- 19,217
- 16,831
- Thread starter
- #41
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
One Piece: Can We Get Much Faster - God Tier Speed Upgrade
- Thread starter Kachon123
- Start date
-
- Tags
- one piece (verse)
- Status
- 2,042
- 1,788
Sequence of events that show no proof Sanji moved 180 degrees in the timeframe of queens lasers travelling 50cm.
Nope. But if you weren't being a liar you would realise It isn't 50cm.
- 13,115
- 20,830
Now you're just stonewalling. Given the sequence of events (such as Sanji having made the full rotation by the time the laser made contact with the ground), it's evident that he did
So you don't have evidence and are resorting to petty accusations, got it
- 111
- 35
exactly good job, that's what a negative claim is, I don't need justification as the burden of proof isn't on me as im stating non existence of something the burden of proof is on the positive claim. What youre doing is burden shifting.
- 13,115
- 20,830
That's... completely misusing all of those terms. Even a negative claim requires substantiation beyond just "no," otherwise no one's gonna take it seriously
- 15,333
- 22,141
This seems fine.
- 42,593
- 36,885
Yes
- 111
- 35
it doesn't as I don't have the burden of proof, that's on the positive claim and if u wanted to you could've explained how it was incredulity but you didn't so what competent person would take you serious?
- 2,042
- 1,788
Panel height = 417px
Queen's nose = 0.34971428571429 (102px)
angsizing: 0.34971428571429 * 417/[102*2*tan(70deg/2)] = 1 meter. Clear contradiction to your pixel scaling.
Queen's nose = 0.34971428571429 (102px)
angsizing: 0.34971428571429 * 417/[102*2*tan(70deg/2)] = 1 meter. Clear contradiction to your pixel scaling.
- 19,217
- 16,831
- Thread starter
- #52
A panel showing both Queen and Sanji should definitely be used over a panel that just shows Queen which's purpose is to show Queen shooting the laser.
- 13,115
- 20,830
Like, at least 5 people on this thread alone
Anyways, the calcs make it abundantly clear what the distance is. Queen is also leaning his head over so despite Sanji being further from the body, that has no bearing on how far he is from Queen's head.
- 2,042
- 1,788
The most recent panel should be used. Simple as that. Even so, its a contradiction to your pixel scaling.
- 111
- 35
none of them are competent for one and my comment was on if what vzear said was incredulity or not, and its not
- 13,115
- 20,830
I'd say quite the opposite, given they've actually argued while you've just said "no" and that's it.
Please make proper arguments instead of just going "nuh uh." I'm just gonna ignore you if you don't
- 18,549
- 18,599
I would say multiple staff members and a calc group member are competent enough to judge a calculation's merit. Certainly more so than a member who has no business questioning their ability to do so to begin with.
- 42,593
- 36,885
"Theyre not competent!" Cried the sub-100 posts blue name who thinks that screaming no is an actual argument.
- 42,593
- 36,885
Almost ever single one of your over 1000 posts has been cringe sooooo
- 13,115
- 20,830
In the event of a contradiction, it then comes down to which is more reliable. Kachon has given an argument for why his is more reliable to use here
- 18,549
- 18,599
@Vzearr
I have no clue what gives you the idea that being needlessly antagonistic on a thread that's long since been accepted will change that but I'll advise you here and now you're better off making a proper argument for your stance.
@DaReaperMan
Don't encourage him.
I have no clue what gives you the idea that being needlessly antagonistic on a thread that's long since been accepted will change that but I'll advise you here and now you're better off making a proper argument for your stance.
@DaReaperMan
Don't encourage him.
- 2,042
- 1,788
Stalker.
Explain why it would be better to use a panel that happens 2 panels before the feat over a panel that happens one panel before the feat. Lets not forget the fact that 50cm is clear bullshit.
"Sanji and Queen were both in the panel" isn't a good argument.
- 2,042
- 1,788
Because its contradicted by a panel after the fact.
- 13,115
- 20,830
Claiming something's not a good argument simply because you said so is not how I'd go about this, but sure. Fundamentally, nothing really changes between the two panels as far as event sequence goes, so I'd rather go with the one that shows both characters to properly gauge a distance between them.
Also, "clear bullshit"? Don't argue from your feelings.
I could also say your 1 meter result is "clear bullshit" because it's contradicted by the Sanji and Queen panel.
- 32,835
- 38,104
You mean the panel that is not at all fit to be used because it doesn't give us a clear picture of the two beings involved, which is necessary for the trajectory of the lasers to be accurately mapped for this calc to work?
- 18,549
- 18,599
You have two panels. One of which has a single character performing an action against another who isn't on-page, and another with both characters being present at the same time, from which a clearer comparison and visualization can be made.
Two calculation group members and 3 evaluating staff looked at both scenarios and decided the one with a proper measurable distance between two characters is preferable for use.
This isn't rocket science. This is a basic choice of what's accepted as a more accurate feat by people that, being honest, hold far more credibility than a new member who floundered that he couldn't downgrade a series for the sake of it when debunked on that fact.
There's no agenda here. The thread just passed.
Two calculation group members and 3 evaluating staff looked at both scenarios and decided the one with a proper measurable distance between two characters is preferable for use.
This isn't rocket science. This is a basic choice of what's accepted as a more accurate feat by people that, being honest, hold far more credibility than a new member who floundered that he couldn't downgrade a series for the sake of it when debunked on that fact.
There's no agenda here. The thread just passed.
- 111
- 35
the irony coming from you shifting the burden when all you had to do was explain how it was incredulity
- 32,835
- 38,104
I'd suggest you no longer comment on this thread if you have nothing useful to say anymore.
- 111
- 35
yet if you knew logic you would know that a single negative claim has nothing to do with an argument
- 111
- 35
say that to clover not me
- 111
- 35
I never questioned the calc why are you responding to me
- 111
- 35
ive never claimed the existence of anything
- 111
- 35
youre the one who said it was incredulity when its not
- 13,115
- 20,830
No he's saying it to the right person. There's no confusion
- 946
- 424
There seems to be a discussion on the distance between Queen and Sanji in this thread. What if I say that we should ask Damage3245's opinion, since he agrees that a distance of half a meter between Queen and Sanji doesn't make sense?
- Status
