• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
There was a thread on this where we deleted all the other composite files, you can probably find it by looking through Composite Human as a topic.
 
Composite Human is flooded with threads, so I can´t really find it without diving into the deep web.
 
Saikou The Lewd King said:
The problem is that they go against our current rules, which only allows profiles for non-canon versions of a character if they're notable and different enough. Which isn't really the case for these two here (their popularity in VS Debates not mattering).
Allowing them would allow any crossover versions of a character (like Smash) to have profiles, which wouldn't work.
Even by that logic, the DLC did decently well enough and they're pretty notable, both being iconic characters in a video game that sold pretty well.
 
I honestly don't see why an exception should have been made for an OC such as Composite Human just because he's popular, but whatever, he's just an exception, so it might not be a good idea to use him as an example.
 
This is nowhere near notable enough. Simply being in a DLC that did "decently well" and being from popular games. Most characters from Smash are infinitely more notable than this crossover, yet they don't get any profiles either. It doesn't change the fact that these versions of the characters are literally the same but stronger due to being scaled to Asura.
 
No, exceptions can exist. You can also read the entire thread, as there's more argument than just that.
 
Why is this even brought up? Neither of those profiles are remotely as popular as CH or any of the Composite profiles. It doesn't matter.
 
Honestly, I really think making an exception to CH just because he is a popular concept is kind of a double standard, but my opinion doesn't really matter anyway, so, there's that.
 
In the history it shows that there was some stuff (Still incomplete),

They likely tried to deleter it themselfs or something.
 
Yes, it seems to have been a mistake.

I have deleted the page.
 
Abyss (Marvel vs Capcom 2)

  • Tier justification: Someone saying the same as the profile says in a Fun & Games thread+some headcanon in a wiki
  • Speed: Scales to the real counterpart of characters as opposed to feats in the verse
  • His verse would be Marvel vs Capcom, no need to specify what game
  • Requires keys to mention how he's always more powerful than before
 
Okay. So should I delete the page?
 
Antoniofer created the new Anima:Beyond Fantasy pages, including Infinite Orb. He has problems wih the English grammar, and I haven't had the time to clean up all of their language.

Nevertheless, he is a helpful staff member, so I do not want to delete them. Feel free to help with cleaning them up instead.
 
I, well, tried to fix what I could.

There are still many issues, and I'm not sure what many of the abilities mean.
 
Dargoo Faust said:
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/DARPA_(InFAMOUS)

It's an organization; but it's structured like it's a singular character.

At best it should be a civ (Even then that's a massive stretch), but it should be deleted until someone knowledgeable on the verse decides to do it right.
The page for the Space Marines and Assasinorium aren't set up as civs either. We're a bit inconsistent in this regard.
 
I don't think that we have a standard structure page for organisations.

I will ask Matthew if he is interested in handling it, as I think that he wrote the civilisations page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top