- 9,978
- 2,015
That works like a pocket storage, it has nothing to do with AP.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Newer SU continuation revision
- Thread starter The_real_cal_howard
- Start date
- Status
- 14,391
- 5,220
- 61,177
- 14,747
Oh speaking of mass energy conversion, i started on some of the corrupted gems and so far Nephrite is High 6-C
- 15,637
- 5,392
We already said no on using ME.WeeklyBattles said:
- 61,177
- 14,747
@Dargoo For what reason?
- 15,637
- 5,392
https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/2619751#8WeeklyBattles said:
- 9,978
- 2,015
What? We already have a large disussion about why we do not use m-e conversion in the previous thread. Literally everyone agreed to not using it anymore.
- 61,177
- 14,747
Gems exist because of mass energy conversion, not using it makes zero sense
- 9,978
- 2,015
As for Lapis recalc, I doubt it will shield that much, the ocean takes a great surface, a rought calc will makes the shield durability 10^(-12) times the KE of the water falling. Also, takes into account that water has a center mass unstable due being liquid fluid.
- 26,160
- 3,653
So, since most agreed here, how do people change here?
- 5,141
- 290
Hightly doubt there's any 100% consensus about the rating of the GemsRicsi-viragosi said:
- 26,160
- 3,653
I meant the M-E thing. Plus, both Paulo, Dargoo, and I agree on non-fusions being tier 7.
- 9,978
- 2,015
We already agreed (most of us including staff) to not use e-m convertion. Now, we're waiting for Bambu that supposelly is compilating feats to calculate (although I've heard any response from him); finally, we look for scaling.
- 5,141
- 290
Well, I'll to post it
But I made a calc for Sapphire's hail
Though I never did a storm calc before, so it may be wrong
But I made a calc for Sapphire's hail
Though I never did a storm calc before, so it may be wrong
- 15,637
- 5,392
n i c e
I'd reccomend watching the scene to see how long Sapphire was gone to give you a timeframe for how fast the snowfall was made.
I wouldn't use high intensity given that it was a light snowfall but the drop in tempreture should make up for that.
I'd reccomend watching the scene to see how long Sapphire was gone to give you a timeframe for how fast the snowfall was made.
I wouldn't use high intensity given that it was a light snowfall but the drop in tempreture should make up for that.
- 14,391
- 5,220
Is it the one from Now We're Only Falling Apart? I can go check how long it took if you need.
- 15,637
- 5,392
Yeah.
- 14,391
- 5,220
- 5,141
- 290
15 secs
And used low intensity
Also, used 10 km according to the View Distance in the Coud Calculation Page, but, I use that as diameter or radius?
And used low intensity
Also, used 10 km according to the View Distance in the Coud Calculation Page, but, I use that as diameter or radius?
- 26,160
- 3,653
Is the portal litirally next to that entrance? If not, there probably was a little time spent with them walking there.
- 5,141
- 290
Or should I go with 20km?
- 26,160
- 3,653
Pretty sure 20km is diameter, so 10 should be the radius.
- 14,391
- 5,220
That's just on-screen time tho, they might have searched for her in other places before and the show just didn't show, or maybe it actually did take leass than 18 seconds, it's hard to tell, because the scene changes in the middle of he feat.
- 5,141
- 290
I thought 15 would be fine, like, 3 sec for a superhumanly fast gem is reasonable since Steven himself is FTE in running apparentlyRicsi-viragosi said:
- 9,978
- 2,015
Kep said that the standard of horizont storms (or whatever is called) do not apply for this feat, but do not remember why. In that case I think we go for the 5 km.
- 26,160
- 3,653
Exactly my point.Paulo.junior.969 said:
Don't see how it would be less tough, since everything shown did happen.
- 26,160
- 3,653
They were walking tough.AidenBrooks999 said:
- 14,391
- 5,220
We also have to keep in mind that the storm was already formed when they got there.
- 26,160
- 3,653
That doesn't make using 18 seconds a good decision tough.Paulo.junior.969 said:
- 9,978
- 2,015
Generally, we do not consider how much time it took somehting for being created/destroyed; the calc apply as long it took a time next to 0, it decrease if it tooks too much time.
- 26,160
- 3,653
What?Antoniofer said:
Storms do need the amount of time needed to create them in such cases.
- 26,160
- 3,653
Plus, with how calmly the snow was falling, and how much everything was already covered, assuming only 20 seconds passed is weird as well. Obviously, the fact that that much snow was already there means the storm was formed for a bit already, but using what is shown as a timer is a no.
Should go with the average 1, 5 and 10 minutes.
Should go with the average 1, 5 and 10 minutes.
- 14,391
- 5,220
Maybe we should use 18 seconds as a really high end and assume a time frame for a low end? Maybe a few minutes or something like that?
- 26,160
- 3,653
It's still based on nothing, and is certanly wrong to at least some extent.Paulo.junior.969 said:
It's would still better to go with the standard 1, 5 and 10 minutes, me thinks.
- 5,141
- 290
@Ricsi but Sapphire could be running
Again, we only se her dissappear for 18 secs
Also, pretty sure if they were searching around for her, there would be a scene about it, but we got them instantly in the place
Again, we only se her dissappear for 18 secs
Also, pretty sure if they were searching around for her, there would be a scene about it, but we got them instantly in the place
- 9,978
- 2,015
@Ricsi, CAPE or condensation do not takes time into the equation, and now we only use KE for preformed storms; creating them do not qualify for the last one. And for the freezing/heating calcs, I think we do not use times in those neither.
- 26,160
- 3,653
I just pointed out other problems with that assumption tough.AidenBrooks999 said:
Like, the amoun of snow that was on stuff is a big no to 18 seconds already as is, and they question whenever she's where they went. We don't assume the inflatated version just because there is no proof against it (even though there is here)
- 26,160
- 3,653
The amount of heat you remove per second is what would get your AP tough.Antoniofer said:
- Status
Similar threads
