• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Newer SU continuation revision

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Weekly, In which case, then light cannons don't scale to the Gem Warship's durability, and therefore the explosion that harmed the warship doesn't scale to the Red Eye, meaning that we should just use the calc of the warship explosion itself.
 
@Antonio Because the Light Cannons now scale in between Garnet and Opal without removing any consistency by giving them a number lower than the feat Garnet scales to
 
See? Now we're all happy, Dargoo gets to have the Light Cannons be above Garnet in AP and Garnet still scales to the ship's core
 
If the physics behind the Red Eye still apply, the Light Cannon still needs to surpass the GBE of the Eye. Also, if we apply that last logic we will remove a few calcs about busting planets.
 
@Antonio If you want to calc the GBE of the Eye then feel free to, ive been trying to have someone do that for years now

Which ones? I assume youre referring to corebusting?
 
1. Why Opal is above the Light Cannons?

2. What's the AP feat of the Warship?

3. If they needed the Light Cannon to stop the red eye, doesn't that implies they weaker than a single cannon?
 
Yes, refering the corebusting, this calc use the same principle than any of them.

@AIden, the reason why Opal is above is cuz shook the Warship slightly more than the Light Cannon did (although I find this iffy). The warship has no AP, Weekly has to scale it from another ship, in a questionable way. And yes, everyone still being way weaker than the Red Eye.
 
@Antonio Do you have to overpower the GBE to bust a planet via corebusting? I never understood exactly how those feats work tbh
 
@Aiden Yes, theyre weaker than a single cannon

The warship scales to a 6000+ year old outdated gem ship that wasnt built for combat having a tier 6 feat with its core
 
Like I said I'm fine with Tier 6 fusions (Minus Garnet and Smokey, of course); I beleive that makes reasonable sense. The base Gems shouldn't be any higher than 7-A, though.
 
@Dargoo Waiting on Bambu

Also does someone want to calc some non-shapeshifting and non-fusion related mass energy conversion for the verse?
 
As I've said before we should use the largest amount of water Lapis has used to attack someone for scaling, otherwise it would be Environmental Destruction. That said having more calcs for Lapis' extent of water control would be nice.
 
@Dargoo why not Smokey?

Yeah, I'm trying to do the Sapphire feat, and it's 7-A at best (Although I never did a storm feat before, so it may be higher or lower)
 
Wait for Bambu's calc for the AoE

In the meantime someone adjust Lapis' storm feat to our new storm standards

Also there are multiple non shapeshifting and non fusion related mass energy feats if someone is interested in calcing them
 
I'd personally say Smoky is slightly stronger than Garnet given how easily she manhandled Jasper.
 
Recalc Lapis rain isn't that hard, I think that the new standard is 20 km radius and using CAPE, the weather is just cloudy so constant is 1 kJ/kg, so output would be 20000^2*pi*8000*1.225*1000/4184000000000000 = 2.94 Megatons.
 
Mmmm, welp, I remember a hard rain, but I do not recall that much thunders in the sky, the sea was also relatively calm. But is at the very most 109 Megatons.
 
I thought the vast majority consensus at this point was that ME wasn't valid.

Like a large number of regular users, a number of staff, and several calc members said no.
 
Almost everyone would scale to being able to break steven's bubble or fighting someone who can, hence why we need Bambu's calc on the ocean falling onto it

Also, again, there are mass energy calcs that can be done that dont involve shapeshifting or fusion
 
@Dargoo, is not mass-energy convertion, is CAPE, or are you refering to other calc? Anyway, that is no longer used.
 
@Dargoo The concensus is that its not valid for their bodies, but Gems break down physical objects into energy regularly
 
WeeklyBattles said:
@Dargoo The concensus is that its not valid for their bodies, but Gems break down physical objects into energy regularly
Link 'em.

Also needs very solid backing to assume it isn't vaporization, extreme pulverization, atomization, etc.
 
Paulo.junior.969 said:
They turn stuff into energy when they put them in their gemstones? Legit asking, I don't remember.
That wouldn't really scale to AP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top