• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

New Tiering System was applied.

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Andy

Thank you for the evaluation. I think that you are probably correct.

This would mean that somebody has to modify all of the tier 11 striking strength sections after I have restored these ratings though.

We should probably wait a bit for more input first though.
 
Based on what is he Low 1-A rather than High 1-B?
 
SCP Scarlet King? uh, idk, but they said TSK would be downgraded to around 2-A to low 1-C, but i personally think the gods within narrative would be High 1-C to low 1-B, or even straight up 1-B.
 
Antvasima said:
I would much prefer if you do not mess up the Cthulhu Mythos, as I trust Azathoth's sense of judgement regarding it, but he is unlikely to come back to the wiki.
Click to expand...
Azathoth exists "at the center of infinity". It doesn't sound awesome enough for tier 0 character, IMHO. Some characters like Ga and The Star Maker contain everything (infinities and all supernatural stuff) withing themselves.
 
FanofRPGs said:
Cthulhu Mythos will likely be:
Cthulhu: Unknown

Hypnos: High 1-B, possiblly 1-A+

Outergods: 1-A, possibly High 1-A

Azathoth and Yog Sothoth: 1-A, possibly 0

After my revisions
Click to expand...
I wait and I will support your revisions definitely. Outer Gods have been beaten on spacebattles (which is the most hardcore site for VS debates in the entire internet) many times.
 
Spacebattles doesn't understand the Cthulhu Mythos. They go straight to "it's all flowery language"
 
Yes. Let's stay on topic and try to be constructive please.
 
@Ant Can you unlock SCP-2747 and SCP-3812 so I can change parts of their AP from "1-A, possibly 1-A" and "1-A, will eventually become 1-A" to "1-A, possibly higher" and "1-A, will eventually become higher" respectively?
 
I will unlock them, but wouldn't just 1-A be better?
 
Tell me here when you are done.
 
Hmm, Ultima did suggest just 1-A, but Andy suggested higher, and Oblivion linked Yujiro Hanma which uses higher.

But regardless, I've made the edit.
 
Antvasima said:
So should I restore the tier 11 Striking Strength sections?
Click to expand...
That should be fine. I'm still not sure what should be done about lifting strength for tier 11 characters...

I know that Ultima and Saikou are both planning their own revisions relating to the lower tiers, I'll try to get their input.
 
I have restored the Microversal striking strength levels. Is somebody willing to update the tier 11 wiki pages accordingly?
 
Aeyu suggested using '''Inapplicable''' for all lifting strength below 3D.
 
Thank you for the help. I have unlocked the pages. Tell me here when you are done.
 
Andy got them. They can be locked now.
 
Agnaa said:
Aeyu suggested using Inapplicable for all lifting strength below 3D.
Click to expand...
Would the rest of you be fine with this?
 
Hello.

It has been suggested to me in private that we should use the word "Hypoverse level/Hypoversal" to replace "Microverse level/Microversal".

This is due to that micro implies being small, but only in a regular physical sense, and the term is rather random. Micro denotes 10e-6 in scientific notation. It makes as much sense as using nano (10e-9), pico (10e-12), femto (10e-15), atto (10e-18), etcetera.

"Hypo" on the other hand, is used as a suffix for under/below. Like hypoglycemic means having low blood sugar. It is not used in context of physical units like micro/nano/pico etcetera. It just means "lesser than", or "below" something. Furthermore, it's the literary inverse of "hyper", which makes it a fitting complement to the existing "Hyperverse" terminology.

Would this be acceptable to the rest of you?

Also, I am fine with "Inapplicable" lifting strength for tier 11.
 
If you don't think its similarity in spelling/pronunciation will lead to confusion with "Hyperverse level/Hyperversal" (Perhaps you've had other terminology just as similar without much confusion, or perhaps you just have an inkling that it's different enough) I'd be fine with that.
 
Well, as long as we provide a brief explanation of the name in the Tiering System page, it should probably be fine.
 
Can somebody ask Ultima to comment here again regarding the "Hypoverse" and "Inapplicable" naming conventions?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Fixxed
  • Locked
Higher D by Transcending Infinite/all level of Power and Existential
Replies
7
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Boy.Line
Qualification issues.
Replies
7
Views
752
TheOrangeGuy09
TheOrangeGuy09
Laxxius
  • Locked
Tiering System Revision (Tier 4-C and up)
Replies
19
Views
2K
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
Lloydblitzed
Ninjago Star Tiering and Possible New Value
6 7 8
Replies
297
Views
9K
Lloydblitzed
Lloydblitzed
DontTalkDT
Context is always important - Changing a bad formulation of the Tiering System
Replies
17
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top