- 32,835
- 38,105
Weird, because energy-mass conversion alone won't wield anything higher than 4-C.I would also like to know about this, since I've heard that you can get a 4-B result from it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weird, because energy-mass conversion alone won't wield anything higher than 4-C.I would also like to know about this, since I've heard that you can get a 4-B result from it
Shake is talking about some quick maths of mine on discord.Weird, because energy-mass conversion alone won't wield anything higher than 4-C.
Aye, since the radius IS THE VIEWING DISTANCE after all.If I'm doing a cloud calculation can I use the radius as the viewing distance if I'm finding the volume?
Aye, since the radius IS THE VIEWING DISTANCE after all.
This is assuming you're just doing a normal cloud calculation and the cloud isn't actually fully shown in a full planet shot or something.
Well what I'm doing is trying to find the mass of clouds that was dispersed 100km+This is assuming you're just doing a normal cloud calculation and the cloud isn't actually fully shown in a full planet shot or something.
Hmmmm, you have the diameter, right? And you know the cloud type? Various cloud types have various cloud thicknesses. It's just a matter of multiplying the cloud area with height to get volume, and then using cloud density to get mass. And then you use KE on it depending on how it was moved.Well what I'm doing is trying to find the mass of clouds that was dispersed 100km+
Appreciate itHmmmm, you have the diameter, right? And you know the cloud type? Various cloud types have various cloud thicknesses. It's just a matter of multiplying the cloud area with height to get volume, and then using cloud density to get mass. And then you use KE on it depending on how it was moved.
(1/12) * mass * velocity^2 for omnidirectional expansion/dispersion, or 0.5 * mass * velocity^2 if the cloud was moved in the classical one direction.
How do I calc these? Feat demon king makes a storm Feat: It looks like escanor melted this castle, the chapters are here if you want to look more in-depth I want to learn how to calc stuff.
I use a PC so I'm mostly accustomed to using paint.net and MS Paint. Paint.net accurately gives pixel lengths.Does anyone know any apps for drawing lines and seeing the pixels?
Photoshop does as well btw... Think it's called line toolPaint.net accurately gives pixel lengths.
So how do I find out the length?Photoshop does as well btw... Think it's called line tool
You hold it and drag the line in any direction and it will tell you the pixels, then you can color the line when the line is created by pressing stroke and selecting a color, you can then even customize the size of the line as well which is under the stroke buttonSo how do I find out the length?
@Dark-Carioca @Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan Would you be able to help out here, since you both have some experience regarding tensile strength calcs?About this feat I calculated :
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:DenLitz/Calculation_Taesoo_destroy_brick_wall
is it correct? KLOL has evaluated it, but I'd be calmer if more than 1 CGM evaluate it, because it's a little confusing for me. So if other CGMs would like to check it out, that would be very helpful.
Yeah, that's why I didn't use frag for the entire wall, I used the sides of the wall and their tiny surface area as the acting point for the tensile strength.I'm not sure if the bricks are actually destroyed since you still see entire bricks.
isn't that glue supposed to be plaster which is nowadays made out of cement/concrete? AFAIK, modern bricks are made from concrete. Cement apparently has a tensile strength of 2 - 5 MPa. Should we use that instead?Aren't bricks usually like glued together with some special substance though? Might just be overcoming that glue rather than breaking brick.
If using Tensile Strength Cement, how about Tensile Strength Brick Wall? How does it work? I'm curious how the Tensile Strength Brick Wall is applied, if the tensile strength of the brick wall uses Tensile Strength of Cement.isn't that glue supposed to be plaster which is nowadays made out of cement/concrete? AFAIK, modern bricks are made from concrete. Cement apparently has a tensile strength of 2 - 5 MPa. Should we use that instead?
Since the small area you calculated is the connection point for the bricks to stay connected to the wall, the most definite answer is that the actual thing being destroyed is the plaster glue holding them together.If using Tensile Strength Cement, how about Tensile Strength Brick Wall? How does it work? I'm curious how the Tensile Strength Brick Wall is applied, if the tensile strength of the brick wall uses Tensile Strength of Cement.
He actually cracked the area around Tensile Strength.Since the small area you calculated is the connection point for the bricks to stay connected to the wall, the most definite answer is that the actual thing being destroyed is the plaster glue holding them together.
You prolly could get higher results by calculating all the seams in the bricks that got detached but that's prolly going to be borderline impossible since we have no side-by-side shots to accurately compare the "before" and "after" of the feat. Hence, the side points will have to do as a low-ball.
Once again, can't calc the cracks. Too unpredictable.He actually cracked the area around Tensile Strength.
Be my guest. If you can find the lines between each of the bricks when it was intact and find the areas of those affected, lemme know. But the current area affected should be probably fine to use for now.He should have gotten a higher level of his low ball, if all of each side of the brick can be calc, I'll try my best.
Tensile strength.So is Tensile Strength Cement more accurate here? Or Shear Strength Cement?
The bricks are being pushed away from their glued point. Kinda akin to Lizard tearing out a train's backside by pushing.I'm not sure if tensile strength is completely accurate since it's supposed to be when a material fails from pulling it. Idk what to use for this, to be honest.
Pretty sure it was a rapid push, only upwards.Yeah but for Lizard's case the force applied is parallel to the direction the top of the train being pulled apart,
Not sure about that, it definitely looks like the cement being overpowered to the point where it just... fails.while in this case the cement isn't being pulled apart but rather bricks slide past it to fall out.
Something something there was a discussion going on for a revolutionary shockwave formula that worked in both ground level and in space but it got put on iceIs there a formula for explosions in space?
Does that mean there's no way to calc a space explosion?Something something there was a discussion going on for a revolutionary shockwave formula that worked in both ground level and in space but it got put on ice
At the moment? Nope.Does that mean there's no way to calc a space explosion?
Well, we know for sure that airburst is impossible in space because... well... no air.But what if the explosion doesn't happen on ground?
Ground formula thenWell, we know for sure that airburst is impossible in space because... well... no air.