This is textbook doxxing. Scouring someone's internet profiles for PII doesn't stop being doxxing because they are the ones that posted it.
I did it to better differentiate between all the other randoms who were speaking at the interview.
And I didn't believe you. They were listed as part of some "Hero/Heroes Initiative", and since I have no reason to believe you were a part or particularly high-ranking member of any of that, I didn't have any reason to believe you personally conducted them.
No. I said that in response to "instead of removing my full legal name from your post" as if you had asked me to remove that for you. You didn't, which is all I argued there.
I do gotta question about this. Why did you link the interview to yourself? Perhaps I’m missing the context on this.
No one else spoke during the main portions with Scott and even if they did, you could have just wrote "Deagon" since you knew it was me. That is not a reason to publish my name.
You not believing me does not change the fact that you were informed it was my interview multiple times.
Me pointing out that you had doxxed me is a clear and obvious indication that i wasn't comfortable with you publishing my full name on the forums for no reason. You could've corrected it, and instead you acted toxic as usual.
Scott had offered some relevant information about the topic. The video I posted blurred my personal information. Malomtek went on my Vimeo profile and found another video that was unblurred with my name and posted it in bold on his reply. I told him numerous times it was my interview, so he was not ignorant of that fact.
Deagonx is accusing me of "doxing" him because he linked an interview that he claimed was personally conducted by him, especially noting a part that he claims to have personally asked Scott Snyder a question. I didn't believe him about being part of the interview in any particular, and transcribed the question and answer with the questioner as "Rando", with the "Rando's" full name as a supplementary note, the full name being gathered from another interview video. I did not connect this "Rando's" name to Deagonx in any way, because I never believed the "Rando" was the same as Deagonx himself.
You knew it was not a random person. I informed you repeatedly that it was me, and the videos were on my account.
Yet i had no reason to lie, and told you repeatedly it was me. My face and name were blurred in the video I posted, you found them unblurred and published it for no reason, and did not remove them when I told you that you'd doxxed me.
Here’s the initial report. As noted by Antvasima the user in question has a history of ending up in quarrels on the RVR thread.
I did not "know" it was you. I did not even believe it was you. Stop acting as if you know how I think.
The only person who said it was your interview was you. I didn't believe it was "your" interview, and believed that someone else in this "Hero/Heroes Initiative" orchestrated this interview.
I never believed that was actually your full name, as opposed to that of some interview rando. I never connected it to you.
Stop trying to act as if you've read my mind and know the things that I "know". And like I said before, as far as I was concerned you could have gotten the videos from anywhere.
You could have lied about being involved in that interview to make yourself seem more "authoritative" than you really are, but that's ultimately neither here nor there.
I already explained a potential motive for lying, and you don't know me. You don't know how I think. You don't know anything about my beliefs except what I tell you, and what I told you is clear: I didn't think that that guy, or any other person in that interview, was you. The name I put a footnote in for just belonged to some random guy, as far as I'm concerned.
"Hey, this is an interview I did."
And of course, my opinion is that he should be banned. In addition to just being constantly toxic, combative, and difficult, he publicized my full name under the flimsy guise of "not believing it was actually me" even though my name was blurred out of the first video and he had to seek my name on other videos from my account, and did not remove it when I called him out for doxxing me and proceeded to mock me for it.
Thanks a lot, Medeus.
If you wouldn't mind clearing out the comments about the debacle that just happened, I would appreciate it. I'd like to avoid his 2nd doxxing remaining a public spectacle
How about I just delete any comments from the beginning of the conversation?
I cannot speak for Random and Jibz from a personal standpoint. But I was very careful with this report to maintain that all of my comments were either the first comment to debunk a certain point, or looked at a new aspect of the issue at hand. In addition, when I first joined this report, I posted my reasoning for involving myself, and expressed that staff were free to delete any of my comments that were unhelpful, of which I believe only a small handful of mine had to be, mostly as a result of being Ninja’d. I did make comments that did not contribute to this thread, to temporarily explain further to members such as Malomtek. In these instances, I made sure to delete these messages once I knew they had been read by the person they were directed towards. I understand how 3 different members could have clogged up the thread, and again, I cannot speak personally for Random and Jibz, but I think my personal comments made valuable contributions to this thread, failed to derail it, and I deleted any messages that did not fall under this category for the most part. I apologise if I caused any confusion, but I don’t think my behaviour on this report is even remotely deserving of a ban, and honestly I feel even a thread ban is unfair on me too, I feel like I’ve been lumped in with the possible derailment of others just because I wasn’t directly involved with the issue as well, regardless of the validity/worth of my contributions to this report. Of course though decision is staff’s, and if I have without realising caused them grievance in getting through this report by posting unhelpful messages, then I of course apologise
Please don't report me over something I literally apologized for.
All ive done is a rightfully say what Malo did wasn’t doxxing because nobody else pointed it out, and it was a false narrative, and then the next thing i did was tell someone else they shouldnt be conversating inthe rvr.
