- 32,835
- 38,104
That needs explicit references to mass-energy conversion being actually used.That's not what I meant, creating a star using energy is 4-B based on this
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That needs explicit references to mass-energy conversion being actually used.That's not what I meant, creating a star using energy is 4-B based on this
Or would that be empathic manip?watched the movie for the first time. Decent movie, fun, simple. Feat was disappointing but i don't care. Thor is now a dad and that's great. Thor gets mind hax by knocking people out by flashing his massive d
Arishem states that the universe is a constant exchange of energy and an infinite cycle of creation and destruction, where the Celestials use that energy to create suns, generating gravity, heat and light like IRL, we also know that Arishem can create antimatter and that the VFX team drew on astrophysics to make the Celestials scenes. What other references are needed?That needs explicit references to mass-energy conversion being actually used.
No.4-B thor?
Unfortunately that's not happening. We need explicit confirmation that the suns are created via mass-energy creation. They need to say it directly like this.If Thor becomes 4-B.
I will done MCU THOR vs Brynnie Bratton, to see how the god of Thunder is destroyed be a little girl of 9 years
I know, but I would like to see high 4-C Thor, so i could put him to fight Superheroe squad charactersUnfortunately that's not happening. We need explicit confirmation that the suns are created via mass-energy creation. They need to say it directly like this.
"They create suns through mass-energy conversion". If this isn't present, it's a no-go.
The feat literally meets all the requirements with the exception that Arishem doesn't say "Celestials create suns through mass-energy conversion", that can't be used for a possibly at least?Unfortunately that's not happening. We need explicit confirmation that the suns are created via mass-energy creation. They need to say it directly like this.
"They create suns through mass-energy conversion". If this isn't present, it's a no-go.
Unfortunately, no, we don't grant "possibly" ratings based on that alone. That's just how strict our mass-energy conversion standards are.The feat literally meets all the requirements with the exception that Arishem doesn't say "Celestials create suns through mass-energy conversion", that can't be used for a possibly at least?
At best this just warrants a "possibly higher" rating IMHO. For all we know, the stars could've grown to such size on their own given that each of these stars had enough gravity to forge their own galaxies without further assistance from the Celestials.Likewise the Celestials should be High 4-C because this video states that they are the progenitors of the universe as we know it and they used their energy to create the building blocks (suns) of all of life across the cosmos, Arishem also says that without the Celestials the universe would fall into darkness and all life would die.
Arishem says that the Celestials create suns to form new galaxies, not that each of those suns can have enough gravity to forge their own galaxies. This is the full statement:At best this just warrants a "possibly higher" rating IMHO. For all we know, the stars could've grown to such size on their own given that each of these stars had enough gravity to forge their own galaxies without further assistance from the Celestials.
Our universe is a constant exchange of energy. An infinite cycle of creation and destruction. Celestials use energy gathered from host planets to create suns, generating gravity, heat and light, for new galaxies to form. Without us, our universe will fall into darkness, all life would die.
TrueWell, the two Celestials could have been born after the Big Bang, like Tiamut
It's more than likely that many Celestials were born afterWell, the two Celestials could have been born after the Big Bang, like Tiamut
That statement refers to this scene, it basically supports that the Celestial is creating a galaxyThe building entire galaxies from scratch thing doesn't necessarily mean directly creating galaxies themselves, it can easily be interpretated as simply creating them piece by piece (aka star by star) but the rest looks pretty solid
That's probably gonna be derailed to oblivion lolTier 3 Celestials would have to be accepted first lmao
FR LMAOThat's probably gonna be derailed to oblivion lol
BRUHI also found these articles stating that the Celestials are capable of building entire galaxies from scratch and that they are larger than galaxies, and this interview confirms that photographs of galaxies were used for the Celestials scene. There's also this article saying that the VFX team created suns, galaxies, black holes, supernovas and the Big Bang
Technically speaking if they're galaxy sized, then the stars they're shown to make would also be way, way larger than anything we know of (Black hole territory possibly). And the stars forging its own galaxies? Well, it'd no longer be in the realm of outliers. So this is indeed big.The building entire galaxies from scratch thing doesn't necessarily mean directly creating galaxies themselves, it can easily be interpretated as simply creating them piece by piece (aka star by star) but the rest looks pretty solid
Ooohhh boy RoT what have you done?! XDTechnically speaking if they're galaxy sized, then the stars they're shown to make would also be way, way larger than anything we know of (Black hole territory possibly). And the stars forging its own galaxies? Well, it'd no longer be in the realm of outliers. So this is indeed big.
Ironically it'd make the 4-A feats that much more consistent.
One of the articles claims that the VFX team created black holes, so...Technically speaking if they're galaxy sized, then the stars they're shown to make would also be way, way larger than anything we know of (Black hole territory possibly). And the stars forging its own galaxies? Well, it'd no longer be in the realm of outliers. So this is indeed big.
BRUHOne of the articles claims that the VFX team created black holes, so...
The first two no so they are used as a very small support, the videos and the interview yes, basically everything about the VFX is WoGSo even if 3-C is not accepted, we have 4-B
Also, again, are these articles WOGs?
Yes the VFX is definitely WOGThe first two no so they are used as a very small support, the videos and the interview yes, basically everything about the VFX is WoG