@Dereck03 @DarkDragonMedeus @DarkGrathAlso, there has been an appeal to be able to participate in an upcoming Tokyo Revengers discussion thread that allegedly concerns an anime adaption of the series which clarifies the nature of a speed feat.
Antvasima
vsbattles.fandom.com
I haven't been heavily invested so neutral. I also do not remember the user in questions reputation.
If he’s ever going to come back after the ban then that’s really going to be worth my concern. But I agree we should let it go for now, or convey this to staff chat if anyone wishes.
Unless this is true, But Deagon said the exact opposite earlier.
Or rather, he said that while they were used, the mistranslations didn't impact the scaling.
this is true
the thread was originally a tier 1 downgrade, with the purpose of removing an 8D statement and a 2-A feat using his translations.
IIRC, the document did state that the Moon Cell stuff was a work in progress.
The mistranslation conspiracy wouldn't impact anything on the case. And the entire reason why Chase was permanently banned is because of his morals and mindset, and not because he directly broke the rules of this community. If you're arguing that he should receive less punishment because he hasn't broken a rule then he shouldn't even be banned in the first place.
That's incorrect. The mistranslation idea was pushed by Crab to find an excuse to ban Chase that didn't involve changing our site rules, since our site rules don't currently involve "bad morals and mindset expressed elsewhere". You can read him literally saying that in posts like these.
However, doing so establishes a precedent of permabans for translation mistakes that haven't yet been demonstrated as malicious, which I think is a bad idea.
The majority of the staff already agreed on his ban before Crab's indication against Chase regarding mistranslations. Perhaps I should've said, "changed the results of this case".
This of course we can all unanimously agree on.
This sounds rather reasonable.
Be that as it may, as per Chase's userban history, the official reason he was banned was a link to Crabwhale's mistranslation post.
As it stands, if we're being 100% honest, the ban doesn't align with the site rules, BUT, we can change that (Something which I am also in favor of). We should be able to decide that we don't want these type of creepy users in our community, and we, frankly, owe that to the rest of our users.
I am intending to make a staff discussion thread on this topic shortly. I have expressed previously on the RVRT in regard to Chase's matter that I believe our off-site rules are flawed, and I have also expressed privately that I was not happy with the way that Chase's matter was resolved. I share many of Agnaa's thoughts, and I intend to compile my arguments for the way our off-site rules should be revised soon.
bumping this
@MorrisHatesYou is the user appealing, he hasn't really done anything terrible asides arguing his concepts of feats to death with staff. The only report I remember of him was on him being a sock which turned out to be false.
Also, there has been an appeal to be able to participate in an upcoming Tokyo Revengers discussion thread that allegedly concerns an anime adaption of the series which clarifies the nature of a speed feat.
Antvasima
@DMUA @Dalesean027
I've personally watched it to see the scene in question a couple of days ago, im fine with them using the on screen movement as the anime shows it but its still kinda got the same problem of our view of izana being blocked blocked by kakucho running towards the screen but considering we see he was already right behind kakucho running right after the first shot was fired its safe to say he was already running after him so just the steps he took to get ahead of kakucho and 90degree arm movement of the push should be fine.
Oh I had no knowledge of any of this, if that's what decided I can't really say otherwise since I've not worked otherwise with TR since the discuss rule.
If this is off topic and people delete worthy then whatever but I would like to add to this by suggesting "just" (Read: just) linking to an RVR post when banning people be prohibited.
Btw, there was another thing they mentioned:Also, there has been an appeal to be able to participate in an upcoming Tokyo Revengers discussion thread that allegedly concerns an anime adaption of the series which clarifies the nature of a speed feat.
Antvasima
To clarify, the username of the person they linked is "Tetsuoforsetti," and the banned user SoloKaneki, has openly admited to using the nickname "Tetsuo." This paired with the fact that both accounts seem to be interested in Tokyo Revengers, is reason for concern imo.
This conclusions seems fine to me. However, I don't believe that significant staff intervention is strictly necessary unless there is some kind of derailment that warrants it.
You do not appear blocked to me and looking at your account block log you have never been blocked.
Did u possibly happen to use vpn?, cuz I had this same problem once
