Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I don't believe dread said anything along those lines, even if she did, she's not staff.Alright, read the latest reports. Here's my thoughts on whether the provided evidence is bad behaviour or not.
Dread's Report
Georredannea15:
Larssx:
- Post 1: Meh, not really.
- Post 2: No.
- Post 3: No.
Quintessence_PE:
- Post 1: Kinda.
- Post 2: Kinda.
I don't think any action is really necessary here.
- Post 1: Meh, not really.
StrymULTRA's Report
The_Yellow_Topaz:
Going from that to behaviour in this RVT itself.
- Post 1: No.
- Post 2: Not really.
- Post 3: Kinda.
- Post 4: No.
- Post 5: No.
- Post 6: No.
- Post 7: No.
- Post 8: Meh, a tiny bit.
- Post 9: No.
- Post 10: Yes.
- Post 11: Kinda.
I do think that Lephyr's post was phrased in a way that could mislead people, and that Topaz was within her rights to clear that up.
Contrary to what Strym said here, they did continue acting badly after the warning as Topaz
Marshadow was topic banned for posting a large number of low quality CRTs. Dread claimed to have warned them, but since no evidence was provided I can't back this up.
About 2 months have passed of the 3 month topic ban. Although initially, a few staff members were suggesting it should only be 1 or 2 months long.
However, this claim about not knowing about the rule was already brought up when the ban was initially discussed. Since no new information is being brought up, I don't think this ban length should be re-evaluated.
Quick correction, it was 11 threads. Some of these were due to being asked to move my low 1-c threads to staff discussion.Your initial claim was that you weren't aware of the rule; whether you were informed by staff or a non-staff member wouldn't matter.
Whether someone is warned first or not depends on the offence.
Toxic behaviour seems inherently more easy to control and more intermittent, if someone gets warned after 2000 messages for 3 toxic ones, that implies that they're not toxic very often. We do sometimes jump straight to banning people for toxic posts, if they're in the first few messages they make.
On the contrary, 13 threads which staff members have described as incoherent and low quality demonstrates a strong pattern of behaviour.
Hopefully this clears up your questions; I see no impropriety in how the report was initially handled, and you have brought up no new evidence. So unless you bring up new evidence, I don't think anything should be done.
No, I don't believe dread said anything along those lines, even if she did, she's not staff.
Your initial claim was that you weren't aware of the rule; whether you were informed by staff or a non-staff member wouldn't matter.
Dread claimed to have warned them, but since no evidence was provided I can't back this up.
I asked a question to clarify and you rrefused to answer,
A few of those threads were pretty much abandoned and were forgotten to be closed, you can check the post history on those.As demonstrated earlier, you had over half a dozen threads open for the verse at the time. So just saying you only had 3 open isn't an adequate defence.
However, Dread's warning did come after you'd created those, and you didn't seem to create any more before the report, so I won't consider Dread's warning as a knock against you; you didn't seem to ignore it.
About this?Thank you for helping out, Agnaa. I think that you seem to make sense.
So should we block Topaz for a week rather than give her a strict warning?
Someone vandalized Neji's profile
As I said, I had permission, but since about 2 months have passed, I forgot from whom I even got permission. However, I was one of the first to get permission and comment.Asking for a thread ban and warning for @Georredannea15 and @Fixxed for continuing to post in this thread despite it being staff only,, and doing so despite being reminded multiple times that they do not have permission to comment.
So can my ban be opened? But that's okay, I don't have anything else to write to that revision anyway.No, the rules only have that restriction for content mods. Thread mods, admins, and bureaucrats can permit people for any number of posts.
Qawsed seems to have a handle on it in the thread. No need to do anything here, imo.
I think a couple is a little too harsh. Maybe just one will do?Likewise, he is ignoring warnings, so a ban for a couple months at least is the best course of action.
Updated it. I think it should work now.The link is dead btw.
A month-long warning block, while allowing the member to still comment on their message wall, seems fine.I think a couple is a little too harsh. Maybe just one will do?
People make harmless jokes all the time like that in threads. Not sure why this is any different, as i havent actually insulted himUpdated it. I think it should work now.
Edit: Nvm, here. Post in thread 'The Computer Gods upgrade (Ichiban Ushiro no Daimaou)' https://vsbattles.com/threads/the-c...ichiban-ushiro-no-daimaou.155804/post-5878095
Yes, that seems far out of line, especially against DontTalk.Updated it. I think it should work now.
Edit: Nvm, here. Post in thread 'The Computer Gods upgrade (Ichiban Ushiro no Daimaou)' https://vsbattles.com/threads/the-c...ichiban-ushiro-no-daimaou.155804/post-5878095
My guy, the first thing you literally do is insult DT. If your first instinct when coming into threads is to make such rude remarks, you shouldn't be a part of the discussion.People make harmless jokes all the time like that in threads. Not sure why this is any different, as i havent actually insulted him
Hell, the term "wank" has similar connotations.My guy, the first thing you literally do is insult DT. If your first instinct when coming into threads is to make such rude remarks, you shouldn't be a part of the discussion.
It's not harmless. It's very gross and definitely insulting.People make harmless jokes all the time like that in threads.
i'm not exactly wrong though
I agree about this. Crude vulgar insults and hostile disrespect should preferably be kept mostly restrained within this community.It's not harmless. It's very gross and definitely insulting.
I expect that kind of banter from my more unhinged close friends. Far as I can tell though, you ain't a close friend of DT's.Hell, the term "wank" has similar connotations.
Im basically saying that DT really likes DKD, nothing more, nothing less