Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
probably >>65.12 KilotonsIn terms of the actual fight, what does Iaian scale to?
skill feats are on par with jaune's? scans or like... any tangible proof?his skill feats are on par with Jaune's
I've actually heard Broadswords in general are better in combat IIRC. Though from what I've also heard, Katana's are easier to use due to being smaller.Katana vs Broadsword, Katana wins most of the time.
Katana vs Broadsword and shield, Shield wins.
Gotta get that cleared up.
Yesskill feats are on par with jaune's? scans or like... any tangible proof?
Weren't a large majority of the things here debunked in the last RWBY thread?Yes
[snip]
This is where this key of Jaune sits in terms of skill
Katanas are generally more durable, sharper, and overall more well-made.I've actually heard Broadswords in general are better in combat IIRC. Though from what I've also heard, Katana's are easier to use due to being smaller.
I've actually heard the opposite. Broad swords due to being larger are more durable, longer (and range is actually op when it comes to weapons historically. Look into spears/polearms vs swords, 90% of the time spears/polearms win just because of range alone), better for parrying.Katanas are generally more durable, sharper, and overall more well-made.
Not that I'm aware of no, that would require a verse-wide CRT as that is the currently accepted general skill scaling for the verse.Weren't a large majority of the things here debunked in the last RWBY thread?
Katanas are actually pretty poor weapons, especially historically speaking. Most Samurai did not use Katanas in warfare, even before the age of guns. Katanas were a sidearm at best and a status symbol + self defense weapon during peace at worst.Katanas are generally more durable, sharper, and overall more well-made.
And I've seen tests where Broadswords shattered due to stress that a Katana no-sold, it's about if you properly make the Katana or not.I've actually heard the opposite. Broad swords due to being larger are more durable, longer (and range is actually op when it comes to weapons historically. Look into spears/polearms vs swords, 90% of the time spears/polearms win just because of range alone), better for parrying.
Can't speak for the more well made. But I've seen durability tests on the swords before. The same tests that ****** up the katana only left minor damage on the broadsword due to being bulkier.
Indeed, cause the Samurai had this thing called "armor" made to deal with such attacks. Swords vs armor, armor wins every time unless it is actually awful. In terms of killing an unarmored target, Katanas we're built to be durable two-handed killing machines, while Broadswords were built to be able to not completely suck against armor.Katanas are actually pretty poor weapons, especially historically speaking. Most Samurai did not use Katanas in warfare, even before the age of guns. Katanas were a sidearm at best and a status symbol + self defense weapon during peace at worst.
A European sword offers way more in terms of combat techniques thanks to the double edge and hand guard. The difference isnt huge though and most fencing and Kenjutsu schools have a technique overlapp of like, 80% thanks to Japanese and European anatomy and thus biomechanical limitations being, you know, the same lmao.
Glorious Nippon steel folded 10^16 timesAnd I've seen tests where Broadswords shattered due to stress that a Katana no-sold, it's about if you properly make the Katana or not.
Basically, Japanese weaponsmiths were something else manGlorious Nippon steel folded 10^16 times
I'll have to look into that. I haven't run into a test yet where the broadsword broke before the katana. If it's simply a case of it being "properly" made, then I'd just say the same applies to broadsword given generic mediocre broadswords handle damage better than generic mediocre katana's.And I've seen tests where Broadswords shattered due to stress that a Katana no-sold, it's about if you properly make the Katana or not.
...So did the Europeans. Far better armor in fact. The Sword still saw more usage there relativly speaking, cause halfswording. And you do know that most properly made Longsword are as effective, if not better because of their on average longer blade against unarmored targets?Indeed, cause the Samurai had this thing called "armor" made to deal with such attacks. Swords vs armor, armor wins every time unless it is actually awful. In terms of killing an unarmored target, Katanas we're built to be durable two-handed killing machines, while Broadswords were built to be able to not completely suck against armor.
Nobody says it was a meme Weekly, just you.Their skill wasnt 'debunked', it was disagreed with because it's a meme to say that rwby isnt skilled
Can I see the CRT where the skill scaling was accepted?Not that I'm aware of no, that would require a verse-wide CRT as that is the currently accepted general skill scaling for the verse.
Disagreeing with a skill feat =/= debunking its existence, at that point youd have to have the writers rewrite the entire series lol
And better for killing since broad swords are meant for fatal thrusts, whereas katana's are generally for cutting due to their shape. Not that cutting can't be fatal. But a thrust > cutting generally...So did the Europeans. Far better armor in fact. The Sword still saw more usage there relativly speaking, cause halfswording. And you do know that most properly made Longsword are as effective, if not better because of their on average longer blade against unarmored targets?
Okay,I'll have to look into that. I haven't run into a test yet where the broadsword broke before the katana. If it's simply a case of it being "properly" made, then I'd just say the same applies to broadsword given generic mediocre broadswords handle damage better than generic mediocre katana's.
I will say this though. Both serve different purposes, so it's hard to compare the two since both provide different advantages. But generally speaking, a broadsword user would end up beating a katana user from what I know. Longer reach which is op historically, and better for parrying/guarding. Disadvantage is obviously speed. But range more than makes up for it.
Plate armor was clunky, had more exploitable gaps, and made the soldier slower. That's why swords could still be used; catching a gap was easier. Samurai armor was lighter, could still take a hit from a sword, and allowed for more fluid movement, making dodging or blocking easier, and was also why the usually heavier and longer range Naginata came into play, since it could bash through armor and still cut when needed....So did the Europeans. Far better armor in fact. The Sword still saw more usage there relativly speaking, cause halfswording. And you do know that most properly made Longsword are as effective, if not better because of their on average longer blade against unarmored targets?
For piercing damage, sure. But if you can cut deep into the target or lop a limb off, they'll go down. You can get stabbed in the gut and live, even back in the day.And better for killing since broad swords are meant for fatal thrusts, whereas katana's are generally for cutting due to their shape. Not that cutting can't be fatal. But a thrust > cutting generally
Honestly, before we derail this like sweaty neckbeards talking about sword performance in a goddamn vs thread, I will just link the in my opinion most unbiased comparason video regarding the topic and leave it at that.
Jaune's Semblance can amp him to Low 7-BSo going into the fight Iaian takes this in AP, being at a comfortable 65.12 Kilotons while Jaune upscales from 29.12 Kilotons. That being said, Jaune's semblance allows him to amplify his stats, so the AP difference isn't as clear cut value as for who wins here. Since neither has really any hax abilities either, the victor from the fight will mostly be due to their skills and abilities here, so lets discuss that.
In terms of skill, I think Iaian takes this. As much as I can see Weekly's train of thought here regarding skill gaps, I don't think this can apply to Jaune here as he is still somewhat inexperienced compared to his compatriots. Don't get me wrong, he's definetely not as clueless as his Volume 1-3 self, but he doesn't quite matchup to the rest of the RWBY cast in terms of skill for a few reasons.
- Even though he has improved in later volumes he does not quite match the fluidity and hunterlevel acrobatics that his other teammates manage.
- Although Jaune has participated in a lot more fights according to the wiki in which he "wins", this was usually done as part of a group, and in half of them his contributions were not as significant in terms of actual fighting.
- Jaune has definetely improved against Grimm, but he still loses against most human opponents such his first fight with Cinder in volume 5, his fight against Neo in Volume 7 and his second fight with Cinder in Volume 8. He did win against team FNKI in Volume 7, but even that fight was with help.
- It should also be noted that Jaune is noted to have both incredible strength and giant Aura reserves, which has likely allowed him to keep up with dangerous opponents despite his lack of skill (at least compared to other cast members.
Nobody says it was a meme Weekly, just you.
Going onto Iaian's side however, while not much is really known about him, we do know he is the disciple of Atomic Samurai, who is an S-class hero, and is stated to be the greatest disciple out of his 3 current ones. He is also shown to have great skill with a blade as seen here in his fight against Devil Long Hair. So while Iaian's skill chain is much more simple, its more reliable than Jaune's due to the latters obvious inexperience and glaring problems with his skills, even in later seasons.
That being said, skill is only half of the battle here. As mentioned before, Jaune has Aura which can block Iaian's attacks, and is also noted to have incredible Aura reserves, so it would take some time before Jaune's Aura breaks and he can actually be hurt. That being said, Iaian's extrasensory perception and analytic prediction means that Jaune would struggle to hit Iaian either, though any hit that would connect would hurt a lot more than any strike that would hit Jaune, as least with Aura factored in. So it is possible Jaune could defeat Iaian before his Aura could run out. It also helps Jaune that he has superior lifting strength to the Samurai and also can attract items with his shield via Gravity Dust, so he could probably just pull Iaian's sword away from him if he gets the idea to do so, which he could given his natural leadership skills.
So there you go. Iaian has better base AP, skill and better reactions thanks to Extrasensory Perception/Anaylytical Prediction, but Jaune takes it in greater LS, superior defense thanks to Aura, the ability to pull Iaian's weapon with Gravity Dust and the ability to close the AP gap with Aura amps (possibly speed too, but I am not sure with that one atm). It could really fall either way here so I'm gonna sit on the sidelines a bit here, but I feel like everyone should get a clear idea on the advantages of each character before they make a verdict.
Not on his profile. If so, it would be noted like how Yang is "High 8-C, 8-B with Burn".Jaune's Semblance can amp him to Low 7-B
Look at the character linked in the AP description of his semblance's ampNot on his profile. If so, it would be noted like how Yang is "High 8-C, 8-B with Burn".
Here?Look at the character linked in the AP description of his semblance's amp
Cardin, who is High 8-C? I'm asking genuinely, I don't see it. I ctrl+f'd Semblance and I see nothing of the sort. It's not there.With his Semblance, he can amp his Aura Shield to the point of Cardin hurting his hand after punching him
I don't see an amp on his dogshit profile lo,Look at the character linked in the AP description of his semblance's amp
HazelHere?
Cardin, who is High 8-C? I'm asking genuinely, I don't see it. I ctrl+f'd Semblance and I see nothing of the sort. It's not there.
Regarding the cutting bit, it usually depends on the type of broad sword and quality. I hear that at lower price ranges Katana > Broadsword in cutting power. But when you get to the higher price ranges with high quality the tindistinguishable when t comes to cutting.Okay,
Indeed.
Plate armor was clunky, had more exploitable gaps, and made the soldier slower. That's why swords could still be used; catching a gap was easier. Samurai armor was lighter, could still take a hit from a sword, and allowed for more fluid movement, making dodging or blocking easier, and was also why the usually heavier and longer range Naginata came into play, since it could bash through armor and still cut when needed.
As for length being better against unarmored targets is iffy, especially when talking about a weapon like a Katana that can lop limbs off better and easier then a Broadsword.
For piercing damage, sure. But if you can cut deep into the target or lop a limb off, they'll go down. You can get stabbed in the gut and live, even back in the day.
...did it get removes or something? That's a feat that happened years agoI don't see an amp on his dogshit profile lo,
Probably lol...did it get removes or something? That's a feat that happened years ago
Seconding this, too.Can I see the CRT where the skill scaling was accepted?
Iaian can predict 100,000 attacks coming at him from all angles with his eyes closed, relying on instincts, and only having a single arm.To explain for this battle, Iaian probably loses, Jaune has the better weapon for dealing with Armor as well as a Shield and a forcefield on top of that, making Iaian's weapon not be able to fulfill it's intended purpose despite Jaune having less armor in technicality.
Oh, and Iaian being one-handed doesn't exactly do him favors