You do tho Weekly. Outwardly denying things is yet another reason. Its not a friggin attack, and its not what I do cause I literally want to, I cant escape from crossing fate since we share like, 4 verses in common. And yet again, its not about whether people diagree or agree with me, its mainly about how you constantly ignore and purposefully force your own hand within these things, because no one other than you can be right. And its not a problem that you cant, its just a problem when you chicken out because you cant explain something, 'cuz you can'. Again, only the tip of the iceberg,, but dont act as if its completely unjustified, or use it to try and get out of giving actual responses. Domt expect me to respect that.
No, amethyst gems were originally made to serve Pink Diamond, and after she died, their only real purpose was to keep alive a legacy. And defective still does have something to do with weak gems. Again, the quality of their formation is dependent on their resources provided. Again, it means BOth and/or either their mentality and strength. So yes, there are examples of gems being defective due to being weaker, and therefore signified by height. When Pink Diamond is outwardly being implied to be weaker than the other diamonds, we shouldnt jump to the gun to say theyre comparable. Whats the literal problem with waiting?
The diamonds are still strongest arent they? At least what this wiki says, although the newly arisen probability of it all being down to hax. Theres still an implied established hierarchy even amongst the diamonds isnt there? Even if theyre featless and based off other feats, that doesnt mean we can scale PD off that fact. Heck, it turns out we've been scaling them off feats displayed by secondary canon, that have yet to be proved to exist. And defective still can mean being weaker. Thats the basis off Amethyst, Skinny, Carnelion most likely, and I dont know about you, but can you see any other ways PD could be defective, apart from this unknown wanting to flee HW that no one knew about. Its clearly implied she isnt as powerful and that shes rather on the short side, so whats honestly the problem with waiting till we inevitably see more PD power?
No, secondary canon was canon, not originally planned, nor does it tie in to the story, effectiely filler, (which usually isnt considered, but thats for manga and anime things), that is on the edge, and therefore needs EITHER confirmation it happened, like a statement on the show, just as much as it needs contradiction. Even the SU wiki is sketchy on tieing it in with canon, and quite frankly its NOTHING that can be compared at all to Level 1 canon. Theres a problem, with trying to equally intermingle level 1 and 2 canon as youre doing, on the sole fact that its all based off things that arent justified by an original canon. Besides, theres probably many ways that it contradicts the show, not that ive played it, but if that reason ever comes, it will completely shatter the logic here. Im confident I could find something tbh, but as if I have the time to watch a playthrough.
The only feats she has to justify that is in level 2 canon, which is shaky. Especially when fusions most likely had to be nerfed for the game, cause in reality they probably would stomp on anything comparable to base CGs. Plus, Sardonyx one shots a 5 way ruby fusion, Rose needs 3 hits, fairly casual (but sardonyx was casual aswell) to split a 5 way Ruby fusion. Is there anything in level 1 canon, that can justify such a significant statement, which is what we should depend on main canon exlusively.
Well, the show never recalls the significant occurances in AtL, theyre game exclusive, sexondary canon needs as much confirmation as it does contradiction otherwise we can apply any game feat to a show based on the fact it cant be contradicted. (Also Greg playing a guitar can hurt things equal to the gems, off the top of my head). and I believe Rebecca said in an interview that they were made exclusively for the game, suggesting that they dont tie in with the canon, since well, you cant just add in post made up on the spot info even if WoG implies. I could probably find that if I needed to, ask around, but this secondary canon completely justifying top tiers is a shaky problem that isnt being treated as if its like that, as if its completely 100% flawless reasoning. Plus swords that instantly OHKO gems physical forms exist in this verse, and Hessonites sword is fairly similar to Roses, you gotta admit, especially in the fact how it instantly destabilises gems and fusions in a single swipe. Hessonite was also brought to the attention of being a form of Garnet, which led Crewniverse to confirm how fusion gems can exist as singular gems, so if were going by the logic that all gem classes are comparable, she would only be comparable to actual garnet in that case, which I dont believe pesonally, but yet another reason why we cant always compare via gem class.
Roses sword literally negs gems durability aswell, so Rose cant really be justified due to how her army was winning despite outnumbering honestly. Gotta say, its hilarious that most top tier gems seem to be top tier only for the hax and powers they have, like Lapis, Aquamarine, Rose and her sword, and now the diamonds. Starting to think a cleanup project is required, we got physically featless gems being AP compared to hax and powers.
