Don't be an asshole, don't get warnings, simple as. Behave if you want to engage in discussion.
Honestly, if it's more about the verses themselves, it should be a note on the profile IMO.
Here it starts and the following page. And by pretty much the same people, now that I look at it.
Yeah, also ain't that technically against the rules to post a link leading to that?
I suppose. I removed the corresponding 2 scans from the gallery now and give myself a warning. (For the protocol I will say clearly that everyone was aware what they were clicking on)
...True that.
I won't have the big debate on whether prostitution is consensual. But to be clear, the "rape scan" is out of context. It is talking about her doing her job like usual, but with roleplay.
Fair enough, even though I have to glide across eggshells to get rid of those links that weren't hard to find on Google. I'll comply.
The work is also well known for people that have not actually read the work having strong opinions on it. And I mean that seriously. So much debate on it online from people that haven't read it.
As far as I could find not just in Japan, but advertised as such on English and German websites, too.
Just to be clear (even if it's not important): It doesn't even do that. The story actually tries to have a feministic message (the author says he tried to write a story that appeals to women, as strange as that sounds). Debatable if it succeeds in that message, but it is definitely not in favour of that stuff.
Even though this is wrong, there is absolutely 0 reason for me to continue this argument not to mention it's going in circles and you clearly won't agree or be convinced, so I'll drop this.
It is, however, something to keep in mind. We don't want to exactly be hypocritical with what we allow in the wiki. If people don't want this series in the wiki, that's alright, but they would have to change our standards as a whole first.
It's still weird that haru just causally has a power that came from sex, but if I was the first guy to advocate for a interspecies reviewers profile and I say the sex wasn't massively prevalent to the story or scailing and got it approved through logic then yeah I'll eat my past words on haru.
They read it for the "plot"
Where in the hell is DT abusing his power IF he literally rejected the discussion rule idea?
Not sure you quite understand what he meant but it's not worth getting worked up over and the discussion is basically over anyway, let's just move on.
You are so goofy lmao.
Basically an Isekai about a prostitute and rape though the discussion ended
I prefer to hear from someone who has genuinely read the entire series, as others are engaging in debates without even having read it.
Its still the main starting thing we agreed upon Dread it is what the character is. Stop acting smart
scans are very much required???
I mean Oven asked what we were debating about and we are debating about a Isekai with a prostitute mc
Demii, please understand that there are no strict rules in place regarding the enforcement of scans. The inclusion of scans is simply a preferred method of referencing, but it is not a mandatory requirement or regulation.
I don't think the rules should say that scans are optional, and that specific section of the rules should be reworked. There are instances of characters not having specific abilities or feats (and it has happened before), but goes under the radar because it not being mandatory.
Which is why References are a thing now AND mandatory
Then it should be changed, there was an entire ass thread months and months ago telling everyone "References are mandatory now" in no uncertain terms
