• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Deagonx said:
Eh, no. We are eager to fly off the handle at it because we don't like Chase. I'm sorry to rain on the parade, but the vast majority of these mistakes have no implications on scaling. For instance:

Chase's TL: Although, I will soon not be able discern how much time has passed in the future, however the fact that BB has already arrived at the Moon Cell is certainly something that can't be denied regardless.
My TL: Although I don't know how far off in the future it'd be, the point is that BB already reached the Moon Cell. That fact is absolutely unchangeable.
Judgment: What did you think that first clause meant??? It's an INCREDIBLY simple one too, how did you get "soon I won't be able to tell how much time will pass in the future"? What does that even mean? Why would Rin need to say that? You must have been tripped up by that "後かの" SO HARD if you seriously thought that was "how much time will have passed in the future" Like, seriously, take a step back and rework on your understanding of parsing grammar rules. Oh, and "動かせない/unchangeable" isn't exactly "can't be denied" but that's way smaller in comparisoon

Yeah, someone tell me what exactly we think Chase's goal was in altering this? I'm very familiar with this whole sequence and the scaling that Rin's statement is used for. None of the mistakes he made have any impact on how that scan is used.
Click to expand...
You’re taking literally one example out of a pool of several scans. Posing this as what’s being used as the strongest evidence of Chase’s translation manipulation is twisting the argument

And again. It doesn’t explain why Chase would ignore advice from somebody who actually speaks Japanese
 
Lonkitt said:
You’re taking literally one example out of a pool of several scans. Posing this as what’s being used as the strongest evidence of Chase’s translation manipulation is twisting the argument
Click to expand...
Well, yes, because trying to go over each mistakes all at once would be needlessly lengthy, I'm just saying that's the impression I walk away with.

Lonkitt said:
And again. It doesn’t explain why Chase would ignore advice from somebody who actually speaks Japanese
Click to expand...
Salt? Pride?

Look I don't really care enough about Chase to try very hard to stop us from perma banning him for this so that we can avoid talking about whether his off-site statements are bannable but like, lets at least be transparent that we are making a mountain out of a molehill explicitly to avoid dealing with an actual mountain.
 
Deagonx said:
Eh, no. We are eager to fly off the handle at it because we don't like Chase. I'm sorry to rain on the parade, but the vast majority of these mistakes have no implications on scaling. For instance:

Chase's TL: Although, I will soon not be able discern how much time has passed in the future, however the fact that BB has already arrived at the Moon Cell is certainly something that can't be denied regardless.
My TL: Although I don't know how far off in the future it'd be, the point is that BB already reached the Moon Cell. That fact is absolutely unchangeable.
Judgment: What did you think that first clause meant??? It's an INCREDIBLY simple one too, how did you get "soon I won't be able to tell how much time will pass in the future"? What does that even mean? Why would Rin need to say that? You must have been tripped up by that "後かの" SO HARD if you seriously thought that was "how much time will have passed in the future" Like, seriously, take a step back and rework on your understanding of parsing grammar rules. Oh, and "動かせない/unchangeable" isn't exactly "can't be denied" but that's way smaller in comparisoon

Yeah, someone tell me what exactly we think Chase's goal was in altering this? I'm very familiar with this whole sequence and the scaling that Rin's statement is used for. None of the mistakes he made have any impact on how that scan is used.
Click to expand...
Bro.

He translated the same piece of text. Thrice in a row. Each time more radically different than the last, the last one cutting out content from the original. Do you really want me to bring Red here to settle this grievous error?

Even ignoring that, what do you exactly have to say about your friend literally admitting he rushed the translations?
 
I addressed it in the staff chat before. Phantom told me in DMs that he indeed has talked to the victim of Dread's grooming, which Dread denied in the first place judging by his side of the story sent by @Dereck03. Phantom told me that Dread knew she was underaged (which Dread denied that he didn't); there might be more to the story but I'm clueless about it. Dread claimed all those allegations were fake, but judging by those screenshots sent by BasedNecoScaler, I think it's safe to assume that Dread's side of the story is unreliable since he lied about such things. Permaban seems like a good precedent, I agree.
 
I also agree with a permaban but I think reports of this kind should be discussed on DM with staff and this specific staff member should bring it to the staff DM.

As much as I wish all the worst for these kind of people, I don’t think everyone should know about this, it’s even worse considering the sensitive themes the report has.
 
M3X_2.0 said:
I also agree with a permaban but I think reports of this kind should be discussed on DM with staff and this specific staff member should bring it to the staff DM.

As much as I wish all the worst for these kind of people, I don’t think everyone should know about this, it’s even worse considering the sensitive themes the report has.
Click to expand...
Dread is not a staff member anymore, this is no longer a HR issue. But i can spoiler tag the images if absolutely needed
 
BasedNecoScaler69 said:
Dread is not a staff member anymore, this is no longer a HR issue. But i can spoiler tag the images if absolutely needed
Click to expand...
IIRC HR still deals with retired members. But this isn’t a matter of being staff or not, the topic is sensitive enough to warrant a discussion in DMs, and you don’t need to expose all of this to everyone.

This is not a rule mind you, I just think this is what should be done.
 
M3X_2.0 said:
IIRC HR still deals with retired members. But this isn’t a matter of being staff or not, the topic is sensitive enough to warrant a discussion in DMs, and you don’t need to expose all of this to everyone.
Click to expand...
HR doesn't deal with retired members but yeah, I agree this topic is quite sensitive and very disturbing and more favorable in staff chat, hence why I didn't report it to the RVRT
 
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara said:
Not that it's needed at this point (I also agree with a permaban fwiw), but Dread has also said a lot of racist shit and is apparently a believer in anti-semitic conspiracy theories. Zero redeeming qualities all around, keep them the hell away from this site.
Click to expand...
Respectfully, could we not turn a very serious allegation into a situation where we throw every possible thing this person may have said at the wall? It's not appropriate, regardless of the validity of your concerns.

I'm not coming to Dread's defense and would hate for it to seem that way, this just should have been handled better and was not.
 
M3X_2.0 said:
I also agree with a permaban but I think reports of this kind should be discussed on DM with staff and this specific staff member should bring it to the staff DM.

As much as I wish all the worst for these kind of people, I don’t think everyone should know about this, it’s even worse considering the sensitive themes the report has.
Click to expand...
I very strongly agree with that these types of topics should consistently be handled via DMs, especially considering that our HR group is already supposed to evaluate the veracity of these claims in private. Let's constantly try to avoid as much community-destabilising panicked knee-jerk reaction inducing drama as possible please.

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
 
Abstractions said:
Respectfully, could we not turn a very serious allegation into a situation where we throw every possible thing this person may have said at the wall? It's not appropriate, regardless of the validity of your concerns.

I'm not coming to Dread's defense and would hate for it to seem that way, this just should have been handled better and was not.
Click to expand...
Very strongly agreed. Thank you. 🙏❤️

Should we delete the controversial post above?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Antvasima
  • Sticky
Wiki Vandalism Reports
31 32 33
Replies
1K
Views
95K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Discussion Rules lil Revision
Replies
39
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Antvasima
  • Sticky
Extremely important announcements for our community
Replies
31
Views
5K
Agnaa
Agnaa
Clarification Of Sentence Phrasings And Addition Of Expected Punishments For Each Type Of Rule Breach For All Rules Pages
Replies
19
Views
2K
GarrixianXD
GarrixianXD
AThe1412
Can you restrict a character's Standard Equipment if it gives them a different tier?
Replies
2
Views
480
TheGreatJedi13
TheGreatJedi13
Back
Top