- 2,741
- 489
Many of these will still be an alternate version of Mewtwo. Also, the Mewtwo owned by Rainbow Rocket Giovanni has been vigorously trained for years by the evil tyrant.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
- 2,565
- 2,209
so should anime mewtwo, since it's base form is considered the strongest pokemon (only one shown to mega evolve is the one from the black and white movie)
- 2,741
- 489
Rainbow Rocket Giovanni needs his own profile. I’m sick of him being tacked onto the main Giovanni page.
- 2,741
- 489
Moderators, agree with this CRT at once!
ShockingPsychic
He/Him- 3,318
- 1,276
- 2,741
- 489
They’d scale from the main series but not be canon to it.
- 2,741
- 489
ump
Lou_change
He/Him- 10,122
- 5,386
Because unique abilities
- 16,959
- 4,855
That shouldn’t really matter. Conquest should absolutely be canon and be in the multiverse, since not only does it acknowledge the existence of the main games (Aka, trainers catching Pokémon with poke balls in other faraway regions), but Arceus is also still considered the god who created everything in Conquest, meaning the Conquest world is something created by Arceus directly, so it’s apart of the main canon, follows the source material, lore and everything else.
Last edited:
- 10,064
- 5,290
Are there any major points of contention that need to be addressed before I give my seal of approval?
I have previously expressed my displeasure of the canon split previously proposed and pushed through, and have agreed with the points made in the doc itself, but after six pages of discussion that I have not read up until this point, I don't know if there's anything that needs addressing before I can give my own thumbs-up.
I have previously expressed my displeasure of the canon split previously proposed and pushed through, and have agreed with the points made in the doc itself, but after six pages of discussion that I have not read up until this point, I don't know if there's anything that needs addressing before I can give my own thumbs-up.
- 17,212
- 12,650
Not really imo
- 10,064
- 5,290
Then support is what I will give for this one.
This madness has gone on long enough.
This madness has gone on long enough.
- 16,959
- 4,855
There’s probably not much else to say that hasn’t been already said, but since I’ve been busy and tend to procrastinate to an extent, I feel that I should mention this point regarding the scaling for legendaries in particular
One of, if not, the main reason for legendaries having been scaled the way they were prior to the split is because the vast majority of them either don’t have anti feats to conflict with the tiers they got, or they don’t have suggested limits from the feats they have displayed in order to argue against scaling.
In other words, their existing feats are either casual (Ex: The Life Trio or Light Trio) or they have no anti feats to go against receiving scaling. Especially since many legendaries tiers are based more on scaling in the first place.
So unless we go with the species pages suggestion that was brought up earlier, I don’t see the issue with bringing back how legendaries were scaled before, with minor alterations if anything.
One of, if not, the main reason for legendaries having been scaled the way they were prior to the split is because the vast majority of them either don’t have anti feats to conflict with the tiers they got, or they don’t have suggested limits from the feats they have displayed in order to argue against scaling.
In other words, their existing feats are either casual (Ex: The Life Trio or Light Trio) or they have no anti feats to go against receiving scaling. Especially since many legendaries tiers are based more on scaling in the first place.
So unless we go with the species pages suggestion that was brought up earlier, I don’t see the issue with bringing back how legendaries were scaled before, with minor alterations if anything.
- 2,741
- 489
So… is that it? Do we have the normal scaling back?
- 17,212
- 12,650
Idk if we should wait for more input but if this does goes through then yes, we'd just have to tweak some scaling and probably upgrade normal mons after
- 2,741
- 489
And reopen my Pokemon Physiology page thread! squeal
- 2,741
- 489
Is there anything else we need to do before it’s my turn to revitalize Pokemon debating as we know it?
- 16,959
- 4,855
Bump
Bobsican
He/Him- 21,625
- 6,271
- Thread starter
- #222
Agree: @Starter_Pack, @SamanPatou (except for legendaries if the feats only happen in one piece of media), @Planck69
Disagree: @Everything12
It seems we probably should polish things with Everything12 and SamanPatou first from what I'm looking.
Disagree: @Everything12
It seems we probably should polish things with Everything12 and SamanPatou first from what I'm looking.
- 10,093
- 3,769
Okay. Someone wanna inform them that their input specifically (Not that of another stafff, theirs.) is needed for this to make progress so that we can clear up the queue of CRTs for this verse, please?
We should review their stances & see what we can do, & see if those stances shouldn't be taken in place of those of other knowledgeable members.
- 17,212
- 12,650
- 2,741
- 489
Uhhh you don’t have to do that
- 13,119
- 20,830
I know you want to do your own thread really badly but yes this is important to do, let's not force a conclusion yeah?
- 2,741
- 489
Alright, fine, I get it. I do have a smaller CRT that is unaffected by this one that could still use some eyes on it, though.
- 17,212
- 12,650
Admittedly this IS why voting exists. Idk about Saman but Everything never really came back to elaborate, he just disagreed simply there and then. Sometimes disagreements are hard to switch to agreements in which case we should work with what we have.
- 15,126
- 6,901
I'll make sure that'll never happen./j
- 2,741
- 489
Bump, again
- 10,093
- 3,769
Apparently, we should polish things over with you guys, given you're Staff & don't (completely) agree. Therefore, your input is again needed.
According to this, anyway:
(Hopefully quoting their posts alerts them.)
- 61
- 10
eh I don't agree necrozma anime only achieves star level feats in its ultra form in manga and game I suppose they scale but anime No
- 16,959
- 4,855
Why would it only be ultra form?
- 61
- 10
Why is his ultra form the one that has star level feats, not the base one, because base necrozma anime would scale to ultra necrozma?
- 16,959
- 4,855
He would just upscale from the light duo then. Plus Base Necrozma still has the feat of reabsorbing Ultra Space’s light.
- 61
- 10
light from Ultra Space. that's from the game in the anime it doesn't have that feat
- 16,959
- 4,855
You’re missing the point of the thread, then. Undoing the split means Necrozmas feat can go for its other versions, so long as theirs no anti feats to oppose that.
Not having the feat isn’t a contradiction.
Similar threads
