- 25,632
- 15,962
I think they should be given a warning, just a reminder for 1 don’t make changes until the CRT has been accepted and 2 make sure to add a link to it once it’s been accepted.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 167,857
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #17,842
- 25,632
- 15,962
No problemBig thanks to everybody who are helping out here by the way.
- 25,632
- 15,962
Sounds like a troll
- 18,393
- 14,323
I have reverted the edit.
- 6,236
- 6,521
Reverted the edit.
DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 17,847
- 15,275
Lol SuperStar speed blitzed us.
But yeah it's presumably a troll or they forgot to link a CRT.
But yeah it's presumably a troll or they forgot to link a CRT.
- 25,632
- 15,962
I don’t remember any CRT’s involving tier 0 revengers so I’m 100% sure it’s definitely the former
- 25,632
- 15,962
Thank you for your help Dereck
- 18,393
- 14,323
I am filing a complaint against @Fixxed for misusing the system and deliberately attempting to harm the community in the verse.
I will provide additional details to clarify my point.
@Fixxed started a thread without clearly discussing a crucial aspect of a well-known light novel character, Anos. The original intention was not related to the infinite layers argument, but rather focused on exploring the works within the verse.
In a versus thread, @Fixxed's arguments were not accepted, and the decision was in Anos's favor (victory – for having 6D infinite layers/AP)
To be clear, the only accepted thread that comprehensively covers everything is the one I created, which ranges from 2-A to 6D baseline. It was accepted that Anos has 99 · countless layers of hax, but not infinite layers.
However, the thread in question was concluded within a mere two days without adequate input or addressing the matter at hand.
Certain staff members tentatively supported the thread without realizing the implications. Notably, no member with substantial knowledge in the MG area, such as @Dereck03 or @Oblivion_Of_The_Endless, was involved in the discussion.
In conclusion
I will provide additional details to clarify my point.
@Fixxed started a thread without clearly discussing a crucial aspect of a well-known light novel character, Anos. The original intention was not related to the infinite layers argument, but rather focused on exploring the works within the verse.
In a versus thread, @Fixxed's arguments were not accepted, and the decision was in Anos's favor (victory – for having 6D infinite layers/AP)
Nowhere is this an accepted argument in VSBW and has never been addressed properly
To be clear, the only accepted thread that comprehensively covers everything is the one I created, which ranges from 2-A to 6D baseline. It was accepted that Anos has 99 · countless layers of hax, but not infinite layers.
- Explanation Page (which is accepted by two admins vaguely)
- vague, poorly made, and contained grammatical errors.
- The intentionally vague thread was the last accepted submission.
- The last accepted proper thread
However, the thread in question was concluded within a mere two days without adequate input or addressing the matter at hand.
Certain staff members tentatively supported the thread without realizing the implications. Notably, no member with substantial knowledge in the MG area, such as @Dereck03 or @Oblivion_Of_The_Endless, was involved in the discussion.
In conclusion
- A hastily conducted and highly controversial CRT that failed to address the main point appropriately
- Manipulation of arguments
- A manipulation of standards
- An unjust match conclusion with dishonest intentions.
- The admins who agreed themselves were never aware of the main premise behind the blog
- The fact that he implied the existence of infinite layers in his previous thread indicates that he either never reviewed or failed to establish the thread's premise.
Last edited:
- 12,450
- 5,641
TLDR: The staff agreed with this CRT, thinking it was an explanation page, without knowing its actually an infinite layered 6D hax page. (The true intension of the CRT)
- 20,083
- 10,871
If that was what the true intent of that thread was, then yeah this is a massive violation on the wiki as he's basically lying by pushing for something that wasn't even accepted in the thread. Doesn't help the staff didn't know this was about infinite layers.
- 18,393
- 14,323
My recommendation is to impose a general CRTs ban or a topic ban (all MG CRTs) on discussing it, given the observed behavior, which constitutes a significant breach of regulations pertaining to circumventing contentious themes within the verse and their influence on match outcomes.
Specifically, the user in question employed this argument to secure victory in one of the matches, which is highly deceitful and unacceptable.
Specifically, the user in question employed this argument to secure victory in one of the matches, which is highly deceitful and unacceptable.
- 3,693
- 2,061
Ahh thisI am filing a complaint against @Fixxed for misusing the system and deliberately attempting to harm the community in the verse.
I will provide additional details to clarify my point.
@Fixxed started a thread without clearly discussing a crucial aspect of a well-known light novel character, Anos. The original intention was not related to the infinite layers argument, but rather focused on exploring the works within the verse.
In a versus thread, @Fixxed's arguments were not accepted, and the decision was in Anos's favor (victory – for having 6D infinite layers/AP)
Nowhere is this an accepted argument in VSBW and has never been addressed properly
To be clear, the only accepted thread that comprehensively covers everything is the one I created, which ranges from 2-A to 6D baseline. It was accepted that Anos has 99 · countless layers of hax, but not infinite layers.
It is crucial to note that threads of this nature require extensive and thoughtful discussion.
- Explanation Page(which is accepted by two admins vaguely)
- vague, poorly made, and contained grammatical errors.
- The intentionally vague thread was the last accepted submission.
- The last accepted proper thread
However, the thread in question was concluded within a mere two days without adequate input or addressing the matter at hand.
Certain staff members tentatively supported the thread without realizing the implications. Notably, no member with substantial knowledge in the MG area, such as @Dereck03 or @Oblivion_Of_The_Endless, was involved in the discussion.
In conclusion
- A hastily conducted and highly controversial CRT that failed to address the main point appropriately
- Manipulation of arguments
- A manipulation of standards
- An unjust match conclusion with dishonest intentions.
- The admins who agreed themselves were never aware of the main premise behind the blog
Again and again,
First i already say that arnos already have infinitely deepened's statement that already accepted in this thread. But that thread is not explain further about deepened work in the verse, about deepened can be layered,so the one that just accepted is just
INFINITELY DEEPENED STATEMENT OF ARNOS' ROOT
And then i make explanation page, for explain further about deepened, and it accepted in this thread, i already stated claerly that deepened will have higher resistence and resistence negation or layered to all the previous power
The premises:
- Arnos' root is can deepened infinitely
- Deepened means layered
● ARNOS IS CAN LAYERED INFINITELY
Bruh this is simple logic
That thread is just for explain further about deepened. So why i must brought the infinitely layer thing in that???
And then someone is ask for the where the 6D hax come from??
That already accepted in this thread , that every ability from arnos' chaos root it will scale to the venuzdonoa and arnos' root it self can destroy the silver sea that is 6D
Now we have 3 premise
- Arnos' root is can deepened infinitely
- Deepened means layered
- Arnos root' ability it scale to the 6D level
The conclusion is
Arnos is can infinitely layered 6D ability
- 15,881
- 12,239
I thought the explanation blog was simply made to provide a more detailed explination of what was already accepted on the profiles. Obviously, the knowledgeable members of that verse should have gotten a chance to comment. I apologize for causing trouble with my hasty conclusion on the matter but Fixxed should have a chance to explain (Edit: Fixxed commented above)
- 3,693
- 2,061
Yeah that thread is just for explain further about deepened, why i say it infinitely layer not simply because that thread but there are more CRT that already accepted to support that
- 18,393
- 14,323
The discussion was brought to an end in just two days, with no expert members expressing agreement. The only ones who accepted the argument were the administrators, who themselves acknowledged not being familiar with the verse. Additionally, the concept of 6D infinite layers AP/hax has never been acknowledged in any previous discussions
- 18,393
- 14,323
Don't spam with this since nothing here is accepted in a proper manner and nothing has been addressed or discussed even.
Hell, I asked Dereck and UMR myself and they were never aware of this at all.
- 18,393
- 14,323
And no need to spam, let staff members handle this. This became hilarious.
- 3,693
- 2,061
Bruh that CRT is already being accepted, and we get fact
We combine tha fact (premises) and have conclusion
Your point is say, i say infinite layer because of that explanation page, that is false, the explanation page is just for explain further about deepened. I claim it infinitely layer because of premises of the previous thread
- 12,450
- 5,641
That still doesn't change the fact that NO ONE knew about the infinite layer hax thing which is a MASSIVE UPGRADE FOR ANOS.
- 18,393
- 14,323
I would like to point out that no thread has ever thoroughly examined the topic of 6D infinite layered AP/hax.
Furthermore, your conclusion lacks logical validity. Merging various assumptions without justification does not suffice as a sound argument. Moreover, Null, who originally presented the scan, did not intend to suggest that Anos possessed an infinite layered AP, much less a higher dimensional one. This concept is entirely novel to the MG community and appears to be a fabrication.
I will refrain from debating this issue any further.
- 3,693
- 2,061
I already give my explanation, it because premises in the previous thread
there are no problem someone know or not, just read my explanation and debunk if you see a problem
- 3,693
- 2,061
First
I just take the statement of infinitely deepened from null's scan, i dont say he suggest infinite AP or blablbal
Just take the fact that there are a proof of infinitely deepened
And then deepened mean layered
With simple fundamental logic is mean
Infinitely layered
- 12,450
- 5,641
You can stop talking about the actual upgrade in this thread. This is not the thread for that. Talk about WHY you called your own CRT an explanation page when its actually an infinite layer Anos upgrade.
- 20,083
- 10,871
@Fixxed the 2 year old CRT you linked had little to no connection to it being infinite layers of hax, plus the recent one you made gave no indication to the potency of the hax for Anos at all, the fact you’re pulling this to make Anos win against some random Low 1-C character is just baffling to say the least.
- 3,693
- 2,061
No, the 2 years old CRT is i use to prove the infinitely deepened , so it had connection because the deepened part
The recent it just to prove that deepened is layered, i already write that deepened will get higher resistence and resistence negation to every previous power of that person or magic before deepened, and it already get accepted is mean we can use it
And fact that arnos can infinitely deepened is mean arnos have higher resistence and resistence negation to all his previous power and he can do that infinitely, mean higher infinitely resistence and resistence negation
- 3,693
- 2,061
Because its just to explain about the deepened
The infinitely layer is come from the premises or the fact of some previous threads, it not come from that thread
That thread is just for prove that deepened is mean layered, for arnos' infinitely layer is come from the scan that say arnos can infinitely deepened
DaMonkeMan
He/Him- 17,847
- 15,275
Can you just, not spam the thread with all that?
Let them gather their selves and give a detailed counter-argument before you start talking again. Saves ya time and energy.
Let them gather their selves and give a detailed counter-argument before you start talking again. Saves ya time and energy.
- 20,083
- 10,871
@Fixxed Your blog literally did not explain that whatsoever. All that's mentioned is that someone's magic power grows stronger when they're close to death and that someone can just amp magic spells to make them stronger than normal. Nothing about this blog remotely proves, in your own words "higher resistance and resistance negation also power nullification and negation to power nullification to all it/him-her previous power (the power before being deepened)". Especially for Anos of all people having infinite layered hax on a 6-D level. For extraordinary claims like this you're gonna need extraordinary evidence to back it up.
The more and more you're pushing for this the less I'm willing to take your word because it seems like you're just twisting the conclusions to get what you want.
The more and more you're pushing for this the less I'm willing to take your word because it seems like you're just twisting the conclusions to get what you want.
- 3,693
- 2,061
Bruh that not the problem, the fact that it already have accepted with that conclusion, it mean it can be used. Yeah the higher resistence..... it already be accepted so it can be used
So i use that for support my argument. This is not about you not agree or not with that blog. If that is already accepted then it can be used as proof
- 18,393
- 14,323
????? It's damn vaguely manipulated agreed mate. You really still think that your CRT is still valid and accepted after the slander you brought to MG's community.
I am telling you this but no knowledgeable member agreed with this, the matter of fact that admins even admittedly to agree that they only agrees because they should you were creating a blog for better view, not for creating a made up assumptions with 0 evidences.
Stop with this shit, really. You actually made the community really worse than really is.
I am telling you this but no knowledgeable member agreed with this, the matter of fact that admins even admittedly to agree that they only agrees because they should you were creating a blog for better view, not for creating a made up assumptions with 0 evidences.
Stop with this shit, really. You actually made the community really worse than really is.
- 3,693
- 2,061
Bruh as long as the thread is still get accepted then it is valid to use, unless it has downgrade for that, and then what slander i brought?? And even if i brought slander it not have any connection to that thread is valid or not
And what you mean vaguely manipulated, what that i manipulated in that thread?
- 20,083
- 10,871
@Fixxed So you're telling me that you're completely fine with using a blog that had little to no explanation for all of the stuff you claimed in the end just because it was accepted, despite the fact the Admins who did accept it barely knew what was the actual intent of the upgrade. You do realize this is a violation of one of the rules in content revision right? More specifically this.
- The opening post of a content revision thread has to include a clear summary in the opening post what major changes are being made so that everyone involved in the discussion will be on the same page. For example, if an updated profile has been created in a sandbox with a new Power & Abilities section, then you should summarize or bullet point in the opening post the major changes that are being proposed so that people don't overlook them.
- 3,693
- 2,061
First of all i made that explanation page for explain further about deepened. I already write in the conclusion of the blog what ability that the deepened will get
Two, my explanation page is just to explain that deepened mean layered, the major change is deepened=layered, i already say the infinitely layer is come from the scan that say infinitely deepened, it not come from that explanation blog
But because deepened mean layered it clearly mean infinitely layered
Again and again that blog for explain deepened=layered
The infinitely layered is result of there are scan that clearly proof about infinitely deepened
- 31,459
- 34,319
Yeah, I agree with Dread and the others here. Making an Argumentum Ad Verbose argument with no summary and writing it in a way where staff may nod their heads without thinking too doesn't really sit right around here and could potentially make various other upgrades get out of control.
Similar threads
- Locked
