Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I did not mean to be rude. We simply have rules regarding this nowadays, in order to avoid spam and derailment in this thread....I was just giving you a suggestion...
That's fine. You're alright.I did not mean to be rude. We simply have rules regarding this nowadays, in order to avoid spam and derailment in this thread.
I mean if you want to report me for not sending evidence or "making up stuff" which a lot of people do, then at least report them tooI think it's very telling that you constantly make them in serious debates
So it's fine to do it?
People were disregarding your arguments because you were basing a verse-wide cosmology revision off of one instance, that they deemed not to be enough.
Also, you have not addressed the part where you constantly make up stuff in debates and other forms of trolling.
Do you have any suggestions, @Armorchompy ?I suppose that a 1 month ban is going to be applied.
What should we state in the official ban reason text?
Literally nobody says "there is a Low 2-C feat" and then "haha just kidding lol" mateI mean if you want to report me for not sending evidence or "making up stuff" which a lot of people do, then at least report them too
Something like "Rude and unprofessional behavior during debates" I think summarizes thingsDo you have any suggestions, @Armorchompy ?
Because of the recent tier changes of Erza and Luffy, their respective matches had to be removed.Not sure about this but someone has removed vs matches on Iron Man's profile seemingly with no justification.
The profile is unlocked due to a revision.
That being said, @CiscoTheSoto, you still should have provided an explanation within the edit summary. Please make sure you keep this in mind down the line so confusion like this doesn't occur again, okay?Because of the recent tier changes of Erza and Luffy, their respective matches had to be removed.
A little research can solve anything.
Sorry, my bad. I just saw the opportunity to remove outdated matches since Iron Man's page was unlocked, but I'll be sure to add explanations next time.That being said, @CiscoTheSoto, you still should have provided an explanation within the edit summary. Please make sure you keep this in mind down the line so confusion like this doesn't occur again, okay?
Fine, I’ll do my best to try not to lash out like that again. It’s hard considering how busy I am getting recently. But what about the comment tberg made to me? He deserves some warning like that…Given that you reported yourself and do not seem like the type who would seriously mean something like that, and are evidently lashing out due to depression based on your tone, I think that deleting the comment and giving you a warning to make a serious effort to keep yourself under control in the future should probably be enough.
You could at least spell my name right y'know?Fine, I’ll do my best to try not to lash out like that again. It’s hard considering how busy I am getting recently. But what about the comment tberg made to me? He deserves some warning like that…
C'mon dude, don't do yourself dirty like that. We're all human here...
Fine, I’ll do my best to try not to lash out like that again. It’s hard considering how busy I am getting recently. But what about the comment tberg made to me? He deserves some warning like that…
Thank you. This matter seems to have been solved then.You could at least spell my name right y'know?
Anyways I apologize for being rude to you
Could just be an accidental posting of a sandbox. I’ve done that before.This thing just popped up.
I mean...is it really a violation?I remember telling them before to not bump old stuff, seems like they don't wanna listen.
@EficienteIdk if that's the right place but Eficiente closed this thread
The thread wasn't answered properly and the arguments and counters presented by the OP were never properly debunked or replied to.
Just because some people are working on a future CRT that changes standards for some tiers does not give one the right to just close a thread that wasn't replied to properly.
The thread never broke any rules and wasn't chaotic which contradicts one of the reasons for the closure of the thread.
The OP is very hard working and was persistent with the attemps to argue for the upgrade.
I believe that at the very least Eficiente should have given us some kind of notice before straight up closing the thread in one message. There was no need to close the thread either since it wasn't super active and it caused no conflict. I believe closing it that way is rather unprofessional and should either be re-opened or given a proper reason to close it down, one written in an understandable manner.