- 7,887
- 14,932
Let me put it this way, what purpose does it serve to accuse them -- correctly or not -- of not having read the source material?I don't think this sort of thing should be considered a rule violation.
What are we supposed to do if someone actually hasn't read something, and is making claims debunked by the source material?
If the answer is "Do the same thing, but it'll be okay because you're right", then we're just punishing this user for being wrong in our judgement, which seems weird. Is Deagon so knowledgeable about Silver Surfer that he can make that call?
If there's information in the source material that influences the outcome of the discussion, simply post it. Show, don't tell. Prove, don't accuse. No one should be forced to tolerate constant accusations of unfamiliarity with a comic during a discussion.