Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

[ImmortalDread]

Okay. So even a mild warning would be an overreaction then?

To clarify, he wasn't being hostile or disrespectful towards anyone. He presented valid opposing arguments without any form of insult or even mild offense. Additionally, there was no warning issued to him by the staff member (@Damage3245) who was present there.

All I'm saying is, there's a General Discussion thread for the series that he could have easily went to in order to address his concerns and for said concerns to have their full merit.
But I suppose he'd just require an instruction to not clog unrelated CRTs with his complaints and go to a different thread for it.

However, these concerns are pertinent to the final result of the content revision.

 

[Eseseso]

To clarify, he wasn't being hostile or disrespectful towards anyone. He presented valid opposing arguments without any form of insult or even mild offense. Additionally, there was no warning issued to him by the staff member (@Damage3245) who was present there.

However, these concerns are pertinent to the final result of the content revision.

He's not being rude at all, just irrelevant.

I just wanted a warning or something so he didn't keep posting irrelevant stuff to CRT's.

 

[DaMonkeMan]

Well okay, I respect your opinion either way Dread*.
Whether or not I'm right, he'll still get a very minor warning/punishment if none at all, which is pretty fair, I just wanted to talk about something you said.

 

[ImmortalDread]

Well okay, I respect your opinion either way.

No issues. As a member who is not acquainted with the verse, I am merely providing a different point of view.

He's not being rude at all, just irrelevant.

I just wanted a warning or something so he didn't keep posting irrelevant stuff to CRT's.

I don't believe he introduced any irrelevant points to the thread. His concerns have an indirect impact on the final outcome of the thread and therefore must be addressed. He has every right to object to the thread based on these reasons.

 

[Marvel_Champion_07]

Reporting this user for vandalising Rapunzel's page without a CRT

Tier 4 Rapunzel tho...

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Seems Antvasima message him before, so is this not the first time he done it? If that's true a block might be in order.

 

[DaMonkeMan]

Seems Antvasima message him before, so is this not the first time he done it? If that's true a block might be in order.

That just looks like a Welcome Message though.

 

[Marvel_Champion_07]

Seems Antvasima message him before, so is this not the first time he done it? If that's true a block might be in order.

Yup, it's not his first time. He vandalised 3 other pages before Rapunzel

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I blocked him for 3 months then.

 

[Theglassman12]

Shouldn't this be a permaban if he's constantly vandalizing pages?

 

[Robo432343]

Shouldn't this be a permaban if he's constantly vandalizing pages?

i dont think he knows the consequences for vandalizing the pages

 

[Antvasima]

Yes, Lepors seems extremely clueless rather than outright malicious, so I think that the 3 months block that Medeus imposed should hopefully be sufficient to make him understand that he has to shape up.

 

[SilentLyfe]

Vandalism from this user.

 

[PrinceofPein]

Undid the edits, also he is new, all his contributions are on that page so I think some instructions are fine

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

Undid the edits, also he is new, all his contributions are on that page so I think some instructions are fine

I agree, a warning should suffice

 

[Antvasima]

I handled it.

Vbroken

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[Dereck03]

So it's not a vandalism as we are used to, but that the first edit of a user is this, already makes me think that it is just a troll.

What we should do?

 

[Deceived3596]

"gets slammed by goku"

That's absolutely a troll edit, send them to the vortex.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Blocked

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

Blocked

Thank you medeus

 

[Deceived3596]

This user vandalized Ada's profile, I've reverted the changes.

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

This user vandalized Ada's profile, I've reverted the changes.

Sounds like a troll but this how old is this account if it’s a new one I think a temporary ban should help make them change their behavoir

I don’t mind permanent ban but I feel like a temp ban could help

 

[Deceived3596]

The account has been active since February and has made similar edits to other Naruto profiles, like Kakashi.

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

The account has been active since February and has made similar edits to other Naruto profiles, like Kakashi.

All right I agree with a full-on ban

 

[ImmortalDread]

Deceived was not even suggesting anything

 

[Qawsedf234]

This user vandalized Ada's profile

From the look of it they just jumped the gun with an edit regarding the newest chapter. That's not vandalism, it's just not following proper procedure. It warrants a warning but certainly nothing close to a ban.

 

[Deceived3596]

I'm fine with a warning, never really called for his ban, just letting y'all know what's happening.

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

From the look of it they just jumped the gun with an edit regarding the newest chapter. That's not vandalism, it's just not following proper procedure. It warrants a warning but certainly nothing close to a ban.

That makes sense, so a warning seems the best

 

[Dereck03]

So guys, a particular case.... This user.. I banned him for referencing **** sites and he also had previous cases of vandalism a few months ago... But the thing is that he has an account here on the forum and is active without a ban....................

So, what do we do in these cases?

 

[DarkGrath]

So guys, a particular case.... This user.. I banned him for referencing **** sites and he also had previous cases of vandalism a few months ago... But the thing is that he has an account here on the forum and is active without a ban....................

So, what do we do in these cases?

If they were banned on the website, why weren't they also banned on the forum?

 

[Dereck03]

No idea, I can only ban on the wiki and most likely we thought it was just a user without an account here.

 

[Dragonite007]

No idea, I can only ban on the wiki and most likely we thought it was just a user without an account here.

Ping him

 

[DarkGrath]

Well, evidently, they were supposed to be banned here.

 

[Dereck03]

Well, that's why I brought the topic up for discussion, i can't ban here.

And also, I don't know if it is allowed but in his About he has a link to a page to donate money to him......

 

[DarkGrath]

Are there any administrators or bureaucrats online or otherwise available currently? I'm unable to ban users as well, though given that he has already been here for a few months by this point, it's not exactly urgent.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Hi, yes, I will ban him.

EDIT: I have done so. @Dereck03 In the future, I would let an admin take care of it so they can be fully banned.

 

[Dereck03]

EDIT: I have done so. @Dereck03 In the future, I would let an admin take care of it so they can be fully banned.

I ban if there are no active administrators to apply the ban or else the user will continue vandalizing pages, and also I reported the case and no administrator checked if he had an account here.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I was late, but the bans applied were legit as were the warnings given by Qawsed to that one user who seemed confused.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

I ban if there are no active administrators to apply the ban or else the user will continue vandalizing pages, and also I reported the case and no administrator checked if he had an account here.

Aye, and that's not a bad thing, but it can lead to confusion in situations like this, so I would still just leave it to an admin unless the situation is extremely dire.

 

[Dereck03]

Sure, I will abstain from banning unless the user is repeatedly vandalizing and there are no active administrators to handle the situation.