Profile Deletion Requests Thread - 5

[Antvasima]

It is a borderline case, but does not seem very relevant to keep around.

 

[Agnaa]

Casper_the_Friendly_Ghost_(Composite)

Aside from the minor formatting issues can be fixed relatively easily, does this character deserve a composite profile?

 

[Dargoo_Faust]

Casper_the_Friendly_Ghost_(Composite)Aside from the minor formatting issues can be fixed relatively easily, does this character deserve a composite profile?

Regardless of whether he deserves a composite, there should be much more evidence/better justifications used.

I also happen to think he shouldn't need a composite profile, although if he would need one that one isn't up to our standards.

 

[Antvasima]

I don't think that the Casper profile seems particularly bad.

 

[Agnaa]

I don't think that the Casper profile seems particularly bad.

I don't think it's so much about the quality (even though Dargoo seems to agree), but more that I thought we had pretty strong requirements on what's needed for a character to have a composite profile.

Does Casper meet those requirements?

 

[Antvasima]

I do not know. If he has no coherent "main" canon, it should probably be fine.

 

[Bobsican]

Well, as the Casper wiki says, Casper doesn´t really have a set canon, so he can stay here.

 

[Skylietz]

Nitta Yoshifumi (Hinamatsuri)

Despite his role in the Hinamatsuri verse as one of the main protagonist, he lacks of feats so far, never directly engaged in combat, and just a bit smarter than average human (a high-ranked yakuza member). It does not seem relevant to keep the page around.

 

[Antvasima]

Well, it can probably stay as long as it isn't unreliable. It does not seem to cause any harm.

 

[Bobsican]

I took most of the feats directly from the wiki itself, so I can´t think of a way to properly reference them.

Leaving that at a side, it´s accurate.

 

[Bobsican]

By the way, can I make a profile for Yogi Bear?

 

[Antvasima]

Yogi Bear should probably be fine, as long as you have reliable feats to scale from.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Power_Modification

Ummm... This again but with a slightly different name

 

[Antvasima]

I think that Reppuzan allowed the page to be created, and would try to improve on it.

 

[RKGenki]

Fire discussed it with SD

 

[Kyleb79]

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/SCP-001-J since i'm the owner of the page since it was a failure to me and it's a weapon not a character

 

[Bobsican]

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/SCP-001-J since i'm the owner of the page

You have to also say why, thanks you.

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

001-J should really just be a weapon profile.

 

[Kyleb79]

It's still a failed page and it's protected now

 

[WeeklyBattles]

J-Series SCPs are quite literally joke articles

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

They're non canon but non canon profiles are allowed as long as we don't scale canon characters to them. Mawgu, Minecraft Story mode, etc.

 

[Bobsican]

J-Series SCPs are quite literally joke articles

Even 420-J?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Yes

 

[Torlikoff]

Apparently there's a tale saying they're canon.

 

[Agnaa]

They're non canon but non canon profiles are allowed as long as we don't scale canon characters to them. Mawgu, Minecraft Story mode, etc.

They are canon. This tale from resurrection hub explains them as being canon, but not under the control of the foundation. They're created by and contained by insane/delusional reality warpers.

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Make a page for the reality warpers that made them.

 

[Agnaa]

Make a page for the reality warpers that made them.

A single one of them made 419-J, 1333-J, 2000-J, 2558-J-EX, 4357-J, 5040-J, 5308-J-5, 7560-J, and possibly others.

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

SCP is so meta that even the stupid jokes have an in-universe explanation, omg.

Seriously tho, I think 001-J should be a weapon profile; it's literally a button.

 

[Antvasima]

So should we delete the page or not?

 

[Agnaa]

In my opinion, no, it should just be retooled into a weapon profile.

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

The page itself isn't really that bad, it's just that this isn't a character, it's an object, it should be a weapon profile.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Is anybody willing to handle it?

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

Ryu (Asura's Wrath) and Akuma (Asura's Wrath) should definitively go. I brought it up a few times, but these versions are pretty much exactly the same characters as the original, except stronger and faster. There are no reasons for them to exist outside of wanting to have Tier 4 Ryu.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. I suppose that you can probably delete them then. Just remember to first check the "what links here" option, so you update the pages that link to them.

 

[Cropfist]

Those pages are rather popular, there should be a greater discussion before deleting them.

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

Hence why I waited a bit. I would rather get more input on this before deleting them.

 

[fandom_22Easy]

I don't see the problem. This is a character indexing site anyway so having the crossover forms of said characters does no harm to anyone. They're decently popular and used anyway so I see no reason they should go

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

The problem is that they go against our current rules, which only allows profiles for non-canon versions of a character if they're notable and different enough. Which isn't really the case for these two here (their popularity in VS Debates not mattering).

Allowing them would allow any crossover versions of a character (like Smash) to have profiles, which wouldn't work.

 

[Bobsican]

The problem is that they go against our current rules, which only allows profiles for non-canon versions of a character if they're notable and different enough. Which isn't really the case for these two here (their popularity in VS Debates not mattering).

Then why this is still here? I thought that the reason it wasn´t taken was just because of popularity.

 

[Wokistan]

CH is a common concept with this sort of thing, and in general is the exception and not the rule.