Agnaa
VS Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Translation Helper
Human Resources
Gold Supporter
- 15,565
- 13,850
Alright, read the latest reports. Here's my thoughts on whether the provided evidence is bad behaviour or not.
Dread's Report
Georredannea15:
StrymULTRA's Report
The_Yellow_Topaz:
I do think that Lephyr's post was phrased in a way that could mislead people, and that Topaz was within her rights to clear that up.
Contrary to what Strym said here, they did continue acting badly after the warning as Topaz demonstrated here.
I don't think that Lephyr should've interpreted Topaz saying "this part of the sentence is deceptive" as "Lephyr is a deceptive person", that's an incredibly unkind reading.
I think Topaz's response of calling that a "futile jab to further clog the thread" isn't great. But I think that Lephyr's move to "you're distorting my words and calling me a liar" is even worse. Topaz didn't do that.
I'm in Bambu's camp of wanting a 1 week ban. There were only a few things that were barely infractions.
Marshadow was topic banned for posting a large number of low quality CRTs. Dread claimed to have warned them, but since no evidence was provided I can't back this up.
About 2 months have passed of the 3 month topic ban. Although initially, a few staff members were suggesting it should only be 1 or 2 months long.
However, this claim about not knowing about the rule was already brought up when the ban was initially discussed. Since no new information is being brought up, I don't think this ban length should be re-evaluated.
Dread's Report
Georredannea15:
- Post 1: Meh, not really.
- Post 2: No.
- Post 3: No.
- Post 1: Kinda.
- Post 2: Kinda.
- Post 1: Meh, not really.
StrymULTRA's Report
The_Yellow_Topaz:
- Post 1: No.
- Post 2: Not really.
- Post 3: Kinda.
- Post 4: No.
- Post 5: No.
- Post 6: No.
- Post 7: No.
- Post 8: Meh, a tiny bit.
- Post 9: No.
- Post 10: Yes.
- Post 11: Kinda.
I do think that Lephyr's post was phrased in a way that could mislead people, and that Topaz was within her rights to clear that up.
Contrary to what Strym said here, they did continue acting badly after the warning as Topaz demonstrated here.
I don't think that Lephyr should've interpreted Topaz saying "this part of the sentence is deceptive" as "Lephyr is a deceptive person", that's an incredibly unkind reading.
I think Topaz's response of calling that a "futile jab to further clog the thread" isn't great. But I think that Lephyr's move to "you're distorting my words and calling me a liar" is even worse. Topaz didn't do that.
I'm in Bambu's camp of wanting a 1 week ban. There were only a few things that were barely infractions.
Marshadow was topic banned for posting a large number of low quality CRTs. Dread claimed to have warned them, but since no evidence was provided I can't back this up.
About 2 months have passed of the 3 month topic ban. Although initially, a few staff members were suggesting it should only be 1 or 2 months long.
However, this claim about not knowing about the rule was already brought up when the ban was initially discussed. Since no new information is being brought up, I don't think this ban length should be re-evaluated.