- 3,530
- 1,968
First of all i made that explanation page for explain further about deepened. I already write in the conclusion of the blog what ability that the deepened will get@Fixxed So you're telling me that you're completely fine with using a blog that had little to no explanation for all of the stuff you claimed in the end just because it was accepted, despite the fact the Admins who did accept it barely knew what was the actual intent of the upgrade. You do realize this is a violation of one of the rules in content revision right? More specifically this.
Not only was the staff not on the same page since they had no idea what you were trying to push but you never once explained the infinite 6-D layers that would be applied to Anos, plus again the arguments you provided in said blog did not prove layered hax or resistance negation layers or anything like that, so you're being dishonest as **** right now.
- The opening post of a content revision thread has to include a clear summary in the opening post what major changes are being made so that everyone involved in the discussion will be on the same page. For example, if an updated profile has been created in a sandbox with a new Power & Abilities section, then you should summarize or bullet point in the opening post the major changes that are being proposed so that people don't overlook them.
Two, my explanation page is just to explain that deepened mean layered, the major change is deepened=layered, i already say the infinitely layer is come from the scan that say infinitely deepened, it not come from that explanation blog
But because deepened mean layered it clearly mean infinitely layered
Again and again that blog for explain deepened=layered
The infinitely layered is result of there are scan that clearly proof about infinitely deepened