- 4,059
- 1,713
Ah, my bad.It's in the FC/OC section.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah, my bad.It's in the FC/OC section.
This user has vandalized the Real World main page.
I blocked them.That person did it here too, but I reverted his edits
No need for a legit ban lol, just do a matchmaking one for a month
Okay. I will mention it on his message wall here.Agreed. A ban is going too far. Match ban for a bit should be fine.
Can this person get a warning on his behavior?I'm reporting Nightmare Bloodfallen for his behavior on this thread. He's been repeatedly condescending towards others and intentionally take others out of context just to find more of an excuse to be condescending.
Can one of our administrators investigate please?
That would be better. But you can just take a look at this. It was even before i commented in that thread. All who were following that thread already pointed out he was wrong from the beginning only. I have nothing else to say.Excuse me for commenting here. I need to clear something regarding Theglassman12 accusations.
Null explained how haxes and concepts works in MG. But Thegalssman12 just made his own headcanon and brush it off. He kept on denying the points. Even Null pointed out. Not only him whole thread pointed out Theglassman12 being completely wrong on interpretation on the verse. Still he reported me as condescending. I don't see how me giving a Wincons for Anos is condescending in when his whole Argument are just ignoring the things which wiki accepted. Anos profile even has ability affecting Acausality type 4.
About one more thing he kept on arguing same thing. Corruption affecting concepts. When i even tagged the page for corruption explanation page for wiki.
Anyway i just wanted to say Theglassman12 started being ignorant on every arguments. I know he is a staff i hope i get some netural judgement after seeing the whole thread. Even though i am a normal user in wiki.
Anyway if my argument in thread felt like condescending sorry for that i was only refering to how abilities works. I will leave it up your judgement.
Oh sorry. I don't know how things work in this thread i thought everyone can report seeing others reporting. My bad. Anyway i wasn't reporting him. I was clearing my side.Firstly, this isn't the place for open conversation. Secondly, you don't report staff here, you talk to a member of the human resources group who'll look into it.
Since it wasn't used as an insult, and the member may be dark-skinned themself, would a few weeks or a month-long block be enough?User @KashinKojiiiiii used a racial slur here to express their anger over lack of thread activity.
I gave them a temp ban, but I'm unsure how perma-bans work regarding this so I brought it here.
I would still appreciate if one of our administors would be willing to investigate the issue though.Firstly, this isn't the place for open conversation. Secondly, you don't report staff here, you talk to a member of the human resources group who'll look into it.
A month block as a serious warning to them seems reasonable to me. A perma ban can be considered if this behaviour is repeated.Since it wasn't used as an insult, and the member may be dark-skinned themself, would a few weeks or a month-long block be enough?
I always post content revision threads when I make major and/or subjective changes to profiles, but since content revision threads often take a while to conclude, I don't post any if the changes I want to make don't affect the profile much and/or are concrete. I enjoy spiffying profiles beyond only fixing grammatical errors, which I have done before, and that message from @Sparkive is the first time anyone has been bothered by this. If you analyze what happened in detail, you can figure out that their report is a waste of your time. I'll do clarifications below about what that user listed, though.
-Ability to break the fourth wall to BF & GF,
-Weaknesses in the pages of BF & Monster,
-Monster Intelligence Change,
-Monster optional equipment.
Why is the "I enjoy spiffying profiles beyond only fixing grammatical errors, which I have done before, and that message from @Sparkive is the first time anyone has been bothered by this." part true then? Using the same reasoning as the report from what I see, I should have been told this in many other instances, yet users presumably looked at all other profiles I have spiffied with the feeling of the profiles being correct.Any ability additions should require a CRT. Adding/changing a fair amount of stuff to the profile should definitely require a CRT too.
Shouldn't he have already been given a CRT ban? I mean haven't numerous Staff members and users warned him for repeatedly doing this after explaining what he's doing wrong?Seriously, at this rate I think a CRT ban is in order since he doesn't really bring anything productive to the community. Well, ofc, except for upgrading everything to tier 1b and higher. Like holy crap, he literally tried to upgrade Rapunzel from Disney to 1-B. And ofc, didn't have scans or anything. Imagine that.
Yes we do have a rule - unwritten rule (?) Iirc - regarding this stuff.Apologies if this is distracting from the above posts, but do we have a rule against just linking to threads or debunks on other sites as a CRT? I've seen a number of CRTs do this lately (this one being the latest example), and it seems like they always get closed fairly quickly, so if a rule against them isn't already in place, one should be made IMO.
Soooooo many times.Shouldn't he have already been given a CRT ban? I mean haven't numerous Staff members and users warned him for repeatedly doing this after explaining what he's doing wrong?
Maybe it ought to be a written rule thenYes we do have a rule - unwritten rule (?) Iirc - regarding this stuff.
There doesn't need to be a rule.Maybe it ought to be a written rule then
IMO it's no different from people posting poorly thought out CRTs with minimal effort put into them, which as shown above, are ******* obnoxious to deal with and will usually lead to a thread ban of some kind.There doesn't need to be a rule.
If people are linking someone else's debunks, address them and that's that, and if you don't want to go through the thread just ask them to paraphrase them onto the forum itself. Don't see the issue.
If it's a repeat CRT it can be closed right away citing the issue already addressed.IMO it's no different from people posting poorly thought out CRTs with minimal effort put into them, which as shown above, are ******* obnoxious to deal with and will usually lead to a thread ban of some kind.
You gotta realize as well, discussion isn't about OFFSITE PEOPLE it's about OFFSITE ARGUMENTS, which are completely indistinguishable from on-site arguments if asked to consider on the forum itself, doing otherwise is called gatekeeping, we're gatekeeping entire arguments off the damn site because someone said it elsewhere. That's stupid of us as a Vs. Debating threadYou also gotta keep in mind that offsite people don't necessarily abide by the same standards that we do, so why exactly should their own personal standards take precedence over what this site does?
ye sure, although the thread's kinda toxic so unsure if I should open it.
Was asked to lock it earlier. But unlocked it again.
Can someone tell this guy to stop making extremely low quality CRTs pls? I keep having to tell him and close his extremely poor quality CRTs but he still does it. And every single time, he tries to upgrade a verse to tier 1b or higher over the most random scans/quotes which holds no meaning. Plus a lot of the time he doesn't even bring scans most of the time.
And his arguments couldn't be more lackluster.
He isn't even new, he has been here for like 6 months now and has been making CRTs for good while now. Should know better but ig he doesn't want to learn.
Seriously, at this rate I think a CRT ban is in order since he doesn't really bring anything productive to the community. Well, ofc, except for upgrading everything to tier 1b and higher. Like holy crap, he literally tried to upgrade Rapunzel from Disney to 1-B. And ofc, didn't have scans or anything. Imagine that.
https://vsbattles.com/threads/simon...-this-wiki-above-the-level-of-1-high-c.134755 - this was posted in the versus threads board
https://vsbattles.com/threads/adoll...-characters-are-more-powerful-than-him.134837 - and his newest masterpiece
And so much more.
Given that he seems to most likely be trolling, or possibly nearly completely lack common sense, and as such be unsuitable for this community, I am fine with if we give him a permanent ban from creating or participating in any form of content revision or other important threads, and if he continues we should ban him completely from this forum. He is an extremely time-wasting and anti-constructive member.Shouldn't he have already been given a CRT ban? I mean haven't numerous Staff members and users warned him for repeatedly doing this after explaining what he's doing wrong?