- 21,469
- 30,790
Sorry Jvando
Via our multiplier standards, it says that we need direct statements for multipliers.
Now it says that the first gate is utilizing 100% of the muscular energy when it usually utilizes 20%, so the strength is there. It even talks about muscle power and its limits, support.
It also says that speed is enhanced.
But the issue is that speed isn't stated to be amped on the same extent. It doesn't say "it utilizes 100% of its speed when it usually utilizes 20%", as speed is something that isn't really linear when trying to measure speed from force applied per movement and allat.
It basically never says speed is multiplied.
Strength multiplier stays, speed multiplier goes.
Via our multiplier standards, it says that we need direct statements for multipliers.
Now it says that the first gate is utilizing 100% of the muscular energy when it usually utilizes 20%, so the strength is there. It even talks about muscle power and its limits, support.
It also says that speed is enhanced.
But the issue is that speed isn't stated to be amped on the same extent. It doesn't say "it utilizes 100% of its speed when it usually utilizes 20%", as speed is something that isn't really linear when trying to measure speed from force applied per movement and allat.
It basically never says speed is multiplied.
Strength multiplier stays, speed multiplier goes.