Oh, I tried to get this deleted once. Multiple explicit mentions of rape as well, it's a verse where sex acts as the main framing device up until the very end where I've heard it becomes a revenge story. Even so, I don't think we'd allow something like Berserk if That One Scene made up 95% of the entire goddamn series and was all it was known for. I still agree with its deletion.
Agreed, it seems the down and dirty is the main subject of the series, what's good for the MGQ is good for the sex worker and yeah.
Yo, ya might wanna tag DT here
Perhaps because... hear me out... it's not appropriate for this wiki?
@DontTalkDT since you were the one arguing against this profile deletion a year ago, I think calling you should be appropriate.
You repeated the same arguments, nothing new. Like if you want to debate with DT, get something new in the table.
Oh yeah, one more thing, this profile has no scans or references. Even worse, the images in the galleries are not in English, so most people can't verify if they're actually doing what is said in the profile.
Honestly, we had a long debate about, so why do we need to have it again?
It isn't. As said in the past debate, the verse is not **** or anything. It's Level 3 on our content scale as was already made clear in the last debate.
The profile was created before that became a requirement and we have explicitely decided that for all profiles that were made before that time it is in fact not a requirement to have them.
If pornographic materials are not the majority of the story, than what is? Because from the profile, it seems that her "ability" is the main focus of the story.
Articles have been required to have scans in some form before references were made a rule, and yet this page still has none. This page was made in 2020, the rule was implemented before then.
I don't remember this part from my biology class.
By that logic interspecies reviewers is a school biology class "anime". Also no one was talking about sex fights since no one mentioned her using creation pregnancy in a fight.
Redo of healer has a verse page and one character with plenty of thread discussion Haru has the opposite, no thread discussion without atleast year long gaps, no content revision, not even anying thrown into general discussion. I'm just pointing out that haru's page is clearly put on a LOW radar for a reason.
The series features a prostitute, yeah. But if you just take out the sex scenes (which are not erotic in the slightest and far less frequent than you try to make it seem) it would still work as a series. You would still have the parts where she chats with customers, the fights, the chapters about her playing in a sports tournament, the chapters in which she gives relationship advice to her priestess friend, the Christmas party which nobody understands in that world, Haru defying social norms by hanging out in cafes with a group of just women, her inspiring the nice chef of a local restaurant to create dishes that are less fat and greasy to suit women's tastes better. You could still do the scene where she invents a new style of music via her guitar skills of her former world in a slightly different context. You could still have the chapter where she goes out to watch Chiba fight in the colosseum. The chapter where she plays detective to catch a panty thief could come straight from an ecchi anime. You could still have her romance with the demon lord that ends in the confrontation when she fights her way into the castle. You could have the priestess side story chapter. You could have the chapter from Chiba's perspective about how he wanted to save Haru like a hero some day. Or the chapter about the adventurer party. Or the chapter about making Ramen.I don't remember this part from my biology class.
Also, let's not forget that a 3 on the content scale is when the sexual content is not the focus. As in, you could take the sex out and not much would change. But what happens if you take the sex out of this series? Well, it wouldn't ******* exist, because the protagonist's whole power set relies on sex, so that probably suggests it's above something like Fate or The Witcher.
That Haru has any ability is only revealed towards the end of Volume 1. It's only the focus of the profile, because this is a wiki that indexes stats and abilities.
No, they actually didn't. I was a staff member back then, too, you know? They already needed calcs for stats if they were superhuman, but Haru's profile has those by common feats stuff, which was acceptable at the time.
That is not even remotely a realistic comparision.
I have made matches with her. She has never needed a CRT because I created the profile when all content was out. And why would I make a general discussion thread?
Of course this profile is dog shit to lmfao.
[S/]
Yeah, same for Haru. Want me to tell you the contents of every single chapter?
Indeed
Eh, if the abilities were bolded the profile would be fine
Meh, I consider bolding ugly and one really can't argue that it would add to readability in this case. So, since it isn't required and it's my profile...
You clearly don't understand, I'm talking about how she needs sex to have these abilities. Almost nothing in this story would exist without her being a prostitute. There would be no "revenge" plot without her having powers she got from having sex. There would be no chats with "customers" because they're only there because she's a prostitute. The world itself forces her to become a prostitute due to misogyny, or am I missing something here.
I was also on this site back then (not sure if I had an account?), and every profile I saw had scans.
You demon, unbolded profiles just makes it look old.
I am saddened that that's the issue you've found here.
It was not him, it was me, though reading it again i can see that it needs some... better wording and formatting.
When I joined you could make profiles without scans
Gross.
There seems to be a misunderstanding. The existing rule applies only to profiles created after the rule was put into effect. In any other case, the rule explicitly states that there is no requirement to delete the profile or be bound by any obligations related to it.
The absence of references does not result in the deletion of older pages, but this enforcement has an impact on newly created profiles.
Furthermore, this is indeed the case. All that was required was an explanatory addition. The rule itself is relatively recent. If we were to apply this logic to the entire fandom, it would entail the deletion of nearly three-quarters of all pages.
Holy shit I had the dejavu of the century
There seems to be a misunderstanding. I'm not talking mainly about references, I'm talking about scans. They're not the same thing.
Like, grammar stuff or something? I'm open to that.
You miss the part where that has no relevance. What you're doing there is like saying "Oshi no Ko is ****, because if the MC didn't get pregnant as a teenager the story wouldn't happen". That's just not relevant. The question isn't whether some plot device technically hinges on sexuality, but whether the story is all about sex. And it isn't.
Actually, I can. I can also show lots of profiles that have followed those same standards. If you think it was the norm, then you haven't been looking into obscure verses enough.
Are you sure about that, cause you can't really call the sex portions a outlier you can just strip out since her main power pregnancy creation requires *********** and has a scene where's she's pretty adamant to make a guy finish.
