-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 280
- 298
What exactly have you been doing to fix these things? I saw you on the recent Black Clover CRT, and to be honest your entire argument revolved around saying “this is wank” without an ounce of evidence, and then you questioned why people just ignored your point.
Last edited:
- 10,775
- 18,705
Kuramamyfav68
vsbattles.fandom.com
kuramamyfav68
He/Him- 432
- 126
Stop using disrespectful terms "dunked on you", that's not even what happened - the thread got locked nigh-immediately. Prove they were "troll threads".
too late.
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,210
There’s this thing called a Content Revision Thread
- 15,709
- 10,745
that is your fault though. Remember next time whenever you want to argue with anyone anywhere to not be a jackass, that will help your cause a lot.
- 32,811
- 38,014
That's what happened tho, nothing disrespectful about this.
That's exactly what ******* happened, just look up the Persona thread that you made using the dumb characterrant link and I can attest that almost every verse supporter there debunked you with the most elaborate of responses.
Literally no one but yourself to blame. You dug this grave for yourself. I'm ending this right here.
- 32,811
- 38,014
Sorry about that, I was typing my comment before he got banned, but seems like I was too late to post before he got the boot.
Anyway, yeah, better safe than sorry. We're better off without him.
- 165,252
- 72,302
- Thread starter
- #13,450
Yes, I handled it. However if our administrators think that a permanent ban was too extreme, please tell me about it here.
- 165,252
- 72,302
- Thread starter
- #13,451
No problem at all.
- 30,126
- 31,461
I am following the thread, but I am unable to comment when at work. And likewise, there are times when the issue appears resolved before I got back.
Anyway, after looking at kuramamyfav68's comments and him basically acting like a Lord Xcano Jr and worshiping that infamous troll group from a controversial subreddit, I agree with his permanent ban. I don't need to discuss it any further beyond that.
Last edited:
- 32,811
- 38,014
BRUH
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,210
AKM’s profile picture is an anime girl at the beach, that post is... not that
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,210
Oh actually looking closer the background is not a beach, huh
well anyways yk what I mean
- 8,536
- 8,943
No no, Ovens is right, AKM has more suggestive pics sometimes.
Setting that aside, that picture isnt really that bad either, like what are we finding too lewd here? Big boobs? Plenty of characters featured in this wiki. Big Thights? Plenty of characters featured in this wiki. Underboob window? Suggestive, but no risque parts are being shown. Picture is fine and we have far more suggestive pictures used in our character profiles.
Setting that aside, that picture isnt really that bad either, like what are we finding too lewd here? Big boobs? Plenty of characters featured in this wiki. Big Thights? Plenty of characters featured in this wiki. Underboob window? Suggestive, but no risque parts are being shown. Picture is fine and we have far more suggestive pictures used in our character profiles.
- 40,673
- 35,222
Eh, still a normal AKM profile pic, just cause it gets you hot and bothered don't make it report worthy
RandomGuy2345
He/Him- 24,110
- 14,607
Yeah, the AKM pfp thing isn't that big of a deal.
I mean, look at my pfp...
I mean, look at my pfp...
- 30,126
- 31,461
It is getting really tiresome how many people constantly report AKM Sama just for having some PG-13 (at worst) level waifus as their profile pic. There is no full frontal nudity nor is their any hardcore fetish wear. Bikini models aren't that bad.
It's not bad enough to be report worthy and just move on.
It's not bad enough to be report worthy and just move on.
Last edited:
- 39,360
- 15,225
Hell folks, i also sometime used a pfp that very lewd and no one basically got offended (at best peoples jusr shocked comically, @RandomGuy2345 approve)
That's all what i want to say
That's all what i want to say
- 32,811
- 38,014
Honestly tho, I'm not the kind of guy that would go out reporting people just because they have suggestive PFPs regardless of whether they are normal members or staff. Everyone is free to have such profile pictures as long as there's no full blown nudity, involvement of underage characters and/or egregious skimpyness to the point where your frontal parts (i.e. nipples, genitalia, hair on those parts, etc.) are borderline visible.
RandomGuy2345
He/Him- 24,110
- 14,607
I'm known for giving comments about people's provocative pfp.
AKM (if he was here) can vouch for me, too. It's not that big of a deal. I have provocative pfp right now.
- 32,811
- 38,014
Is it something exclusive to the PC or is it available on mobile too? I use a PC to explore the forum mostly.
- 40,673
- 35,222
Nah it's just Newindigo's device sucking, I get no lag
- 11,801
- 7,364
90 people talking about what constitutes the average AKM profile picture was immensely necessary.
@First_Witch @DaReaperMan @RandomGuy2345 @Veloxt1r0kore @Newendigo thank you for being crucial to RVR functioning, couldn't have done it withkut your input, especially when an admin already was there to address it.
Please give us staff a morsel to be a fraction as relevant next time.
@First_Witch @DaReaperMan @RandomGuy2345 @Veloxt1r0kore @Newendigo thank you for being crucial to RVR functioning, couldn't have done it withkut your input, especially when an admin already was there to address it.
Please give us staff a morsel to be a fraction as relevant next time.
- 165,252
- 72,302
- Thread starter
- #13,472
Agreed. Even Fandom is not that strict as far as I am aware.
- 165,252
- 72,302
- Thread starter
- #13,473
Also strongly agreed. Let's not be too prudish about regular sexuality.
- 13,458
- 3,773
While this person most likely doesn’t have a forum account here, they keep continuously adding categories for abilities that aren’t on this profile even after I keep removing them from time to time.
Last edited:
- 14,923
- 12,455
Just so that everyone knows, they've been warned multiple times, and even banned, for that behaviour before.
- 30,126
- 31,461
Yeah, this is one of those excessive amounts of seemingly minor issues getting stacked to the point of becoming a major issue. It seems a ban for longer than a month seems justified.
But for how long is the question before I apply?
But for how long is the question before I apply?
Last edited:
- 30,126
- 31,461
Since, no one commented, I suppose 2 months should be fine place holder for someone blocked 1 month for doing the same thing. If an extension is needed, you may either discuss or apply.
RandomGuy2345
He/Him- 24,110
- 14,607
2 months seems fine.
- 7,350
- 13,393
I'd like to report Malomtek.
In the two recent discussion threads that I have participated in with him, namely the Spectre Low 1-C thread and the Animal Man Cosmology thread he has been very toxic for no reason.
However, the greater issue: I posted a video of an interview I did with Scott Snyder a couple years ago and he immediately accused me of lying about the video. Then later, he went through my other videos posted on the account and was able to find my full legal name and doxxed me by posting it in bold on his comment, for no reason. Despite doing this, wrote out the full transcription with my side filled in as "Rando" still accusing me of lying about this.
When I called him out for the doxxing, he said:
A moderator has edited my name out of his comment, but I still see this as being a very serious violation, in addition to his overall toxic behavior.
In the two recent discussion threads that I have participated in with him, namely the Spectre Low 1-C thread and the Animal Man Cosmology thread he has been very toxic for no reason.
However, the greater issue: I posted a video of an interview I did with Scott Snyder a couple years ago and he immediately accused me of lying about the video. Then later, he went through my other videos posted on the account and was able to find my full legal name and doxxed me by posting it in bold on his comment, for no reason. Despite doing this, wrote out the full transcription with my side filled in as "Rando" still accusing me of lying about this.
When I called him out for the doxxing, he said:
A moderator has edited my name out of his comment, but I still see this as being a very serious violation, in addition to his overall toxic behavior.
- 7,350
- 13,393
I also want to point out that I did edit out my name from the main video that I posted that he responded to, clearly demonstrating that I was interested in maintaining anonymity. I did not realize I failed to do so on unrelated video that he found, and I have since deleted it.
Similar threads
