretty much the same.I gotta agree with Garry on this. While Arcker was by far a more toxic elment throughout the entire argument, that does not excuse Deagonix's behavior throughout. Especially as a thread mod, letting that grow as it did as a participant in the discussion shows a failing on both parties.
A warning should've been given a while into that argument, so let's just give it now and have as a notch for a later. Anything more than that isn't fitting in my eyes
The whole thing with comment deletion is a bit off-topic to the primary incident, but I'll speak on it briefly here because it has come up a lot, and I've mostly avoided saying much on it because it is not the focal point of the discussions where it has been brought up, such as this one.As Bambu said, he is not breaking our rules, but most of our staff members try to act based on the spirit/intentions of our rules, rather than continuously going as far in their enforcement as is technically permitted, so that is definitely something for Deagonx to try to take into careful serious consideration before engaging in such behaviour in the future.
@Dereck03So would the rest of you here be fine with if we ignore this latest event, and return to the punishment for the original offenses, which was 1 month if I recall correctly?
They already stated themselves they won’t report Dereck. And Dereck said it themselves if he’s getting reported, we agreed to let him know what he’s being accused of before making such punishments. This can be dropped, however, @Antvasima three staff members already advocated for the ban of Jozaysmith and Mizuki prior to this incident; that should be taken into consideration.I didn't report anyone or come to wiki and say i want to report anyone again stop carrying offsite claims to wiki honestly this is becoming a pain in the ass
I only said in Discord That "Now that i get to see all the nonsense they have been saying i get to report them" Have i reported you?
Did i come to wiki to report you?
No, please let's drop the matter If you want me report the case on the other server members then please specify I can report all of them here
which is seriously prolonging this issue and i seriously don't want that if you do then its your choice.
I thought the one year ban thing was because of what we called dereck off site (which it was)They already stated themselves they won’t report Dereck. And Dereck said it themselves if he’s getting reported, we agreed to let him know what he’s being accused of before making such punishments. This can be dropped, however, @Antvasima three staff members already advocated for the ban of Jozaysmith and Mizuki prior to this incident; that should be taken into consideration.
@Deagonx @Maverick_Zero_X @Qawsedf234 All were supportive of an one year ban after things were cleared up about all the accounts sharing.I thought the one year ban thing was because of what we called dereck off site (which it was)
However no staff that declared one month or one year ban prior to this case have given their thoughts on the cleared and misunderstood issue
Bro It doesnt violate any rules (Yes I read them) plus I seen worse jokes on this site that didnt get reportedCan there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...vsbattles.comCan there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...vsbattles.comCan there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...vsbattles.com
Yeah uh I don't think that's appropriate at all here.
Very inappropriate, yeah. At the very least they should be deleted and the user given a warning.Yeah uh I don't think that's appropriate at all here.
One of our rule sections under Site Rules is "Be Appropriate":Bro It doesnt violate any rules (Yes I read them) plus I seen worse jokes on this site that didnt get reported
DON'T EVEN START.Bro It doesnt violate any rules (Yes I read them) plus I seen worse jokes on this site that didnt get reported
Types of Jokes that Violate rules are Doxxing, Threatening, and etc that are like borderline weird bro.Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...vsbattles.comCan there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...vsbattles.comCan there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...vsbattles.com
Yeah uh I don't think that's appropriate at all here.
Ok, ngnl, it gave got me a little creeped out and cringe to see those messages, I deleted them because they are troll asf.Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...vsbattles.comCan there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...vsbattles.comCan there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality?
Can there be multiple degrees of Type 5 Acausality in the same verse? As in, say something transcends the causal system of a universe and exists on a higher plane. So it operates on that higher plane's causal system, yet it still transcends the one below them. Would this be Type 5, or still...vsbattles.com
Yeah uh I don't think that's appropriate at all here.
They are not:Not sure if posts like this are allowed.
Derogatory comments on religious or political matters (both highly sensitive issues) will not be tolerated, as it almost always leads to massive hate-commenting and negativity. Doing so will result in a deletion of the post, and possibly a ban, depending on the severity.
Apparently that Q&A thread isn’t the only time they posted a sexually flirtatious message out of nowhere:One of our rule sections under Site Rules is "Be Appropriate":
- Being sexually flirtatious will not be tolerated. Playing mature games, flirting, or using sexual connotations is discouraged, and in extreme cases, will result in a severe penalty.
I don't think he will, look at what he said here.TaiwaneseScaler keeps posting in this thread despite warnings and having his posts deleted, so I've banned him on the forum for a day out of necessity to stop the spam.
We'll see if he can behave after 24 hours.
Admittedly, I think just giving them the boot is fair enough right now. All of their comments before the warning and responses to the warning don’t suggest this user’s going to take the policies seriouslyA final warning sounds good. If they still misbehave after that, it’s a boot for them.
I think @Damage3245 already gave him 1day ban.A final warning sounds good. If they still misbehave after that, it’s a boot for them.
Yeah true, going through his recent msgs there a lot of msgs like theseI noticed that taiwanesescaler keeps derailing and tries to be funny in like 90% of threads that are meant to be serious
randomly said "Yep. This is Boundless for sure. mhm" in a transduality CRTExpanding Arceus Transduality Justification
Transduality (Nature 2, Aspect 2; They are the "God who transcends everything", that is both a part of everything and outside everything, beyond both time and space and the Distortion world having percieved them into creation. The Distortion World being nothingness that is a reverse of the...vsbattles.com
"Huesito whimpering audio boutta go crazy."Saitama VS Goku • (1-1-0)
Did anyone else vote? I mean, sure, but Saitama's growth is exponential lol. By the time he reaches a SSJ transformation it's pretty much over for Goku I would say. Vote for Gokuvsbattles.com
like wtf??
"Yea this is Boundless close the thread make the changes promote the OP to staff. Actually give em the entire vsbw site"Granblue Fantasy small Cosmology tweak (new story)
Yea this is Boundless close the thread make the changes promote the OP to staff. Actually give em the entire vsbw sitevsbattles.com
there is more