Well the thing is most calcs are declined because of "calc stacking" (even though the characters in the same chapter were moving FTE) and assumptions made by CGM'S like lowballing the feat and saying this is a distance of 2 cm even though after analysing we found it to be 8 mm
You say shit yet none of them have been debunked yet and we are close to reaching a conclusion on lowering the speeds on some of them
Bro please stop saying that I'VE AEEN THE INPUT KLOL AND THEREFIR GAVE TO THESE CALCS HERE
There input is on a completely different calc WHAT are you talking about
The topic we're discussing is the state if the verse and its calcs in general of course it's a completely different calc that's what an example is
That calc was debunked LONG ago, even before that thread
Calculation stacking is actually a good reason to decline.
It is either get accepted or declined.
You literally defended it in that calc in that thread.....
I know it is but when we tell them that the character in the scene literally moved FTE not even 1 chapter ago/ one minute ago it isn't difficult to realise there wrong
This is still calculation stacking. I will not argue with you any further, in matter of fact, I am not even defending these calculations, but rather deleting the verse based on those.
Well, you also do need to have a solid understanding of the verse but whatever ig
I'd probably review those other threads first if I were you, that's what im doing rn but for this verse I certainly won't have time in spades so if you do do any just post them on my wall
I don't think you can delete the verse without making a MASSIVE crt
No I don't. Scenes are here, the feat happened, I will require some basic formula and done.
Buddy to just look at a feat and calculate it all you need is a one sentence description and link to the feat which is something all blogs have so she'll be fine
Well I mean the only problem is the speed you use that's why
Sure, no issues! I just mentioned you since I trust your expertise and evaluation skills based on these, and will explain the flaws accordingly.
And i think this should be done first before making changes regarding TR.
Honestly no site wide changes are needed just more scrutiny when dealing with the verse. That's why its better to get the opinions of 2 cgms on feats at time because we're literally different people and have different opinions on shit its not so crazy of a big deal in these cases just ask for a second opinion any CGM would respect the others opinion anyways and come up with the best solution no big revisions site wide are needed for this verse honestly
I'm referring to the discussion regarding the use of baseline subsonic speeds, not making site wide revision. I think the consensus of staff members matters more
Yeah and that's still case by case so in calcs like that just seek the opinion of a second CGM or make a thread about the feat in question to solve the issue
Can't we just do that in a blog? If it's in a thread there are always randoms who came into the thread just to ruin things. The recent thread is an example, the discussion went from calc stacking to ******** about TR calcs to ******** about TR suporters to talking about completely unrelated feats to the thread to making fun of things to Ayanokoji vs Mikey to what's more accurate between anime and manga.
They are referring to the fact that actions taken by TR characters are measured using human standards as do most feats. The refusal to do that and insted use standards derived from calcs was what led partly to calc stacking. At least that's what I was able to get from the threads i read. If you didn't need the clarification then excuse me for pointing it out.
