Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,210
I think (key word being think) that their point is that Speedster is allegedly abusing loopholes to circumvent a ban he said he’d learn from
that’s what I think the point is
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
that’s what I think the point is
- 9,176
- 6,585
Yes it does
you literally brought my inbox in here. What do you mean this has nothing to do with me.
Kazuma_kuwabara
She/Her- 4,434
- 2,054
Is an example of what Speedster is doing, I could have choose other, yours was the faster option
- 8,931
- 10,116
I'm not sure if this is report-worthy, but I think it's still a negative thing that should be brought in here.
@Kazuma_kuwabara seems to be really biased when it comes to anything related to @speedster352. He has been trying to be a thorn by his side on this thread a handful of times before, and it doesn't help that he (probably as a joke or jest, considering he said this on a fun & games thread) thinks his greatest accomplishment on the wiki was getting Speedster banned.
@Kazuma_kuwabara seems to be really biased when it comes to anything related to @speedster352. He has been trying to be a thorn by his side on this thread a handful of times before, and it doesn't help that he (probably as a joke or jest, considering he said this on a fun & games thread) thinks his greatest accomplishment on the wiki was getting Speedster banned.
Pikaman
He/Him- 6,525
- 5,210
Apologies if I’m butting in here but considering I was involved heavily enough the last time Speedster was reported, which relates to the above message, I feel like there is probably a grudge, but I do view the criticisms as fair (not necessarily fully agreed with) more often as not.
Instead of talking about personal vendettas or targeting let’s keep it on the track of whether rules were broken.
Instead of talking about personal vendettas or targeting let’s keep it on the track of whether rules were broken.
Kazuma_kuwabara
She/Her- 4,434
- 2,054
"A handful of times" = one time before
As you say, a joke
And I will report/say things about bad conduct from ANYONE that I see is not following the rules, I also reported users that made changes without a CTR or were vandalizing pages
As you say, a joke
And I will report/say things about bad conduct from ANYONE that I see is not following the rules, I also reported users that made changes without a CTR or were vandalizing pages
- 9,176
- 6,585
then you should have used another example instead of involving my inbox.
Speedster is banned because of he probably can not debate properly and his poor attitude to losing. No doubt he deserves to be banned but not wanting him to support characters he loves in other ways that isn’t the reason why he was banned, is totally unfair bro.
- 11,801
- 7,363
Can you fight more on RVR please? It's not like I've said 73848943764 times don't bicker on RVR when the damn report has nothing to do with you, right?
Y'all ******* frustrating as all hell to deal with, Jesus Christ.
Y'all ******* frustrating as all hell to deal with, Jesus Christ.
- 8,479
- 8,871
Delete this message of mine if it is presumptious of me to comment on this, don't know how far my "honorary Staff rights" go.
@Kazuma_kuwabara Speedsters ban only forbids him from directly participating or engaging in versus threads. Arguing them by proxy or at the walls of others, so long he isn't annoying them to the point of offence, is not forbbiden
We have a precedend in which banned members can still bring up arguments via proxy, so long their proxy is okay with doing so. The ban is always to keep out bad conduct, not information that may have benefit.
@Arnoldstone18 Assuming that a offence HAS been commited, you should not obstruct or handwave evidence just because it happend on your wall. In this case it hasn't, but so long you personally have not been called to stand, do not participate in a report without fulfilling the conditions set in the RVR OP.
@Shmooply bring up a more interessting point to look over, because it does seem like overly antagonistic behavior from Kazuma. Please consult with a Staffmember in private first wether or not a a offence worth being reported has been commited.
Now behave
@Kazuma_kuwabara Speedsters ban only forbids him from directly participating or engaging in versus threads. Arguing them by proxy or at the walls of others, so long he isn't annoying them to the point of offence, is not forbbiden
We have a precedend in which banned members can still bring up arguments via proxy, so long their proxy is okay with doing so. The ban is always to keep out bad conduct, not information that may have benefit.
@Arnoldstone18 Assuming that a offence HAS been commited, you should not obstruct or handwave evidence just because it happend on your wall. In this case it hasn't, but so long you personally have not been called to stand, do not participate in a report without fulfilling the conditions set in the RVR OP.
@Shmooply bring up a more interessting point to look over, because it does seem like overly antagonistic behavior from Kazuma. Please consult with a Staffmember in private first wether or not a a offence worth being reported has been commited.
Now behave
Kazuma_kuwabara
She/Her- 4,434
- 2,054
If he can, then I apologize for not knowing it before, I just thought that if you can´t participate in threads, then you should not be able to give your opinion to others to influence them
- 29,889
- 30,897
I agree with First Witch, and I don't have much time or energy to write a lengthy post, but as long as he isn't being blunt and the proxy in question is only seldom sharing details and not letting giving him essentially full debating powers by extension, it's not harmful. And I also agree that this thread should stop getting bombarded.
- 8,479
- 8,871
Just ask a Staffmember first if you are unsure, it's preventable drama.
And this is a general lesson I would like to give everyone here. It's always easier to talk things out first before you jump the gun.
And with Medeus' agreement, this case is dismissed. Moving on
- 164,976
- 71,705
- Thread starter
- #12,854
I blocked them for a year and gave them a standard warning and instruction message in conjunction.
vsbattles.fandom.com
Anos, goat
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 2,228
- 1,424
I reverted the edits.
- 29,889
- 30,897
It looks like he literally went all out and attempted to upgrade all the way up to 1-A. Which is a serious vandalism. Though, Nehz gave him a warning and it was just those two edits. I wonder if a temporary ban is in order.
- 164,976
- 71,705
- Thread starter
- #12,858
Yes, agreed. I applied a 3 months block.
vsbattles.fandom.com
User contributions for Akram kettani | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 12,662
- 9,597
Someone vandalised this page https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Touch_Me?type=revision&diff=7604813&oldid=7601488
The user who did this; Solidorex
The user who did this; Solidorex
- 2,228
- 1,424
- 12,662
- 9,597
- 2,228
- 1,424
- 4,824
- 1,636
I undid Touch Me's edits by Solidorex, also the guy's being kinda rude on the change notes
- 12,662
- 9,597
He is. An admin should block him
- 164,976
- 71,705
- 1,505
- 570
User ArachDusa added abilities to profiles with no CTR
(I'll just link examples of verses I closely follow that change today, but it seems he/she (I don't know) does it constantly and has been told to stop in the past)
Boyfriend: Broadway Force
Girlfriend: Broadway Force
Monster: Broadway Force
Monokuma Units: Varies
(I'll just link examples of verses I closely follow that change today, but it seems he/she (I don't know) does it constantly and has been told to stop in the past)
Boyfriend: Broadway Force
Girlfriend: Broadway Force
Monster: Broadway Force
Monokuma Units: Varies
- 29,889
- 30,897
Left him a warning.
- 164,976
- 71,705
- Thread starter
- #12,868
ArachDusa
She/Her- 107
- 42
I will. But I haven't been told about this in the past, not that I remember anyway.
It's "she", by the way.
- 164,976
- 71,705
- Thread starter
- #12,872
Thank you for helping out.
I blocked them for 6 months and gave them a warning instruction message, as it was an extreme change, but I am not certain if they were just very clueless or not.
vsbattles.fandom.com
I blocked them for 6 months and gave them a warning instruction message, as it was an extreme change, but I am not certain if they were just very clueless or not.
Xelly mafahl
vsbattles.fandom.com
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,211
- 10,535
To clarify before making this report, I have nothing to do with this. I am just passing on information. Do not involve me in whatever drama arises.
Recently @Shmooply shared a screenshot with me of him and @Theglassman12 on Discord, talking about how apparently @Malomtek will frequently DM staff en masse whenever Touhou upgrades get passed, both to complain about it and to try and force downgrades. Based on this comment from Promestein, this has likely been going on since at least November of last year. The fact that he's so obsessed with any and all Touhou upgrades to the extent that he'll straight up harass staff whenever they get passed should at least warrant a Touhou topic ban, especially taking into account the many times he has been reported before.
This is also probably why staff dislike Touhou threads to an extent.
Recently @Shmooply shared a screenshot with me of him and @Theglassman12 on Discord, talking about how apparently @Malomtek will frequently DM staff en masse whenever Touhou upgrades get passed, both to complain about it and to try and force downgrades. Based on this comment from Promestein, this has likely been going on since at least November of last year. The fact that he's so obsessed with any and all Touhou upgrades to the extent that he'll straight up harass staff whenever they get passed should at least warrant a Touhou topic ban, especially taking into account the many times he has been reported before.
- 164,976
- 71,705
- Thread starter
- #12,876
Well, our staff likely dislike Touhou threads because there are so many of them, because they are very time-consuming, and because it is an unpopular and rather obscure verse that few people are interested in, but Malomtek does tend to PM us staff members about Touhou every now and then, including once recently, yes. He isn't being impolite when doing so though.
- 11,801
- 7,363
Asking for input in threads through DMs is perfectly valid and isn't even discouraged, hell I do that, although if you're harassing staff members into inputting that may be problematic.
- 11,801
- 7,363
K, and is it only on wiki DMs?
- 12,662
- 9,597
Yes.
Similar threads
