- 167,855
- 76,474
- Thread starter
- #25,121
I also think that Arcker123 has only done something worthy of (yet another) warning in this case, and that Colonel_Krukov has not done anything remotely worthy of a HR report.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm fine with a warning for Arcker if that's what's decided onI also think that Arcker123 has only done something worthy of (yet another) warning in this case, and that Colonel_Krukov has not done anything remotely worthy of a HR report.
Can I point out 2 things in my defence cause a year ban is a lil crazy for a mistake on my part.Sorry for the back to back comments.
To add on to the report that @Deceived3596 made just a bit earlier today against @Joshyyy_64
it appears as though the user used a racial slur on site (in their signature)
See here.
I believe the standard for this is a 1 year ban.
I have some doubts about the first one even being a good defense. First of all, the N word has very little to do with Nigeria; it was derived from a different word and I have never heard of anyone actually confirming that to be a normalized term in Nigeria. (And I have actually heard it's actually just a common misconception that some people use as a tactic to hide there otherwise trollist intentions). YuriAkuto tried to say something similar when he said a pseudo N word. Most people would have said they were African American, rather than Nigerian.Can I point out 2 things in my defence cause a year ban is a lil crazy for a mistake on my part.
1. I'm Nigerian but I doubt that matters - wanted to point mention it anyway
2. I was completely and utterly unaware of the rule to do with racial slurs.
Anyone offended by the n-word, my bad fr.
Fair enough, I just reckon that a year ban is over the top for a mistake imo, meant no offence and was unaware of the rules regarding the slurs.I can unfortunately not confirm that you are Nigerian, as your IP addresses are from all over this planet.
Fair enoughI have some doubts about the first one even being a good defense. First of all, the N word has very little to do with Nigeria; it was derived from a different word and I have never heard of anyone actually confirming that to be a normalized term in Nigeria. (And I have actually heard it's actually just a common misconception that some people use as a tactic to hide there otherwise trollist intentions). YuriAkuto tried to say something similar when he said a pseudo N word. Most people would have said they were African American, rather than Nigerian.
Also, not only was that word used, it was also mocking books of the Bible. Based on first few sentences, it sounds like it was quoting Genesis 2:2. Which is another thing prone to red flags; the second point can on rare occasions be an understandable defense for users who are new, but I still find first point combined with what I saw to be weak.
Probably means he has said blood from there, not that he resides in the country. As do I.I can unfortunately not confirm that you are Nigerian, as your IP addresses are from all over this planet.
He's primarily saying "I'm black", not that "it's a term from my home country", as he's ignorant of what allows you to use it onsite (which is nothing), which I drew from his response since he didn't know that it was bad to use on the site in any context.I have some doubts about the first one even being a good defense. First of all, the N word has very little to do with Nigeria; it was derived from a different word and I have never heard of anyone actually confirming that to be a normalized term in Nigeria. (And I have actually heard it's actually just a common misconception that some people use as a tactic to hide there otherwise trollist intentions). YuriAkuto tried to say something similar when he said a pseudo N word. Most people would have said they were African American, rather than Nigerian.
Not that deep. I don't think he intended to mock Genesis, he probably tried to just make a quote that sounded cool (which was definitely stupid and ignorant, unintentional, but ignorant), which is why he didn't even quote the right chapter.Also, not only was that word used, it was also mocking books of the Bible. Based on first few sentences, it sounds like it was quoting Genesis 2:2. Which is another thing prone to red flags; the second point can on rare occasions be an understandable defense for users who are new, but I still find first point combined with what I saw to be weak.
He is. I just confirmed cause i am a NigerianI can unfortunately not confirm that you are Nigerian, as your IP addresses are from all over this planet.
Restrictions have been placed on this verse to write, due to multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of commenting. Was told that permission had to be asked.Wrong place for requests like that. Also, it's a non-staff CRT, simply go ahead and comment.
Next time ask a staff on their message wallRestrictions have been placed on this verse to write, due to multiple accounts created with the sole purpose of commenting. Was told that permission had to be asked.
Done and blocked.anyone undo the edits pls someone vandalized this profile
Yeah, wasn't advocating for a ban; though the "Nigerian" confirmation makes sense then as it's African. I was just a bit skeptical until the specific clarifications. But either way, he's fine as long as he doesn't continue.Probably means he has said blood from there, not that he resides in the country. As do I.
Although that's not a valid excuse. @Joshyyy_64 our rules regarding slurs are extremely intense, even just using them mixed with other words (like you did [I know where they're from so I can vouch for your intentions]) is fine. Doesn't matter the user, using them onsite is a problem
He's primarily saying "I'm black", not that "it's a term from my home country", as he's ignorant of what allows you to use it onsite (which is nothing), which I drew from his response since he didn't know that it was bad to use on the site in any context.
Not that deep. I don't think he intended to mock Genesis, he probably tried to just make a quote that sounded cool (which was definitely stupid and ignorant, unintentional, but ignorant), which is why he didn't even quote the right chapter.
He was probably just trying to make his own verse in this and use it as a signature. I don't think it's wise to now add on "he's trying to defend saying the N word on-site cause he's Nigerian AND he's mocking the bible".
I do understand the rules and our standards, I guess this is something we could add to the censor list and the word blocker, possibly the use of any disallowed word tied to any other word. Although I'm not a fan of the quick insta-ban out of ignorance
@DMUA @Dalesean027 @Deagonxhi, I wanted to know if I could kindly have permission to express my points regarding this thread. I have knowledge about the verse, I think it can help staff members and other people for a more accurate and fair evaluation. If the risk of "prolonged discussion" could be a problem , I will explain what I think in a single message. Tell me if I can act what my "permissions" are. Thanks for the attention.
One post shouldn't hurt but I think me and clover have it covered rn
He do actually on this thread, it's accepted by 2 staff and since it's uncontroversial thread, i believe it's count as accepted
Ok I guess,my bad. i wasn't able to find the thread, nor he posted a link of that thread when editing .He do actually on this thread, it's accepted by 2 staff and since it's uncontroversial thread, i believe it's count as accepted
@Faa_Tzy It is required that you post a link to an accepted CRT in the summary section of a page you are editing.
I would be content with 2 weeks.A 1 day block seems too limited for even a slap on the wrist, if we want all of our members to avoid doing this kind of thing in the future.
Would a 2 weeks block be more appropriate?
@DarkGrath @Mr._Bambu @Abstractions
What do you think?
Thank you for your evaluation.I would be content with 2 weeks.
I could believe they were legitimately ignorant of the rules - after all, online spaces are highly varied with their attitudes on the use of offensive language - and I've made it clear before that I don't like punishing misconduct when there's reason to believe the user has already learned their lesson. Whether for a day or for a year, banning someone who won't cause any further troubles is difficult to justify.
However, as FinePoint put it, conveying the broader message that pleading ignorance is not a catch-all for these kinds of offenses (and that we are entitled to take action even under such a possibility) is important. And I don't believe a day long ban is sufficient to make this message clear. It suggests that such offenses can be met with a punishment that you could effectively sleep through, which is hardly a deterrent. I support the 2 week suggestion.
What is the context for it?Reporting @marosuke for this comment.
Puella Magi Verse High 1-B Upgrade
Is there a possibility that she got bigger and closer because she came from the upper level to the lower level So, if this is actually a QS (which is basically not enough for a QS) she can't get there in the first place. But even if we assume that she is reached, there is no such thing as "the...vsbattles.com
they are just disagreeing with the threadWhat is the context for it?
I simply find this section of the comment, "I don't agree because if I do, I'd have to say her butt penetrated the entire object." rather inappropriate. I didn't find anything in the CRT that can relate to that comment.What is the context for it?
...its just a weird and an inappropriate thing to say because shes only 14-15, talking about thatOkay. It simply seems to say that she has a large butt though. It does not seem particularly offensive.