- 16,960
- 4,860
I know this is staff only and my apologies, but I just wanted to quickly point out something.
Also, for those who claim that authors specifically make forums for answering questions, it would be helpful to provide evidence for that when on the subject of the verse it's for. Not saying I dont believe you, but it would always be helpful to prove what the forum's for before applying the answers from it.
For what I bolded out, this would already make it accepted information. Because in the case of your example, the information is greatly detailed, which already makes it different than the vague answering from social media platforms. Not to mention if the verse has next to no new content to dispute it, there's no reason to deny it. Anything that is well explained in detail should already give it the bigger likelyhood of being true.Antoniofer said:I put an example and see if youlre all fine with it: in Anima, since there's hasn't been new content in a long time, its creator used to walk through the official forums (more recently we have interviews in DIscord like 3 times a year), and gave us canon info about the lore and rules. They're mostly clarification, errata's corrections, expanded rules, and info about characters, like backstory and how strong they are compared to other characters.
Also, for those who claim that authors specifically make forums for answering questions, it would be helpful to provide evidence for that when on the subject of the verse it's for. Not saying I dont believe you, but it would always be helpful to prove what the forum's for before applying the answers from it.