>"Respectfully" but comes out aggressively swinging as soon as he is pressed, and leaves the same way.
Even when you came in initially, you wrote as if everyone you disagree with is acting irrational and absurd, using unfriendly "common sense" arguments that insult the intelligences of the opposition, and that are designed as buzzword that signal to all who listen that your opponent is irrational.
That phrasing comes off that way by design, whether you believe it is tonally aggressive or not. Anyone with reading comprehension skills and the ability to read tone in general when having conversation could see how absurd you believe those you disagree with are, and it would be hard not to view that. My comment about the staff being hostile wasn't solely directed at you, but by Griffin's unnecessarily condescending attitude to this entire thread, and then you getting in TFO's face when he was aggressively pressing you as you aggressively press everyone else when arguing on the site with your tone and phrasing (seriously, I know we all have to analyze this shit in English classes, so please don't try to play "you can't read tone!" because if you passed high school, you had to, especially when you had to do so to call TFO out). Even my tone and phrasing comes off as really aggressive in point 1, me responding to a hostile atmosphere where everyone is writing angry essays at each other.
I can give you slack on your first post, as my post for part 1 comes off as more aggressive than I was actually intending when it comes to diction and phrasing— rather, I was trying to come off as more aggressive in an inquisitive sense, highly confused at such a strange position— but every other post you made is fairly aggressive. Which is fine on its own— quite a few staff members have this aggressive, slightly condescending tone when debating, as most people do here, me included— intentional or otherwise.
It just really jarring when you get in someone else's face for doing only slightly more than what you do. I wouldn't call saying "Bleach Scaling is terrible as it is based off of a single feat, and you ignoring that there but making that argument here brings up a double standard" in so many words in response to what he perceives as a faulty argument in an aggressive tone a "temper tantrum". I read the thread, and that is my perception, flawed as it may be.
You want to see pure debating? Read IMade. He hasn't gotten aggressive in his tone during his arguments, even as the thread was against him, in both argument and aggression.
